Threefold model for AI Readiness: A Case Study with Finnish Healthcare SMEs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14527v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 18:37:29 GMT
• Title: Threefold model for AI Readiness: A Case Study with Finnish Healthcare SMEs
• Authors: Mohammed Alnajjar, Khalid Alnajjar, Mika Hämäläinen,
• Abstract summary: This study examines AI adoption among Finnish healthcare SMEs through semi-structured interviews with six health-tech companies.<n>We identify three AI engagement categories: AI-curious (exploring AI), AI-embracing (integrating AI), and AI-catering (providing AI solutions)<n>Our proposed threefold model highlights key adoption barriers, including regulatory complexities, technical expertise gaps, and financial constraints.
• Score: 1.5839621757142595
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This study examines AI adoption among Finnish healthcare SMEs through semi-structured interviews with six health-tech companies. We identify three AI engagement categories: AI-curious (exploring AI), AI-embracing (integrating AI), and AI-catering (providing AI solutions). Our proposed threefold model highlights key adoption barriers, including regulatory complexities, technical expertise gaps, and financial constraints. While SMEs recognize AI's potential, most remain in early adoption stages. We provide actionable recommendations to accelerate AI integration, focusing on regulatory reforms, talent development, and inter-company collaboration, offering valuable insights for healthcare organizations, policymakers, and researchers.

Related papers

• Assessing AI Adoption and Digitalization in SMEs: A Framework for Implementation [0.0]
  There is a significant gap between SMEs and large corporations in their use of AI. This study identifies critical drivers and obstacles to achieving intelligent transformation. It proposes a framework model to address key challenges and provide actionable guidelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T15:10:25Z)
• Strategic AI adoption in SMEs: A Prescriptive Framework [0.0]
  The adoption of AI technologies in SMEs faces significant barriers, primarily related to cost, lack of technical skills, and employee acceptance. This study proposes a comprehensive, phased framework designed to facilitate the effective adoption of AI in SMEs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T09:49:37Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Synergizing Human-AI Agency: A Guide of 23 Heuristics for Service Co-Creation with LLM-Based Agents [16.560339524456268]
  This study serves as a primer for interested service providers to determine if and how Large Language Models (LLMs) technology will be integrated for their practitioners and the broader community. We investigate the mutual learning journey of non-AI experts and AI through CoAGent, a service co-creation tool with LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T16:11:48Z)
• FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
  Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Exploring the Assessment List for Trustworthy AI in the Context of Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems [5.386962356892352]
  The European Commission appointed experts to a High-Level Expert Group on AI (AI-HLEG) AI-HLEG defined Trustworthy AI as 1) lawful, 2) ethical, and 3) robust and specified seven corresponding key requirements. We present an illustrative case study from applying ALTAI to an ongoing development project of an Advanced Driver-Assistance System.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T21:48:11Z)
• Progressing Towards Responsible AI [2.191505742658975]
  Observatory on Society and Artificial Intelligence (OSAI) grew out of the project AI4EU. OSAI aims to stimulate reflection on a broad spectrum of issues of AI (ethical, legal, social, economic and cultural)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T09:46:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.