Prioritized Ranking Experimental Design Using Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Platforms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09806v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:48:09 GMT
• Title: Prioritized Ranking Experimental Design Using Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Platforms
• Authors: Mahyar Habibi, Zahra Khanalizadeh, Negar Ziaeian,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel design to mitigate the interference bias in estimating the total average treatment effect (TATE) of item-side interventions in online two-sided marketplaces. Our Two-Sided Prioritized Ranking (TSPR) design uses the recommender system as an instrument for experimentation.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Interdependencies between units in online two-sided marketplaces complicate estimating causal effects in experimental settings. We propose a novel experimental design to mitigate the interference bias in estimating the total average treatment effect (TATE) of item-side interventions in online two-sided marketplaces. Our Two-Sided Prioritized Ranking (TSPR) design uses the recommender system as an instrument for experimentation. TSPR strategically prioritizes items based on their treatment status in the listings displayed to users. We designed TSPR to provide users with a coherent platform experience by ensuring access to all items and a consistent realization of their treatment by all users. We evaluate our experimental design through simulations using a search impression dataset from an online travel agency. Our methodology closely estimates the true simulated TATE, while a baseline item-side estimator significantly overestimates TATE.

Related papers

• Revisiting BPR: A Replicability Study of a Common Recommender System Baseline [78.00363373925758]
  We study the features of the BPR model, indicating their impact on its performance, and investigate open-source BPR implementations. Our analysis reveals inconsistencies between these implementations and the original BPR paper, leading to a significant decrease in performance of up to 50% for specific implementations. We show that the BPR model can achieve performance levels close to state-of-the-art methods on the top-n recommendation tasks and even outperform them on specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T18:39:53Z)
• Estimating Treatment Effects under Recommender Interference: A Structured Neural Networks Approach [13.208141830901845]
  We show that the standard difference-in-means estimator can lead to biased estimates due to recommender interference. We propose a "recommender choice model" that describes which item gets exposed from a pool containing both treated and control items. We show that the proposed estimator yields results comparable to the benchmark, whereas the standard difference-in-means estimator can exhibit significant bias and even produce reversed signs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T14:53:26Z)
• Enhanced Bayesian Optimization via Preferential Modeling of Abstract Properties [49.351577714596544]
  We propose a human-AI collaborative Bayesian framework to incorporate expert preferences about unmeasured abstract properties into surrogate modeling. We provide an efficient strategy that can also handle any incorrect/misleading expert bias in preferential judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:23:13Z)
• Targeted Machine Learning for Average Causal Effect Estimation Using the Front-Door Functional [3.0232957374216953]
  evaluating the average causal effect (ACE) of a treatment on an outcome often involves overcoming the challenges posed by confounding factors in observational studies. Here, we introduce novel estimation strategies for the front-door criterion based on the targeted minimum loss-based estimation theory. We demonstrate the applicability of these estimators to analyze the effect of early stage academic performance on future yearly income.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T22:04:53Z)
• Adaptive Instrument Design for Indirect Experiments [48.815194906471405]
  Unlike RCTs, indirect experiments estimate treatment effects by leveragingconditional instrumental variables. In this paper we take the initial steps towards enhancing sample efficiency for indirect experiments by adaptively designing a data collection policy. Our main contribution is a practical computational procedure that utilizes influence functions to search for an optimal data collection policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T02:38:04Z)
• An IPW-based Unbiased Ranking Metric in Two-sided Markets [3.845857580909374]
  This paper addresses the complex interaction of biases between users in two-sided markets. We propose a new estimator, named two-sided IPW, to address the position bases in two-sided markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T01:44:03Z)
• TCFimt: Temporal Counterfactual Forecasting from Individual Multiple Treatment Perspective [50.675845725806724]
  We propose a comprehensive framework of temporal counterfactual forecasting from an individual multiple treatment perspective (TCFimt) TCFimt constructs adversarial tasks in a seq2seq framework to alleviate selection and time-varying bias and designs a contrastive learning-based block to decouple a mixed treatment effect into separated main treatment effects and causal interactions. The proposed method shows satisfactory performance in predicting future outcomes with specific treatments and in choosing optimal treatment type and timing than state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T15:01:05Z)
• Fair Effect Attribution in Parallel Online Experiments [57.13281584606437]
  A/B tests serve the purpose of reliably identifying the effect of changes introduced in online services. It is common for online platforms to run a large number of simultaneous experiments by splitting incoming user traffic randomly. Despite a perfect randomization between different groups, simultaneous experiments can interact with each other and create a negative impact on average population outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T17:15:51Z)
• Set2setRank: Collaborative Set to Set Ranking for Implicit Feedback based Recommendation [59.183016033308014]
  In this paper, we explore the unique characteristics of the implicit feedback and propose Set2setRank framework for recommendation. Our proposed framework is model-agnostic and can be easily applied to most recommendation prediction approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T08:06:22Z)
• Demarcating Endogenous and Exogenous Opinion Dynamics: An Experimental Design Approach [27.975266406080152]
  In this paper, we design a suite of unsupervised classification methods based on experimental design approaches. We aim to select the subsets of events which minimize different measures of mean estimation error. Our experiments range from validating prediction performance on unsanitized and sanitized events to checking the effect of selecting optimal subsets of various sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T11:38:15Z)
• Efficient Adaptive Experimental Design for Average Treatment Effect Estimation [20.361745967568154]
  We study how to efficiently estimate average treatment effects (ATEs) using adaptive experiments. In adaptive experiments, experimenters sequentially assign treatments to experimental units while updating treatment probabilities based on past data. We develop nonparametric and nonasymptotic confidence intervals that are valid at any round of the proposed design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T02:04:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.