On the Role of Model Prior in Real-World Inductive Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13645v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:22:08 GMT
• Title: On the Role of Model Prior in Real-World Inductive Reasoning
• Authors: Zhuo Liu, Ding Yu, Hangfeng He,
• Abstract summary: In real-world applications, Large Language Models' hypothesis generation is shaped by task-specific model priors.<n> removing demonstrations results in minimal loss of hypothesis quality and downstream usage.<n>These insights advance our understanding of the dynamics of hypothesis generation in LLMs.
• Score: 7.962140902232628
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) show impressive inductive reasoning capabilities, enabling them to generate hypotheses that could generalize effectively to new instances when guided by in-context demonstrations. However, in real-world applications, LLMs' hypothesis generation is not solely determined by these demonstrations but is significantly shaped by task-specific model priors. Despite their critical influence, the distinct contributions of model priors versus demonstrations to hypothesis generation have been underexplored. This study bridges this gap by systematically evaluating three inductive reasoning strategies across five real-world tasks with three LLMs. Our empirical findings reveal that, hypothesis generation is primarily driven by the model's inherent priors; removing demonstrations results in minimal loss of hypothesis quality and downstream usage. Further analysis shows the result is consistent across various label formats with different label configurations, and prior is hard to override, even under flipped labeling. These insights advance our understanding of the dynamics of hypothesis generation in LLMs and highlight the potential for better utilizing model priors in real-world inductive reasoning tasks.

Related papers

• I Predict Therefore I Am: Is Next Token Prediction Enough to Learn Human-Interpretable Concepts from Data? [79.01538178959726]
  Large language models (LLMs) have led many to conclude that they exhibit a form of intelligence. We introduce a novel generative model that generates tokens on the basis of human interpretable concepts represented as latent discrete variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T01:21:17Z)
• Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
  Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage. Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes. causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z)
• What Makes In-context Learning Effective for Mathematical Reasoning: A Theoretical Analysis [81.15503859645149]
  In this paper, we aim to theoretically analyze the impact of in-context demonstrations on large language models' reasoning performance.<n>We propose a straightforward, generalizable, and low-complexity demonstration selection method named LMS3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T11:38:11Z)
• MIRAGE: Evaluating and Explaining Inductive Reasoning Process in Language Models [19.81485079689837]
  We evaluate large language models' capabilities in inductive and deductive stages. We find that the models tend to consistently conduct correct deduction without correct inductive rules. In the inductive reasoning process, the model tends to focus on observed facts that are close to the current test example in feature space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T14:12:36Z)
• Graph Stochastic Neural Process for Inductive Few-shot Knowledge Graph Completion [63.68647582680998]
  We focus on a task called inductive few-shot knowledge graph completion (I-FKGC) Inspired by the idea of inductive reasoning, we cast I-FKGC as an inductive reasoning problem. We present a neural process-based hypothesis extractor that models the joint distribution of hypothesis, from which we can sample a hypothesis for predictions. In the second module, based on the hypothesis, we propose a graph attention-based predictor to test if the triple in the query set aligns with the extracted hypothesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-03T13:37:40Z)
• What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis [89.65045443150889]
  Large language models (LLMs) learn a novel task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration, termed in-context learning (ICL) One popular hypothesis explains ICL by task selection. Another popular hypothesis is that ICL is a form of meta-learning, i.e., the models learn a learning algorithm at pre-training time and apply it to the demonstration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T16:15:34Z)
• Comparing Inferential Strategies of Humans and Large Language Models in Deductive Reasoning [25.732397636695882]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) display reasoning patterns akin to those observed in humans. Our research demonstrates that the architecture and scale of the model significantly affect its preferred method of reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T12:58:14Z)
• Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement [92.61557711360652]
  Language models (LMs) often fall short on inductive reasoning, despite achieving impressive success on research benchmarks. We conduct a systematic study of the inductive reasoning capabilities of LMs through iterative hypothesis refinement. We reveal several discrepancies between the inductive reasoning processes of LMs and humans, shedding light on both the potentials and limitations of using LMs in inductive reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T17:51:10Z)
• Learn to Accumulate Evidence from All Training Samples: Theory and Practice [7.257751371276488]
  Evidential deep learning offers a principled and computationally efficient way to turn a deterministic neural network uncertainty-aware. Existing evidential activation functions create zero evidence regions, which prevent the model to learn from training samples falling into such regions. A deeper analysis of evidential activation functions based on our theoretical underpinning inspires the design of a novel regularizer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-19T18:27:12Z)
• Exploring Lexical Irregularities in Hypothesis-Only Models of Natural Language Inference [5.283529004179579]
  Natural Language Inference (NLI) or Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) is the task of predicting the entailment relation between a pair of sentences. Models that understand entailment should encode both, the premise and the hypothesis. Experiments by Poliak et al. revealed a strong preference of these models towards patterns observed only in the hypothesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T01:08:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.