Pareto Optimal Algorithmic Recourse in Multi-cost Function
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07214v1
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:16:08 GMT
- Title: Pareto Optimal Algorithmic Recourse in Multi-cost Function
- Authors: Wen-Ling Chen, Hong-Chang Huang, Kai-Hung Lin, Shang-Wei Hwang, Hao-Tsung Yang,
- Abstract summary: algorithmic recourse aims to identify minimal-cost actions to alter an individual features, thereby obtaining a desired outcome.
Most current recourse mechanisms use gradient-based methods that assume cost functions are differentiable, often not applicable in real-world scenarios.
This work proposes an algorithmic recourse framework that handles nondifferentiable and discrete multi-cost functions.
- Score: 0.44938884406455726
- License:
- Abstract: In decision-making systems, algorithmic recourse aims to identify minimal-cost actions to alter an individual features, thereby obtaining a desired outcome. This empowers individuals to understand, question, or alter decisions that negatively affect them. However, due to the variety and sensitivity of system environments and individual personalities, quantifying the cost of a single function is nearly impossible while considering multiple criteria situations. Most current recourse mechanisms use gradient-based methods that assume cost functions are differentiable, often not applicable in real-world scenarios, resulting in sub-optimal solutions that compromise various criteria. These solutions are typically intractable and lack rigorous theoretical foundations, raising concerns regarding interpretability, reliability, and transparency from the explainable AI (XAI) perspective. To address these issues, this work proposes an algorithmic recourse framework that handles non-differentiable and discrete multi-cost functions. By formulating recourse as a multi-objective optimization problem and assigning weights to different criteria based on their importance, our method identifies Pareto optimal recourse recommendations. To demonstrate scalability, we incorporate the concept of epsilon-net, proving the ability to find approximated Pareto optimal actions. Experiments show the trade-off between different criteria and the methods scalability in large graphs. Compared to current heuristic practices, our approach provides a stronger theoretical foundation and better aligns recourse suggestions with real-world requirements.
Related papers
- Learning Joint Models of Prediction and Optimization [56.04498536842065]
Predict-Then-Then framework uses machine learning models to predict unknown parameters of an optimization problem from features before solving.
This paper proposes an alternative method, in which optimal solutions are learned directly from the observable features by joint predictive models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-07T19:52:14Z) - Differentiation of Multi-objective Data-driven Decision Pipeline [34.577809430781144]
Real-world scenarios frequently involve multi-objective data-driven optimization problems.
Traditional two-stage methods apply a machine learning model to estimate problem coefficients, followed by invoking a solver to tackle the predicted optimization problem.
Recent efforts have focused on end-to-end training of predictive models that use decision loss derived from the downstream optimization problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-02T15:42:03Z) - An Efficient Approach for Solving Expensive Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems [0.0]
An efficient probabilistic selection based constrained multi-objective EA is proposed, referred to as PSCMOEA.
It comprises novel elements such as (a) an adaptive search bound identification scheme based on the feasibility and convergence status of evaluated solutions.
Numerical experiments are conducted on an extensive range of challenging constrained problems using low evaluation budgets to simulate ECMOPs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T02:32:58Z) - Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Bandits [61.740094604552475]
We aim to learn decision policies that optimize an unbiased offline estimate of an online reward metric.
We propose a single framework built on their equivalence in learning scenarios.
Our framework enables us to characterize the variance-optimal unbiased estimator and provide a closed-form solution for it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-09T12:52:22Z) - Predict-Then-Optimize by Proxy: Learning Joint Models of Prediction and
Optimization [59.386153202037086]
Predict-Then- framework uses machine learning models to predict unknown parameters of an optimization problem from features before solving.
This approach can be inefficient and requires handcrafted, problem-specific rules for backpropagation through the optimization step.
This paper proposes an alternative method, in which optimal solutions are learned directly from the observable features by predictive models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-22T01:32:06Z) - Backpropagation of Unrolled Solvers with Folded Optimization [55.04219793298687]
The integration of constrained optimization models as components in deep networks has led to promising advances on many specialized learning tasks.
One typical strategy is algorithm unrolling, which relies on automatic differentiation through the operations of an iterative solver.
This paper provides theoretical insights into the backward pass of unrolled optimization, leading to a system for generating efficiently solvable analytical models of backpropagation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-28T01:50:42Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Search Framework for Multi-Objective Bayesian
Optimization [40.40632890861706]
We consider the problem of multi-objective (MO) blackbox optimization using expensive function evaluations.
We propose a novel uncertainty-aware search framework referred to as USeMO to efficiently select the sequence of inputs for evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-12T16:50:48Z) - Learning Proximal Operators to Discover Multiple Optima [66.98045013486794]
We present an end-to-end method to learn the proximal operator across non-family problems.
We show that for weakly-ized objectives and under mild conditions, the method converges globally.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-28T05:53:28Z) - The Parametric Cost Function Approximation: A new approach for
multistage stochastic programming [4.847980206213335]
We show that a parameterized version of a deterministic optimization model can be an effective way of handling uncertainty without the complexity of either programming or dynamic programming.
This approach can handle complex, high-dimensional state variables, and avoids the usual approximations associated with scenario trees or value function approximations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-01T23:25:09Z) - Fair Incentives for Repeated Engagement [0.46040036610482665]
We study a problem of finding optimal monetary incentive schemes for retention when faced with agents whose participation decisions depend on the incentive they receive.
We show that even in the absence of explicit discrimination, policies may unintentionally discriminate between agents of different types by varying the type composition of the system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-28T04:13:53Z) - Instance-optimality in optimal value estimation: Adaptivity via
variance-reduced Q-learning [99.34907092347733]
We analyze the problem of estimating optimal $Q$-value functions for a discounted Markov decision process with discrete states and actions.
Using a local minimax framework, we show that this functional arises in lower bounds on the accuracy on any estimation procedure.
In the other direction, we establish the sharpness of our lower bounds, up to factors logarithmic in the state and action spaces, by analyzing a variance-reduced version of $Q$-learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-28T00:38:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.