Towards Improving Reward Design in RL: A Reward Alignment Metric for RL Practitioners

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05996v1
• Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 00:38:17 GMT
• Title: Towards Improving Reward Design in RL: A Reward Alignment Metric for RL Practitioners
• Authors: Calarina Muslimani, Kerrick Johnstonbaugh, Suyog Chandramouli, Serena Booth, W. Bradley Knox, Matthew E. Taylor,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning agents are fundamentally limited by the quality of the reward functions they learn from.<n>We introduce the Trajectory Alignment Coefficient to quantify the similarity between a human stakeholder's ranking of trajectory distributions and those induced by a given reward function.
• Score: 15.25763345316458
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning agents are fundamentally limited by the quality of the reward functions they learn from, yet reward design is often overlooked under the assumption that a well-defined reward is readily available. However, in practice, designing rewards is difficult, and even when specified, evaluating their correctness is equally problematic: how do we know if a reward function is correctly specified? In our work, we address these challenges by focusing on reward alignment -- assessing whether a reward function accurately encodes the preferences of a human stakeholder. As a concrete measure of reward alignment, we introduce the Trajectory Alignment Coefficient to quantify the similarity between a human stakeholder's ranking of trajectory distributions and those induced by a given reward function. We show that the Trajectory Alignment Coefficient exhibits desirable properties, such as not requiring access to a ground truth reward, invariance to potential-based reward shaping, and applicability to online RL. Additionally, in an 11 -- person user study of RL practitioners, we found that access to the Trajectory Alignment Coefficient during reward selection led to statistically significant improvements. Compared to relying only on reward functions, our metric reduced cognitive workload by 1.5x, was preferred by 82% of users and increased the success rate of selecting reward functions that produced performant policies by 41%.

Related papers

• ORSO: Accelerating Reward Design via Online Reward Selection and Policy Optimization [41.074747242532695]
  Online Reward Selection and Policy Optimization (ORSO) is a novel approach that frames the selection of shaping reward function as an online model selection problem.<n>ORSO significantly reduces the amount of data required to evaluate a shaping reward function, resulting in superior data efficiency and a significant reduction in computational time (up to 8 times)<n>ORSO consistently identifies high-quality reward functions outperforming prior methods by more than 50% and on average identifies policies as performant as the ones learned using manually engineered reward functions by domain experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:55:05Z)
• Hindsight PRIORs for Reward Learning from Human Preferences [3.4990427823966828]
  Preference based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) removes the need to hand specify a reward function by learning a reward from preference feedback over policy behaviors. Current approaches to PbRL do not address the credit assignment problem inherent in determining which parts of a behavior most contributed to a preference. We introduce a credit assignment strategy (Hindsight PRIOR) that uses a world model to approximate state importance within a trajectory and then guides rewards to be proportional to state importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T21:59:42Z)
• Informativeness of Reward Functions in Reinforcement Learning [34.40155383189179]
  We study the problem of designing informative reward functions so that the designed rewards speed up the agent's convergence. Existing works have considered several different reward design formulations. We propose a reward informativeness criterion that adapts w.r.t. the agent's current policy and can be optimized under specified structural constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T18:36:42Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Bagged Reward [46.16904382582698]
  In Reinforcement Learning (RL), it is commonly assumed that an immediate reward signal is generated for each action taken by the agent. In many real-world scenarios, designing immediate reward signals is difficult. We propose a novel reward redistribution method equipped with a bidirectional attention mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T07:26:44Z)
• REBEL: Reward Regularization-Based Approach for Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and human preferences can lead to catastrophic outcomes in the real world.<n>Recent methods aim to mitigate misalignment by learning reward functions from human preferences.<n>We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• Deep Reinforcement Learning from Hierarchical Preference Design [99.46415116087259]
  This paper shows by exploiting certain structures, one can ease the reward design process. We propose a hierarchical reward modeling framework -- HERON for scenarios: (I) The feedback signals naturally present hierarchy; (II) The reward is sparse, but with less important surrogate feedback to help policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T00:44:29Z)
• Would I have gotten that reward? Long-term credit assignment by counterfactual contribution analysis [50.926791529605396]
  We introduce Counterfactual Contribution Analysis (COCOA), a new family of model-based credit assignment algorithms. Our algorithms achieve precise credit assignment by measuring the contribution of actions upon obtaining subsequent rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T09:27:27Z)
• Mind the Gap: Offline Policy Optimization for Imperfect Rewards [14.874900923808408]
  We propose a unified offline policy optimization approach, textitRGM (Reward Gap Minimization), which can handle diverse types of imperfect rewards. By exploiting the duality of the lower layer, we derive a tractable algorithm that enables sampled-based learning without any online interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T11:39:50Z)
• Symbol Guided Hindsight Priors for Reward Learning from Human Preferences [2.512827436728378]
  We present the PRIor Over Rewards (PRIOR) framework, which incorporates priors about the structure of the reward function and the preference feedback into the reward learning process. We demonstrate that using an abstract state space for the computation of the priors further improves the reward learning and the agent's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T14:57:06Z)
• Basis for Intentions: Efficient Inverse Reinforcement Learning using Past Experience [89.30876995059168]
  inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior. This paper addresses the problem of IRL -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-09T17:29:49Z)
• Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning [88.34958680436552]
  We present an exploration method specifically for preference-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Our main idea is to design an intrinsic reward by measuring the novelty based on learned reward. Our experiments show that exploration bonus from uncertainty in learned reward improves both feedback- and sample-efficiency of preference-based RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T23:22:10Z)
• Information Directed Reward Learning for Reinforcement Learning [64.33774245655401]
  We learn a model of the reward function that allows standard RL algorithms to achieve high expected return with as few expert queries as possible. In contrast to prior active reward learning methods designed for specific types of queries, IDRL naturally accommodates different query types. We support our findings with extensive evaluations in multiple environments and with different types of queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T18:46:42Z)
• Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward Shaping [71.214923471669]
  Reward shaping is an effective technique for incorporating domain knowledge into reinforcement learning (RL) In this paper, we consider the problem of adaptively utilizing a given shaping reward function. Experiments in sparse-reward cartpole and MuJoCo environments show that our algorithms can fully exploit beneficial shaping rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T05:34:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.