ISSR: Iterative Selection with Self-Review for Vocabulary Test Distractor Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.03462v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 01:45:02 GMT
• Title: ISSR: Iterative Selection with Self-Review for Vocabulary Test Distractor Generation
• Authors: Yu-Cheng Liu, An-Zi Yen,
• Abstract summary: This study focuses on English vocabulary questions from Taiwan's university entrance exams. We propose the iterative selection with self-review (ISSR) framework to ensure that the distractors remain valid while offering diverse options. Experimental results show that ISSR achieves promising performance in generating plausible distractors, and the self-review mechanism effectively filters out distractors that could invalidate the question.
• Score: 4.894055891694307
• License:
• Abstract: Vocabulary acquisition is essential to second language learning, as it underpins all core language skills. Accurate vocabulary assessment is particularly important in standardized exams, where test items evaluate learners' comprehension and contextual use of words. Previous research has explored methods for generating distractors to aid in the design of English vocabulary tests. However, current approaches often rely on lexical databases or predefined rules, and frequently produce distractors that risk invalidating the question by introducing multiple correct options. In this study, we focus on English vocabulary questions from Taiwan's university entrance exams. We analyze student response distributions to gain insights into the characteristics of these test items and provide a reference for future research. Additionally, we identify key limitations in how large language models (LLMs) support teachers in generating distractors for vocabulary test design. To address these challenges, we propose the iterative selection with self-review (ISSR) framework, which makes use of a novel LLM-based self-review mechanism to ensure that the distractors remain valid while offering diverse options. Experimental results show that ISSR achieves promising performance in generating plausible distractors, and the self-review mechanism effectively filters out distractors that could invalidate the question.

Related papers

• One Language, Many Gaps: Evaluating Dialect Fairness and Robustness of Large Language Models in Reasoning Tasks [68.33068005789116]
  We present the first study aimed at objectively assessing the fairness and robustness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in handling dialects in canonical reasoning tasks. We hire AAVE speakers, including experts with computer science backgrounds, to rewrite seven popular benchmarks, such as HumanEval and GSM8K. Our findings reveal that textbfalmost all of these widely used models show significant brittleness and unfairness to queries in AAVE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T18:44:23Z)
• LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Do [2.2469442203227863]
  We conduct a comprehensive analysis of automated evaluators, reporting several key findings on their behavior. We discover that English evaluation capabilities significantly influence language-specific evaluation capabilities, enabling evaluators trained in English to easily transfer their skills to other languages. We find that state-of-the-art evaluators struggle with challenging prompts, in either English or Korean, underscoring their limitations in assessing or generating complex reasoning questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T14:40:02Z)
• Disco-Bench: A Discourse-Aware Evaluation Benchmark for Language Modelling [70.23876429382969]
  We propose a benchmark that can evaluate intra-sentence discourse properties across a diverse set of NLP tasks. Disco-Bench consists of 9 document-level testsets in the literature domain, which contain rich discourse phenomena. For linguistic analysis, we also design a diagnostic test suite that can examine whether the target models learn discourse knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T15:18:25Z)
• A Corpus for Sentence-level Subjectivity Detection on English News Articles [49.49218203204942]
  We use our guidelines to collect NewsSD-ENG, a corpus of 638 objective and 411 subjective sentences extracted from English news articles on controversial topics. Our corpus paves the way for subjectivity detection in English without relying on language-specific tools, such as lexicons or machine translation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T11:54:50Z)
• Tokenization Impacts Multilingual Language Modeling: Assessing Vocabulary Allocation and Overlap Across Languages [3.716965622352967]
  We propose new criteria to evaluate the quality of lexical representation and vocabulary overlap observed in sub-word tokenizers. Our findings show that the overlap of vocabulary across languages can be actually detrimental to certain downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T18:06:49Z)
• Learning to Reuse Distractors to support Multiple Choice Question Generation in Education [19.408786425460498]
  This paper studies how a large existing set of manually created answers and distractors can be leveraged to help teachers in creating new multiple choice questions (MCQs) We built several data-driven models based on context-aware question and distractor representations, and compared them with static feature-based models. Both automatic and human evaluations indicate that context-aware models consistently outperform a static feature-based approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T12:48:56Z)
• Question Personalization in an Intelligent Tutoring System [5.644357169513361]
  We show that generating versions of the questions suitable for students at different levels of subject proficiency improves student learning gains. This insight demonstrates that the linguistic realization of questions in an ITS affects the learning outcomes for students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T15:23:51Z)
• IGLUE: A Benchmark for Transfer Learning across Modalities, Tasks, and Languages [87.5457337866383]
  We introduce the Image-Grounded Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark. IGLUE brings together visual question answering, cross-modal retrieval, grounded reasoning, and grounded entailment tasks across 20 diverse languages. We find that translate-test transfer is superior to zero-shot transfer and that few-shot learning is hard to harness for many tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T18:53:22Z)
• Pedagogical Word Recommendation: A novel task and dataset on personalized vocabulary acquisition for L2 learners [4.507860128918788]
  We propose and release data for a novel task called Pedagogical Word Recommendation. The main goal of PWR is to predict whether a given learner knows a given word based on other words the learner has already seen. As a feature of this ITS, students can directly indicate words they do not know from the questions they solved to create wordbooks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-27T17:52:48Z)
• Analyzing the Limits of Self-Supervision in Handling Bias in Language [52.26068057260399]
  We evaluate how well language models capture the semantics of four tasks for bias: diagnosis, identification, extraction and rephrasing. Our analyses indicate that language models are capable of performing these tasks to widely varying degrees across different bias dimensions, such as gender and political affiliation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T05:36:08Z)
• Structural Pre-training for Dialogue Comprehension [51.215629336320305]
  We present SPIDER, Structural Pre-traIned DialoguE Reader, to capture dialogue exclusive features. To simulate the dialogue-like features, we propose two training objectives in addition to the original LM objectives. Experimental results on widely used dialogue benchmarks verify the effectiveness of the newly introduced self-supervised tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-23T15:16:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.