C-3PO: Compact Plug-and-Play Proxy Optimization to Achieve Human-like Retrieval-Augmented Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06205v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:04:32 GMT
• Title: C-3PO: Compact Plug-and-Play Proxy Optimization to Achieve Human-like Retrieval-Augmented Generation
• Authors: Guoxin Chen, Minpeng Liao, Peiying Yu, Dingmin Wang, Zile Qiao, Chao Yang, Xin Zhao, Kai Fan,
• Abstract summary: C-3PO is a proxy-centric framework that facilitates communication between retrievers and large language models.<n>Our framework implements three specialized agents that collaboratively optimize the entire RAG pipeline.
• Score: 13.120930059424975
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems face a fundamental challenge in aligning independently developed retrievers and large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches typically involve modifying either component or introducing simple intermediate modules, resulting in practical limitations and sub-optimal performance. Inspired by human search behavior -- typically involving a back-and-forth process of proposing search queries and reviewing documents, we propose C-3PO, a proxy-centric framework that facilitates communication between retrievers and LLMs through a lightweight multi-agent system. Our framework implements three specialized agents that collaboratively optimize the entire RAG pipeline without altering the retriever and LLMs. These agents work together to assess the need for retrieval, generate effective queries, and select information suitable for the LLMs. To enable effective multi-agent coordination, we develop a tree-structured rollout approach for reward credit assignment in reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments in both in-domain and out-of-distribution scenarios demonstrate that C-3PO significantly enhances RAG performance while maintaining plug-and-play flexibility and superior generalization capabilities.

Related papers

• Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models. Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining. We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z)
• A Cascading Cooperative Multi-agent Framework for On-ramp Merging Control Integrating Large Language Models [26.459779380808587]
  We introduce the Cascading Cooperative Multi-agent ( CCMA) framework, integrating RL for individual interactions, a fine-tuned Large Language Model (LLM) for regional cooperation, a reward function for global optimization, and the Retrieval-augmented Generation mechanism to dynamically optimize decision-making across complex driving scenarios. Our experiments demonstrate that the CCMA outperforms existing RL methods, demonstrating significant improvements in both micro and macro-level performance in complex driving environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T09:08:04Z)
• EAGER-LLM: Enhancing Large Language Models as Recommenders through Exogenous Behavior-Semantic Integration [60.47645731801866]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly leveraged as foundational backbones in advanced recommender systems. LLMs are pre-trained linguistic semantics but learn collaborative semantics from scratch via the llm-Backbone. We propose EAGER-LLM, a decoder-only generative recommendation framework that integrates endogenous and endogenous behavioral and semantic information in a non-intrusive manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T17:01:57Z)
• Enhancing Language Multi-Agent Learning with Multi-Agent Credit Re-Assignment for Interactive Environment Generalization [37.37641889714614]
  We propose CollabUIAgents, a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework with a novel multi-agent credit re-assignment strategy. We show that our framework improves both performance and cross-environment generalizability of multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T12:26:15Z)
• Towards more Contextual Agents: An extractor-Generator Optimization Framework [0.0]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in solving complex tasks across a wide range of general-purpose applications. However, their performance often degrades in context-specific scenarios, such as specialized industries or research domains. To address this challenge, our work introduces a systematic approach to enhance the contextual adaptability of LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:07:06Z)
• Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [51.54046200512198]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is extensively utilized to incorporate external, current knowledge into large language models.<n>A standard RAG pipeline may comprise several components, such as query rewriting, document retrieval, document filtering, and answer generation.<n>To overcome these challenges, we propose treating the RAG pipeline as a multi-agent cooperative task, with each component regarded as an RL agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T14:24:50Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process.<n>We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Learning to Rank for Multiple Retrieval-Augmented Models through Iterative Utility Maximization [21.115495457454365]
  This paper investigates the design of a unified search engine to serve multiple retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) agents. We introduce an iterative approach where the search engine generates retrieval results for these RAG agents and gathers feedback on the quality of the retrieved documents during an offline phase. We adapt this approach to an online setting, allowing the search engine to refine its behavior based on real-time individual agents feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T17:53:50Z)
• Coevolving with the Other You: Fine-Tuning LLM with Sequential Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [13.753960633998389]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a pivotal technique for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on specific tasks. In this paper, we propose CORY, extending the RL fine-tuning of LLMs to a sequential cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning framework. Results show that CORY outperforms PPO in terms of policy optimality, resistance to distribution collapse, and training robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T14:55:26Z)
• Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation [49.27250832754313]
  We present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework. At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence. We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T02:20:06Z)
• Concept Matching with Agent for Out-of-Distribution Detection [19.407364109506904]
  We propose a new method that integrates the agent paradigm into out-of-distribution (OOD) detection task.<n>Our proposed method, Concept Matching with Agent (CMA), employs neutral prompts as agents to augment the CLIP-based OOD detection process.<n>Our extensive experimental results showcase the superior performance of CMA over both zero-shot and training-required methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T02:27:28Z)
• Learning to Use Tools via Cooperative and Interactive Agents [58.77710337157665]
  Tool learning empowers large language models (LLMs) as agents to use external tools and extend their utility. We propose ConAgents, a Cooperative and interactive Agents framework, which coordinates three specialized agents for tool selection, tool execution, and action calibration separately. Our experiments on three datasets show that the LLMs, when equipped with ConAgents, outperform baselines with substantial improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T15:08:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.