Contrary Inferences for Classical Histories within the Consistent Histories Formulation of Quantum Theory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15893v2
• Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 14:16:07 GMT
• Title: Contrary Inferences for Classical Histories within the Consistent Histories Formulation of Quantum Theory
• Authors: Adamantia Zampeli, Georgios E. Pavlou, Petros Wallden
• Abstract summary: We show that paradoxes involving contextuality persist even in the semi-classical limit. We consider different consistent sets for the arrival time of a semi-classical wave packet in an infinite square well. Surprisingly, we get consistent sets that disagree on whether the motion of the semi-classical system, that started within a subregion, ever left that subregion or not.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the histories formulation of quantum theory, sets of coarse-grained histories, that are called consistent, obey classical probability rules. It has been argued that these sets can describe the semi-classical behaviour of closed quantum systems. Most physical scenarios admit multiple different consistent sets and one can view each consistent set as a separate context. Using propositions from different consistent sets to make inferences leads to paradoxes such as the contrary inferences first noted by Kent [Physical Review Letters, 78(15):2874, 1997]. Proponents of the consistent histories formulation argue that one should not mix propositions coming from different consistent sets in making logical arguments, and that paradoxes such as the aforementioned contrary inferences are nothing else than the usual microscopic paradoxes of quantum contextuality as first demonstrated by Kochen and Specker theorem. In this contribution we use the consistent histories to describe a macroscopic (semi-classical) system to show that paradoxes involving contextuality (mixing different consistent sets) persist even in the semi-classical limit. This is distinctively different from the contextuality of standard quantum theory, where the contextuality paradoxes do not persist in the semi-classical limit. Specifically, we consider different consistent sets for the arrival time of a semi-classical wave packet in an infinite square well. Surprisingly, we get consistent sets that disagree on whether the motion of the semi-classical system, that started within a subregion, ever left that subregion or not. Our results point to the need for constraints, additional to the consistency condition, to recover the correct semi-classical limit in this formalism and lead to the motto `all consistent sets are equal', but `some consistent sets are more equal than others'.

Related papers

• Reassessing the boundary between classical and nonclassicalfor individual quantum processes [9.7383000873479]
  We show that this notion can be leveraged to define a classical-nonclassical divide for individual quantum processes of arbitrary type. We begin the task of characterizing where the classical-nonclassical divide lies according to this proposal for a variety of different types of processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T19:09:45Z)
• Kochen-Specker for many qubits and the classical limit [55.2480439325792]
  It is shown that quantum and classical predictions converge as the number of qubits is increases to the macroscopic scale. This way to explain the classical limit concurs with, and improves, a result previously reported for GHZ states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T22:30:58Z)
• Generalized Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering Paradox [18.5699135339787]
  We present a generalized EPR steering paradox, which predicts a contradictory equality $2_Q=left( 1+deltaright)_C$. We test the paradox through a two-setting steering protocol, and find that the state is steerable if some specific measurement requirements are satisfied. Our construction also enlightens the building of EPR steering inequality, which may contribute to some schemes for typical quantum teleportation and quantum key distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T01:25:11Z)
• From integrability to chaos: the quantum-classical correspondence in a triple well bosonic model [0.0]
  We investigate the semiclassical limit of a bosonic quantum many-body system exhibiting both integrable and chaotic behavior. The transition from regularity to chaos in classical dynamics is visualized through Poincar'e sections. The study systematically establishes quantum-classical correspondence for a bosonic many-body system with more than two wells.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T06:31:00Z)
• Probing quantum chaos with the entropy of decoherent histories [0.0]
  Quantum chaos, a phenomenon that began to be studied in the last century, still does not have a rigorous understanding. We propose the quantum chaos definition in the manner similar to the classical one using decoherent histories as a quantum analogue of trajectories. We show that for such a model, the production of entropy of decoherent histories is radically different in integrable and chaotic regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T21:57:05Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [69.62715388742298]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics. We show how a de Finetti-like representation theorem for finitely exchangeable sequences requires a mathematical representation which is formally equivalent to quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• Three little paradoxes: making sense of semiclassical gravity [0.0]
  I show that an experiment by Page and Geilker does not exclude such a semiclassical theory. I present a classification of semiclassical models defined by the way in which the wave function collapse is introduced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T16:54:49Z)
• Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics and Copenhagen Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We show how the a classical world used in such formulations is not to something to be postulated but rather explained by suitable sets of alternative histories of quasiclassical variables. We discuss the general definition of measurement, the collapse of the wave function, and irreversibility from the perspective of decoherent histories quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T00:18:50Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Quantum chaos in the spin coherent state representation [0.0]
  We use spin coherent states to compare classical and quantum evolution of a simple paradigmatic, discrete-time quantum dynamical system. In the paper, we presented a different way by comparing evolution of appropriately defined moments of classical and quantum distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T15:04:40Z)
• Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe [68.8204255655161]
  Three notions are often assumed to be essentially equivalent, representing different facets of the same phenomenon. We analyze them in general Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker space-times through the lens of geometric structures on the classical phase space. The analysis shows that: (i) inflation does not play an essential role; classical behavior can emerge much more generally; (ii) the three notions are conceptually distinct; classicality can emerge in one sense but not in another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T16:38:25Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.