User-item fairness tradeoffs in recommendations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04466v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 18:59:51 GMT
• Title: User-item fairness tradeoffs in recommendations
• Authors: Sophie Greenwood, Sudalakshmee Chiniah, Nikhil Garg,
• Abstract summary: We develop a model of recommendations with user and item fairness objectives. We identify two phenomena: (a) when user preferences are diverse, there is "free" item and user fairness; and (b) users whose preferences are misestimated can be especially disadvantaged by item fairness constraints.
• Score: 0.7490658564954134
• License:
• Abstract: In the basic recommendation paradigm, the most (predicted) relevant item is recommended to each user. This may result in some items receiving lower exposure than they "should"; to counter this, several algorithmic approaches have been developed to ensure item fairness. These approaches necessarily degrade recommendations for some users to improve outcomes for items, leading to user fairness concerns. In turn, a recent line of work has focused on developing algorithms for multi-sided fairness, to jointly optimize user fairness, item fairness, and overall recommendation quality. This induces the question: what is the tradeoff between these objectives, and what are the characteristics of (multi-objective) optimal solutions? Theoretically, we develop a model of recommendations with user and item fairness objectives and characterize the solutions of fairness-constrained optimization. We identify two phenomena: (a) when user preferences are diverse, there is "free" item and user fairness; and (b) users whose preferences are misestimated can be especially disadvantaged by item fairness constraints. Empirically, we prototype a recommendation system for preprints on arXiv and implement our framework, measuring the phenomena in practice and showing how these phenomena inform the design of markets with recommendation systems-intermediated matching.

Related papers

• Learning Recommender Systems with Soft Target: A Decoupled Perspective [49.83787742587449]
  We propose a novel decoupled soft label optimization framework to consider the objectives as two aspects by leveraging soft labels. We present a sensible soft-label generation algorithm that models a label propagation algorithm to explore users' latent interests in unobserved feedback via neighbors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T04:20:15Z)
• Improving Recommendation Fairness via Data Augmentation [66.4071365614835]
  Collaborative filtering based recommendation learns users' preferences from all users' historical behavior data, and has been popular to facilitate decision making. A recommender system is considered unfair when it does not perform equally well for different user groups according to users' sensitive attributes. In this paper, we study how to improve recommendation fairness from the data augmentation perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T13:11:46Z)
• Recommendation Systems with Distribution-Free Reliability Guarantees [83.80644194980042]
  We show how to return a set of items rigorously guaranteed to contain mostly good items. Our procedure endows any ranking model with rigorous finite-sample control of the false discovery rate. We evaluate our methods on the Yahoo! Learning to Rank and MSMarco datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T17:49:25Z)
• Experiments on Generalizability of User-Oriented Fairness in Recommender Systems [2.0932879442844476]
  A fairness-aware recommender system aims to treat different user groups similarly. We propose a user-centered fairness re-ranking framework applied on top of a base ranking model. We evaluate the final recommendations provided by the re-ranking framework from both user- (e.g., NDCG) and item-side (e.g., novelty, item-fairness) metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T12:36:30Z)
• A Graph-based Approach for Mitigating Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems [7.3129791870997085]
  We introduce FairMatch, a graph-based algorithm that improves exposure fairness for items and suppliers. A comprehensive set of experiments on two datasets and comparison with state-of-the-art baselines show that FairMatch, while significantly improves exposure fairness and aggregate diversity, maintains an acceptable level of relevance of the recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T18:01:26Z)
• PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User Satisfaction [76.98616102965023]
  We describe a novel Personalized Unexpected Recommender System (PURS) model that incorporates unexpectedness into the recommendation process. Extensive offline experiments on three real-world datasets illustrate that the proposed PURS model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T01:33:21Z)
• Towards Personalized Fairness based on Causal Notion [18.5897206797918]
  We introduce a framework for achieving counterfactually fair recommendations through adversary learning. Our method can generate fairer recommendations for users with a desirable recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T15:24:34Z)
• DeepFair: Deep Learning for Improving Fairness in Recommender Systems [63.732639864601914]
  The lack of bias management in Recommender Systems leads to minority groups receiving unfair recommendations. We propose a Deep Learning based Collaborative Filtering algorithm that provides recommendations with an optimum balance between fairness and accuracy without knowing demographic information about the users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T13:39:38Z)
• Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs [73.81994676695346]
  We analyze different groups of users according to their level of activity, and find that bias exists in recommendation performance between different groups. We show that inactive users may be more susceptible to receiving unsatisfactory recommendations, due to insufficient training data for the inactive users. We propose a fairness constrained approach via re-ranking to mitigate this problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T05:04:38Z)
• Opportunistic Multi-aspect Fairness through Personalized Re-ranking [5.8562079474220665]
  We present a re-ranking approach to fairness-aware recommendation that learns individual preferences across multiple fairness dimensions. We show that our opportunistic and metric-agnostic approach achieves a better trade-off between accuracy and fairness than prior re-ranking approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T04:25:20Z)
• Exploring User Opinions of Fairness in Recommender Systems [13.749884072907163]
  We ask users what their ideas of fair treatment in recommendation might be. We analyze what might cause discrepancies or changes between user's opinions towards fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-13T19:44:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.