Minimax Regret Estimation for Generalizing Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Multisite Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11136v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 10:00:07 GMT
• Title: Minimax Regret Estimation for Generalizing Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Multisite Data
• Authors: Yi Zhang, Melody Huang, Kosuke Imai,
• Abstract summary: We develop a robust CATE (conditional average treatment effect) estimation methodology with multisite data from heterogeneous populations. We show that the resulting CATE model has an interpretable closed-form solution, expressed as a weighted average of site-specific CATE models.
• Score: 3.434624857389692
• License:
• Abstract: To test scientific theories and develop individualized treatment rules, researchers often wish to learn heterogeneous treatment effects that can be consistently found across diverse populations and contexts. We consider the problem of generalizing heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) based on data from multiple sites. A key challenge is that a target population may differ from the source sites in unknown and unobservable ways. This means that the estimates from site-specific models lack external validity, and a simple pooled analysis risks bias. We develop a robust CATE (conditional average treatment effect) estimation methodology with multisite data from heterogeneous populations. We propose a minimax-regret framework that learns a generalizable CATE model by minimizing the worst-case regret over a class of target populations whose CATE can be represented as convex combinations of site-specific CATEs. Using robust optimization, the proposed methodology accounts for distribution shifts in both individual covariates and treatment effect heterogeneity across sites. We show that the resulting CATE model has an interpretable closed-form solution, expressed as a weighted average of site-specific CATE models. Thus, researchers can utilize a flexible CATE estimation method within each site and aggregate site-specific estimates to produce the final model. Through simulations and a real-world application, we show that the proposed methodology improves the robustness and generalizability of existing approaches.

Related papers

• U-aggregation: Unsupervised Aggregation of Multiple Learning Algorithms [4.871473117968554]
  We propose an unsupervised model aggregation method, U-aggregation, for enhanced and robust performance in new populations. Unlike existing supervised model aggregation or super learner approaches, U-aggregation assumes no observed labels or outcomes in the target population. We demonstrate its potential real-world application by using U-aggregation to enhance genetic risk prediction of complex traits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T01:42:51Z)
• Improving Bias Correction Standards by Quantifying its Effects on Treatment Outcomes [54.18828236350544]
  Propensity score matching (PSM) addresses selection biases by selecting comparable populations for analysis. Different matching methods can produce significantly different Average Treatment Effects (ATE) for the same task, even when meeting all validation criteria. To address this issue, we introduce a novel metric, A2A, to reduce the number of valid matches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T12:42:24Z)
• Robust CATE Estimation Using Novel Ensemble Methods [0.8246494848934447]
  estimation of Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE) is crucial for understanding the heterogeneity of treatment effects in clinical trials. We evaluate the performance of common methods, including causal forests and various meta-learners, across a diverse set of scenarios. We propose two new ensemble methods that integrate multiple estimators to enhance prediction stability and performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T07:23:02Z)
• Multi-CATE: Multi-Accurate Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation Robust to Unknown Covariate Shifts [12.289361708127876]
  We use methodology for learning multi-accurate predictors to post-process CATE T-learners. We show how this approach can combine (large) confounded observational and (smaller) randomized datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T14:12:25Z)
• Collaborative Heterogeneous Causal Inference Beyond Meta-analysis [68.4474531911361]
  We propose a collaborative inverse propensity score estimator for causal inference with heterogeneous data. Our method shows significant improvements over the methods based on meta-analysis when heterogeneity increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T09:04:36Z)
• Efficient adjustment for complex covariates: Gaining efficiency with DOPE [56.537164957672715]
  We propose a framework that accommodates adjustment for any subset of information expressed by the covariates. Based on our theoretical results, we propose the Debiased Outcome-adapted Propensity Estorimator (DOPE) for efficient estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE) Our results show that the DOPE provides an efficient and robust methodology for ATE estimation in various observational settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T13:02:51Z)
• Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural Controlled Differential Equations [84.42837346400151]
  Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare. Existing causal inference approaches consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions. We propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:15:15Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [62.44901952244514]
  The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects. In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE) We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effect by Data Combination [3.655021726150368]
  It is important to estimate the local average treatment effect (LATE) when compliance with a treatment assignment is incomplete. Previously proposed methods for LATE estimation required all relevant variables to be jointly observed in a single dataset. We propose a weighted least squares estimator that enables simpler model selection by avoiding the minimax objective formulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-11T03:51:48Z)
• Identifiable Energy-based Representations: An Application to Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effects [83.66276516095665]
  Conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) allow us to understand the effect heterogeneity across a large population of individuals. Typical CATE learners assume all confounding variables are measured in order for the CATE to be identifiable. We propose an energy-based model (EBM) that learns a low-dimensional representation of the variables by employing a noise contrastive loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T10:39:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.