Explainable AI for Classifying UTI Risk Groups Using a Real-World Linked EHR and Pathology Lab Dataset

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17645v3
• Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:16:36 GMT
• Title: Explainable AI for Classifying UTI Risk Groups Using a Real-World Linked EHR and Pathology Lab Dataset
• Authors: Yujie Dai, Brian Sullivan, Axel Montout, Amy Dillon, Chris Waller, Peter Acs, Rachel Denholm, Philip Williams, Alastair D Hay, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Andrew Dowsey,
• Abstract summary: We leverage a linked EHR dataset to characterize urinary tract infections (UTIs)<n>We introduce a UTI risk estimation framework informed by clinical expertise to estimate UTI risk across individual patient timelines.<n>Our findings reveal differences in clinical and demographic predictors across risk groups.
• Score: 0.47517735516852333
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The use of machine learning and AI on electronic health records (EHRs) holds substantial potential for clinical insight. However, this approach faces challenges due to data heterogeneity, sparsity, temporal misalignment, and limited labeled outcomes. In this context, we leverage a linked EHR dataset of approximately one million de-identified individuals from Bristol, North Somerset, and South Gloucestershire, UK, to characterize urinary tract infections (UTIs). We implemented a data pre-processing and curation pipeline that transforms the raw EHR data into a structured format suitable for developing predictive models focused on data fairness, accountability and transparency. Given the limited availability and biases of ground truth UTI outcomes, we introduce a UTI risk estimation framework informed by clinical expertise to estimate UTI risk across individual patient timelines. Pairwise XGBoost models are trained using this framework to differentiate UTI risk categories with explainable AI techniques applied to identify key predictors and support interpretability. Our findings reveal differences in clinical and demographic predictors across risk groups. While this study highlights the potential of AI-driven insights to support UTI clinical decision-making, further investigation of patient sub-strata and extensive validation are needed to ensure robustness and applicability in clinical practice.

Related papers

• Detecting Dataset Bias in Medical AI: A Generalized and Modality-Agnostic Auditing Framework [8.520644988801243]
  latent bias in machine learning datasets can be amplified during training and/or hidden during testing. We present a data modality-agnostic auditing framework for generating targeted hypotheses about sources of bias. We demonstrate the broad applicability and value of our method by analyzing large-scale medical datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T02:16:48Z)
• TrialBench: Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence-Ready Clinical Trial Datasets [57.067409211231244]
  This paper presents meticulously curated AIready datasets covering multi-modal data (e.g., drug molecule, disease code, text, categorical/numerical features) and 8 crucial prediction challenges in clinical trial design. We provide basic validation methods for each task to ensure the datasets' usability and reliability. We anticipate that the availability of such open-access datasets will catalyze the development of advanced AI approaches for clinical trial design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T09:13:10Z)
• Enabling Collaborative Clinical Diagnosis of Infectious Keratitis by Integrating Expert Knowledge and Interpretable Data-driven Intelligence [28.144658552047975]
  This study investigates the performance, interpretability, and clinical utility of knowledge-guided diagnosis model (KGDM) in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis (IK) The diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) of the interpreted AI-based biomarkers are effective, ranging from 3.011 to 35.233. The participants with collaboration achieved a performance exceeding that of both humans and AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T02:10:54Z)
• MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
  This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion. It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space. It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z)
• Contrastive Learning-based Imputation-Prediction Networks for In-hospital Mortality Risk Modeling using EHRs [9.578930989075035]
  This paper presents a contrastive learning-based imputation-prediction network for predicting in-hospital mortality risks using EHR data. Our approach introduces graph analysis-based patient stratification modeling in the imputation process to group similar patients. Experiments on two real-world EHR datasets show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches in both imputation and prediction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-19T03:24:34Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• Explainable AI for Malnutrition Risk Prediction from m-Health and Clinical Data [3.093890460224435]
  This paper presents a novel AI framework for early and explainable malnutrition risk detection based on heterogeneous m-health data. We performed an extensive model evaluation including both subject-independent and personalised predictions. We also investigated several benchmark XAI methods to extract global model explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T08:07:35Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• Integrated Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks for Health Risk Prediction using Patient Journey Data with Many Missing Values [9.418011774179794]
  This paper proposes a novel end-to-end approach to modeling EHR patient journey data with Integrated Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks. Our model can capture both long- and short-term temporal patterns within each patient journey and effectively handle the high degree of missingness in EHR data without any imputation data generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T07:36:18Z)
• Generating Synthetic Mixed-type Longitudinal Electronic Health Records for Artificial Intelligent Applications [9.374416143268892]
  generative adversarial network (GAN) entitled EHR-M-GAN which synthesizes textitmixed-type timeseries EHR data. We have validated EHR-M-GAN on three publicly-available intensive care unit databases with records from a total of 141,488 unique patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T17:17:34Z)
• Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
  This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model. We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data. Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• Deep Representation for Connected Health: Semi-supervised Learning for Analysing the Risk of Urinary Tract Infections in People with Dementia [2.66008303934728]
  This work presents a semi-supervised model that can learn from routinely collected in-home observation and measurement data. We show how our model can process highly imbalanced and dynamic data to make robust predictions in analysing the risk of Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) in dementia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-27T18:58:05Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)
• Uncovering the structure of clinical EEG signals with self-supervised learning [64.4754948595556]
  Supervised learning paradigms are often limited by the amount of labeled data that is available. This phenomenon is particularly problematic in clinically-relevant data, such as electroencephalography (EEG) By extracting information from unlabeled data, it might be possible to reach competitive performance with deep neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-31T14:34:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.