Conversational Planning for Personal Plans

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19500v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 19:04:26 GMT
• Title: Conversational Planning for Personal Plans
• Authors: Konstantina Christakopoulou, Iris Qu, John Canny, Andrew Goodridge, Cj Adams, Minmin Chen, Maja Matarić,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to help with real-life goals or tasks that take a long time to complete.<n>In this work, we explore a novel architecture where the LLM acts as the meta-controller deciding the agent's next macro-action.<n>We show how this paradigm can be applicable in scenarios ranging from tutoring for academic and non-academic tasks to conversational coaching for personal health plans.
• Score: 4.490065350323821
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The language generation and reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have enabled conversational systems with impressive performance in a variety of tasks, from code generation, to composing essays, to passing STEM and legal exams, to a new paradigm for knowledge search. Besides those short-term use applications, LLMs are increasingly used to help with real-life goals or tasks that take a long time to complete, involving multiple sessions across days, weeks, months, or even years. Thus to enable conversational systems for long term interactions and tasks, we need language-based agents that can plan for long horizons. Traditionally, such capabilities were addressed by reinforcement learning agents with hierarchical planning capabilities. In this work, we explore a novel architecture where the LLM acts as the meta-controller deciding the agent's next macro-action, and tool use augmented LLM-based option policies execute the selected macro-action. We instantiate this framework for a specific set of macro-actions enabling adaptive planning for users' personal plans through conversation and follow-up questions collecting user feedback. We show how this paradigm can be applicable in scenarios ranging from tutoring for academic and non-academic tasks to conversational coaching for personal health plans.

Related papers

• Zero-shot Robotic Manipulation with Language-guided Instruction and Formal Task Planning [16.89900521727246]
  We propose an innovative language-guided symbolic task planning (LM-SymOpt) framework with optimization.<n>It is the first expert-free planning framework since we combine the world knowledge from Large Language Models with formal reasoning.<n>Our experimental results show that LM-SymOpt outperforms existing LLM-based planning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T13:33:22Z)
• Large Language Models are Good Multi-lingual Learners : When LLMs Meet Cross-lingual Prompts [5.520335305387487]
  We propose a novel prompting strategy Multi-Lingual Prompt, namely MLPrompt. MLPrompt translates the error-prone rule that an LLM struggles to follow into another language, thus drawing greater attention to it. We introduce a framework integrating MLPrompt with an auto-checking mechanism for structured data generation, with a specific case study in text-to-MIP instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T10:33:27Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• Ask-before-Plan: Proactive Language Agents for Real-World Planning [68.08024918064503]
  Proactive Agent Planning requires language agents to predict clarification needs based on user-agent conversation and agent-environment interaction. We propose a novel multi-agent framework, Clarification-Execution-Planning (textttCEP), which consists of three agents specialized in clarification, execution, and planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T14:07:28Z)
• GOLF: Goal-Oriented Long-term liFe tasks supported by human-AI collaboration [4.414024076524777]
  ChatGPT and similar large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the human-AI interaction and information-seeking process. This research extends the scope of LLM capabilities beyond routine task automation to support users in navigating long-term and significant life tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T18:25:10Z)
• On the Multi-turn Instruction Following for Conversational Web Agents [83.51251174629084]
  We introduce a new task of Conversational Web Navigation, which necessitates sophisticated interactions that span multiple turns with both the users and the environment. We propose a novel framework, named self-reflective memory-augmented planning (Self-MAP), which employs memory utilization and self-reflection techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T02:18:12Z)
• If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code) Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z)
• Learning adaptive planning representations with natural language guidance [90.24449752926866]
  This paper describes Ada, a framework for automatically constructing task-specific planning representations. Ada interactively learns a library of planner-compatible high-level action abstractions and low-level controllers adapted to a particular domain of planning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T23:35:31Z)
• LMRL Gym: Benchmarks for Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning with Language Models [56.25156596019168]
  This paper introduces the LMRL-Gym benchmark for evaluating multi-turn RL for large language models (LLMs) Our benchmark consists of 8 different language tasks, which require multiple rounds of language interaction and cover a range of tasks in open-ended dialogue and text games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T03:59:31Z)
• Understanding the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Automated Planning [24.37599752610625]
  The study seeks to shed light on the capabilities of LLMs in solving complex planning problems. It provides insights into the most effective approaches for using LLMs in this context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T15:21:09Z)
• SGP-TOD: Building Task Bots Effortlessly via Schema-Guided LLM Prompting [43.02058641501056]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional proficiency in conversational engagement. We introduce SGP-TOD,Guided Prompting for building Task-Oriented Dialog systems effortlessly. SGP-TOD comprises three components: a LLM for engaging with users, a DST Prompter to aid the LLM with dialog state tracking, and a Policy Prompter to elicit proper responses adhering to the provided dialog policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T23:29:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.