AgentRxiv: Towards Collaborative Autonomous Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18102v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:16:42 GMT
• Title: AgentRxiv: Towards Collaborative Autonomous Research
• Authors: Samuel Schmidgall, Michael Moor,
• Abstract summary: AgentRxiv lets agents collaborate toward research goals and enables researchers to accelerate discovery.<n>We find that the best performing strategy generalizes to benchmarks in other domains.<n>These findings suggest that autonomous agents may play a role in designing future AI systems alongside humans.
• Score: 3.583084119066612
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Progress in scientific discovery is rarely the result of a single "Eureka" moment, but is rather the product of hundreds of scientists incrementally working together toward a common goal. While existing agent workflows are capable of producing research autonomously, they do so in isolation, without the ability to continuously improve upon prior research results. To address these challenges, we introduce AgentRxiv-a framework that lets LLM agent laboratories upload and retrieve reports from a shared preprint server in order to collaborate, share insights, and iteratively build on each other's research. We task agent laboratories to develop new reasoning and prompting techniques and find that agents with access to their prior research achieve higher performance improvements compared to agents operating in isolation (11.4% relative improvement over baseline on MATH-500). We find that the best performing strategy generalizes to benchmarks in other domains (improving on average by 3.3%). Multiple agent laboratories sharing research through AgentRxiv are able to work together towards a common goal, progressing more rapidly than isolated laboratories, achieving higher overall accuracy (13.7% relative improvement over baseline on MATH-500). These findings suggest that autonomous agents may play a role in designing future AI systems alongside humans. We hope that AgentRxiv allows agents to collaborate toward research goals and enables researchers to accelerate discovery.

Related papers

• MACC: Multi-Agent Collaborative Competition for Scientific Exploration [16.92873230140957]
  We introduce MACC (Multi-Agent Collaborative Competition), an institutional architecture that integrates a blackboard-style shared scientific workspace with incentive mechanisms.<n> MACC provides a testbed for studying how institutional design influences scalable and reliable multi-agent scientific exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T06:38:04Z)
• AIRS-Bench: a Suite of Tasks for Frontier AI Research Science Agents [49.67355440164857]
  We introduce AIRS-Bench, a suite of 20 tasks sourced from state-of-the-art machine learning papers.<n>Airs-Bench tasks assess agentic capabilities over the full research lifecycle.<n>We open-source the AIRS-Bench task definitions and evaluation code to catalyze further development in autonomous scientific research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T16:45:02Z)
• AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite [75.58737079136942]
  We present AstaBench, a suite that provides the first holistic measure of agentic ability to perform scientific research.<n>Our suite comes with the first scientific research environment with production-grade search tools.<n>Our evaluation of 57 agents across 22 agent classes reveals several interesting findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T17:10:26Z)
• Agentic Discovery: Closing the Loop with Cooperative Agents [7.618433247743826]
  We see the rate of discovery increasingly limited by human decision-making tasks.<n>We postulate that cooperative agents are needed to augment the role of humans and enable autonomous discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T01:50:41Z)
• LIMI: Less is More for Agency [49.63355240818081]
  LIMI (Less Is More for Intelligent Agency) demonstrates that agency follows radically different development principles.<n>We show that sophisticated agentic intelligence can emerge from minimal but strategically curated demonstrations of autonomous behavior.<n>Our findings establish the Agency Efficiency Principle: machine autonomy emerges not from data abundance but from strategic curation of high-quality agentic demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T10:59:32Z)
• SciMaster: Towards General-Purpose Scientific AI Agents, Part I. X-Master as Foundation: Can We Lead on Humanity's Last Exam? [51.112225746095746]
  We introduce X-Master, a tool-augmented reasoning agent designed to emulate human researchers.<n>X-Masters sets a new state-of-the-art record on Humanity's Last Exam with a score of 32.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:50:52Z)
• ScienceBoard: Evaluating Multimodal Autonomous Agents in Realistic Scientific Workflows [82.07367406991678]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their impact beyond Natural Language Processing.<n>Among these, computer-using agents are capable of interacting with operating systems as humans do.<n>We introduce ScienceBoard, which encompasses a realistic, multi-domain environment featuring dynamic and visually rich scientific software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T12:27:27Z)
• InternAgent: When Agent Becomes the Scientist -- Building Closed-Loop System from Hypothesis to Verification [24.752098402554743]
  InternAgent is a unified closed-loop multi-agent framework to conduct Autonomous Scientific Research.<n>It has demonstrated its versatility across 12 scientific research tasks.<n>It has achieved promising performance gains in several scientific fields with significantly less time cost compared to human efforts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T17:27:43Z)
• MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents [51.9387884953294]
  We introduce Meta MLGym and MLGym-Bench, a new framework and benchmark for evaluating and developing large language models on AI research tasks. This is the first Gym environment for machine learning (ML) tasks, enabling research on reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for training such agents. We evaluate a number of frontier large language models (LLMs) on our benchmarks such as Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Llama-3.1 405B, GPT-4o, o1-preview, and Gemini-1.5 Pro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T12:28:23Z)
• Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants [26.588095150057384]
  Agent Laboratory is an autonomous framework capable of completing the entire research process.<n>It accepts a human-provided research idea and progresses through three stages--literature review, experimentation, and report writing.<n>Agent Laboratory significantly reduces research expenses, achieving an 84% decrease compared to previous autonomous research methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T01:58:42Z)
• Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration [51.452664740963066]
  Collaborative Gym is a framework enabling asynchronous, tripartite interaction among agents, humans, and task environments.<n>We instantiate Co-Gym with three representative tasks in both simulated and real-world conditions.<n>Our findings reveal that collaborative agents consistently outperform their fully autonomous counterparts in task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T09:21:15Z)
• DrugAgent: Automating AI-aided Drug Discovery Programming through LLM Multi-Agent Collaboration [24.65716292347949]
  DrugAgent is a multi-agent framework that automates machine learning (ML) programming for drug discovery tasks.<n>Our results show that DrugAgent consistently outperforms leading baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T03:06:59Z)
• Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM-Based Multi-Agent System [62.832818186789545]
  Virtual Scientists (VirSci) is a multi-agent system designed to mimic the teamwork inherent in scientific research. VirSci organizes a team of agents to collaboratively generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas. We show that this multi-agent approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in producing novel scientific ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:16:22Z)
• CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark [11.794931453828974]
  CORE-Bench is a benchmark consisting of 270 tasks based on 90 scientific papers across three disciplines (computer science, social science, and medicine) We provide an evaluation system to measure the accuracy of agents in a fast and parallelizable way. The best agent achieved an accuracy of 21% on the hardest task, showing the vast scope for improvement in automating routine scientific tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T17:13:19Z)
• ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models [56.08917291606421]
  ResearchAgent is an AI-based system for ideation and operationalization of novel work. ResearchAgent automatically defines novel problems, proposes methods and designs experiments, while iteratively refining them. We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T13:36:29Z)
• ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models [89.53040828210945]
  ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
• Learning to Incentivize Other Learning Agents [73.03133692589532]
  We show how to equip RL agents with the ability to give rewards directly to other agents, using a learned incentive function. Such agents significantly outperform standard RL and opponent-shaping agents in challenging general-sum Markov games. Our work points toward more opportunities and challenges along the path to ensure the common good in a multi-agent future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:12:38Z)
• Individual specialization in multi-task environments with multiagent reinforcement learners [0.0]
  There is a growing interest in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) as the first steps towards building general intelligent agents. Previous results point us towards increased conditions for coordination, efficiency/fairness, and common-pool resource sharing. We further study coordination in multi-task environments where several rewarding tasks can be performed and thus agents don't necessarily need to perform well in all tasks, but under certain conditions may specialize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-29T15:20:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.