Reassessing the boundary between classical and nonclassicalfor individual quantum processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05884v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 19:09:45 GMT
• Title: Reassessing the boundary between classical and nonclassicalfor individual quantum processes
• Authors: Yujie Zhang, David Schmid, Yìlè Yīng, Robert W. Spekkens,
• Abstract summary: We show that this notion can be leveraged to define a classical-nonclassical divide for individual quantum processes of arbitrary type.<n>We begin the task of characterizing where the classical-nonclassical divide lies according to this proposal for a variety of different types of processes.
• Score: 9.7383000873479
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: There is a received wisdom about where to draw the boundary between classical and nonclassical for various types of quantum processes. For instance, for multipartite states, it is the divide between separable and entangled, for channels, the divide between entanglement-breaking and not, for sets of measurements, the divide between compatible and incompatible, and for assemblages, the divide between steerable and unsteerable. However, no unified justification of these placements of the classical-nonclassical divide has been proposed. That is, although each might be motivated by some notion of what it means to be classically explainable, it is not the same notion for all of them. One well-motivated notion of classical explainability is the one based on generalized noncontextuality: a set of circuits is classically explainable if the statistics they generate can be realized by a generalized-noncontextual ontological model. In this work, we show that this notion can be leveraged to define a classical-nonclassical divide for individual quantum processes of arbitrary type. A set of measurements is judged to be classical if and only if a particular set of circuits -- the one obtained by contracting these measurements with every possible quantum state -- is classically explainable in the sense just articulated. We begin the task of characterizing where the classical-nonclassical divide lies according to this proposal for a variety of different types of processes. In particular, we show that all of the following are judged to be nonclassical: every entangled state, every set of incompatible measurements, every non-entanglement-breaking channel, every steerable assemblage. However, it also judges certain subsets of the complementary classes to be nonclassical, i.e., certain separable states, compatible sets of measurements, entanglement-breaking channels, and unsteerable assemblages.

Related papers

• Operationally classical simulation of quantum states [41.94295877935867]
  A classical state-preparation device cannot generate superpositions and hence its emitted states must commute.<n>We show that no such simulation exists, thereby certifying quantum coherence.<n>Our approach is a possible avenue to understand how and to what extent quantum states defy generic models based on classical devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T15:25:03Z)
• Kochen-Specker for many qubits and the classical limit [55.2480439325792]
  It is shown that quantum and classical predictions converge as the number of qubits is increases to the macroscopic scale.<n>This way to explain the classical limit concurs with, and improves, a result previously reported for GHZ states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T22:30:58Z)
• Minimal operational theories: classical theories with quantum features [41.94295877935867]
  We introduce a class of probabilistic theories, where system dynamics are constrained to the minimal set of operations.<n>Specifically, the allowed instruments are limited to those derived from compositions of preparations, measurements, swap transformations, and conditional tests.<n>We demonstrate that minimal theories with conditioning and a spanning set of non-separable states satisfy two quantum no-go theorems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T16:24:09Z)
• Fermionic anyons: entanglement and quantum computation from a resource-theoretic perspective [39.58317527488534]
  We develop a framework to characterize the separability of a specific type of one-dimensional quasiparticle known as a fermionic anyon. We map this notion of fermionic-anyon separability to the free resources of matchgate circuits. We also identify how entanglement between two qubits encoded in a dual-rail manner, as standard for matchgate circuits, corresponds to the notion of entanglement between fermionic anyons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T15:25:19Z)
• Bell Nonlocality in Classical Systems Coexisting with other System Types [0.1874930567916036]
  We show that classical theory can in principle be falsified if classical systems coexist with other types of physical systems. We show that measurements outcomes in classical theory cannot be regarded as pre-determined by the state of an underlying reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T01:01:21Z)
• Unifying different notions of quantum incompatibility into a strict hierarchy of resource theories of communication [60.18814584837969]
  We introduce the notion of q-compatibility, which unifies different notions of POVMs, channels, and instruments incompatibility. We are able to pinpoint exactly what each notion of incompatibility consists of, in terms of information-theoretic resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T21:33:31Z)
• Quantum-Classical Hybrid Systems and their Quasifree Transformations [0.0]
  We study continuous variable systems in which quantum and classical degrees of freedom are combined and treated on the same footing. This allows a unified treatment of a large variety of quantum operations involving measurements or dependence on classical parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-09T19:51:10Z)
• Contrary Inferences for Classical Histories within the Consistent Histories Formulation of Quantum Theory [0.0]
  We show that paradoxes involving contextuality persist even in the semi-classical limit. We consider different consistent sets for the arrival time of a semi-classical wave packet in an infinite square well. Surprisingly, we get consistent sets that disagree on whether the motion of the semi-classical system, that started within a subregion, ever left that subregion or not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T15:43:42Z)
• Comment on "Vindication of entanglement-based witnesses of non-classicality in hybrid systems" [0.48733623015338234]
  Models of quantum-classical interactions fall into two classes: those which allow the generation of entanglement via a classical mediator, and those which do not. We show that known members of the first class fail to model the mediator as a 'classical' system, and are nonlocal. It follows that there are models permitting the generation of entanglement via quantum-classical interactions that lie outside the remit of the theorem cited by Marconato and Marletto.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T10:18:35Z)
• A Unified Combination of Classical and Quantum Systems [0.0]
  We show how to overcome the two separate languages of classical and quantum systems. Our presentation begins with familiar methods that are limited to basic, conventional, canonical quantum mechanical examples. In the final sections we illustrate how alternative quantization procedures, e.g., spin and affine quantizations, can also have smooth paths between classical and quantum stories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T01:12:42Z)
• Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe [68.8204255655161]
  Three notions are often assumed to be essentially equivalent, representing different facets of the same phenomenon. We analyze them in general Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker space-times through the lens of geometric structures on the classical phase space. The analysis shows that: (i) inflation does not play an essential role; classical behavior can emerge much more generally; (ii) the three notions are conceptually distinct; classicality can emerge in one sense but not in another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T16:38:25Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.