IntellectSeeker: A Personalized Literature Management System with the Probabilistic Model and Large Language Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07213v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 06:09:49 GMT
• Title: IntellectSeeker: A Personalized Literature Management System with the Probabilistic Model and Large Language Model
• Authors: Weizhen Bian, Siyan Liu, Yubo Zhou, Dezhi Chen, Yijie Liao, Zhenzhen Fan, Aobo Wang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce IntellectSeeker, an innovative and personalized academic literature management platform.<n>This platform integrates a Large Language Model (LLM)--based semantic enhancement bot with a sophisticated probability model to personalize and streamline literature searches.
• Score: 3.104439919958372
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Faced with the burgeoning volume of academic literature, researchers often need help with uncertain article quality and mismatches in term searches using traditional academic engines. We introduce IntellectSeeker, an innovative and personalized intelligent academic literature management platform to address these challenges. This platform integrates a Large Language Model (LLM)--based semantic enhancement bot with a sophisticated probability model to personalize and streamline literature searches. We adopted the GPT-3.5-turbo model to transform everyday language into professional academic terms across various scenarios using multiple rounds of few-shot learning. This adaptation mainly benefits academic newcomers, effectively bridging the gap between general inquiries and academic terminology. The probabilistic model intelligently filters academic articles to align closely with the specific interests of users, which are derived from explicit needs and behavioral patterns. Moreover, IntellectSeeker incorporates an advanced recommendation system and text compression tools. These features enable intelligent article recommendations based on user interactions and present search results through concise one-line summaries and innovative word cloud visualizations, significantly enhancing research efficiency and user experience. IntellectSeeker offers academic researchers a highly customizable literature management solution with exceptional search precision and matching capabilities. The code can be found here: https://github.com/LuckyBian/ISY5001

Related papers

• ScholarSearch: Benchmarking Scholar Searching Ability of LLMs [5.562566989891248]
  We proposed ScholarSearch, the first dataset specifically designed to evaluate the complex information retrieval capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in academic research.<n> ScholarSearch possesses the following key characteristics: Academic Practicality, where question content closely mirrors real academic learning and research environments.<n>We expect to more precisely measure and promote the performance improvement of LLMs in complex academic information retrieval tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T02:05:23Z)
• Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models [0.2636873872510828]
  This work does not represent original research, but highlights how AI can help automate literature reviews. Future research will focus on developing a structured framework for AI-assisted literature reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T11:56:46Z)
• Personalized Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey [127.9521218125761]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become increasingly important due to their state-of-the-art performance and ability to integrate multiple data modalities.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive survey on personalized multimodal large language models, focusing on their architecture, training methods, and applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T03:59:03Z)
• A Survey of Small Language Models [104.80308007044634]
  Small Language Models (SLMs) have become increasingly important due to their efficiency and performance to perform various language tasks with minimal computational resources. We present a comprehensive survey on SLMs, focusing on their architectures, training techniques, and model compression techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T23:52:28Z)
• NLP-Powered Repository and Search Engine for Academic Papers: A Case Study on Cyber Risk Literature with CyLit [9.621564860645513]
  We propose a novel framework that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. This framework automates the retrieval, summarization, and clustering of academic literature within a specific research domain. We introduce CyLit, an NLP-powered repository specifically designed for the cyber risk literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T05:41:40Z)
• LLAssist: Simple Tools for Automating Literature Review Using Large Language Models [0.0]
  LLAssist is an open-source tool designed to streamline literature reviews in academic research. It uses Large Language Models (LLMs) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to automate key aspects of the review process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T02:48:54Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• CELA: Cost-Efficient Language Model Alignment for CTR Prediction [70.65910069412944]
  Click-Through Rate (CTR) prediction holds a paramount position in recommender systems. Recent efforts have sought to mitigate these challenges by integrating Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) We propose textbfCost-textbfEfficient textbfLanguage Model textbfAlignment (textbfCELA) for CTR prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T07:43:25Z)
• Falcon 7b for Software Mention Detection in Scholarly Documents [7.0413463890126735]
  This paper investigates the application of Falcon-7b for the detection and classification of software mentions within scholarly texts. Through comprehensive experimentation, the paper explores different training strategies, including a dual-classifier approach, adaptive sampling, and weighted loss scaling. The findings highlight the benefits of selective labelling and adaptive sampling in improving the model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T11:37:26Z)
• The Future of Scientific Publishing: Automated Article Generation [0.0]
  This study introduces a novel software tool leveraging large language model (LLM) prompts, designed to automate the generation of academic articles from Python code. Python served as a foundational proof of concept; however, the underlying methodology and framework exhibit adaptability across various GitHub repo's. The development was achieved without reliance on advanced language model agents, ensuring high fidelity in the automated generation of coherent and comprehensive academic content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T16:47:02Z)
• Bridging Research and Readers: A Multi-Modal Automated Academic Papers Interpretation System [47.13932723910289]
  We introduce an open-source multi-modal automated academic paper interpretation system (MMAPIS) with three-step process stages. It employs the hybrid modality preprocessing and alignment module to extract plain text, and tables or figures from documents separately. It then aligns this information based on the section names they belong to, ensuring that data with identical section names are categorized under the same section. It utilizes the extracted section names to divide the article into shorter text segments, facilitating specific summarizations both within and between sections via LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T11:50:53Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.