Advancing AI-Scientist Understanding: Making LLM Think Like a Physicist with Interpretable Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01911v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 17:13:16 GMT
• Title: Advancing AI-Scientist Understanding: Making LLM Think Like a Physicist with Interpretable Reasoning
• Authors: Yinggan Xu, Hana Kimlee, Yijia Xiao, Di Luo,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are playing an expanding role in physics research by enhancing reasoning, symbolic manipulation, and numerical computation.<n>We conceptualize the collaboration between AI and human scientists as a dynamic interplay among three modules: the reasoning module, the interpretation module, and the AI-scientist interaction module.
• Score: 0.7499722271664147
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are playing an expanding role in physics research by enhancing reasoning, symbolic manipulation, and numerical computation. However, ensuring the reliability and interpretability of their outputs remains a significant challenge. In our framework, we conceptualize the collaboration between AI and human scientists as a dynamic interplay among three modules: the reasoning module, the interpretation module, and the AI-scientist interaction module. Recognizing that effective physics reasoning demands rigorous logical consistency, quantitative precision, and deep integration with established theoretical models, we introduce the interpretation module to improve the understanding of AI-generated outputs, which is not previously explored in the literature. This module comprises multiple specialized agents, including summarizers, model builders, UI builders, and testers, which collaboratively structure LLM outputs within a physically grounded framework, by constructing a more interpretable science model. A case study demonstrates that our approach enhances transparency, facilitates validation, and strengthens AI-augmented reasoning in scientific discovery.

Related papers

• Video Event Reasoning and Prediction by Fusing World Knowledge from LLMs with Vision Foundation Models [10.1080193179562]
  Current understanding models excel at recognizing "what" but fall short in high-level cognitive tasks like causal reasoning and future prediction.<n>We propose a novel framework that fuses a powerful Vision Foundation Model for deep visual perception with a Large Language Model (LLM) serving as a knowledge-driven reasoning core.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T09:43:17Z)
• Computational Thinking Reasoning in Large Language Models [69.28428524878885]
  Computational Thinking Model (CTM) is a novel framework that incorporates computational thinking paradigms into large language models (LLMs)<n>Live code execution is seamlessly integrated into the reasoning process, allowing CTM to think by computing.<n>CTM outperforms conventional reasoning models and tool-augmented baselines in terms of accuracy, interpretability, and generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:11:15Z)
• Perception, Reason, Think, and Plan: A Survey on Large Multimodal Reasoning Models [79.52467430114805]
  Reasoning lies at the heart of intelligence, shaping the ability to make decisions, draw conclusions, and generalize across domains.<n>In artificial intelligence, as systems increasingly operate in open, uncertain, and multimodal environments, reasoning becomes essential for enabling robust and adaptive behavior.<n>Large Multimodal Reasoning Models (LMRMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm, integrating modalities such as text, images, audio, and video to support complex reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T03:35:23Z)
• Modular Machine Learning: An Indispensable Path towards New-Generation Large Language Models [45.05285463251872]
  We introduce a novel learning paradigm -- Modular Machine Learning (MML) -- as an essential approach toward new-generation large language models (LLMs) MML decomposes the complex structure of LLMs into three interdependent components: modular representation, modular model, and modular reasoning. We present a feasible implementation of MML-based LLMs via leveraging advanced techniques such as disentangled representation learning, neural architecture search and neuro-symbolic learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T17:42:02Z)
• LogiDynamics: Unraveling the Dynamics of Logical Inference in Large Language Model Reasoning [49.58786377307728]
  This paper adopts an exploratory approach by introducing a controlled evaluation environment for analogical reasoning. We analyze the comparative dynamics of inductive, abductive, and deductive inference pipelines. We investigate advanced paradigms such as hypothesis selection, verification, and refinement, revealing their potential to scale up logical inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T15:54:53Z)
• MAPS: Advancing Multi-Modal Reasoning in Expert-Level Physical Science [62.96434290874878]
  Current Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLM) have shown strong capabilities in general visual reasoning tasks.<n>We develop a new framework, named Multi-Modal Scientific Reasoning with Physics Perception and Simulation (MAPS) based on an MLLM.<n>MAPS decomposes expert-level multi-modal reasoning task into physical diagram understanding via a Physical Perception Model (PPM) and reasoning with physical knowledge via a simulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-18T13:54:00Z)
• Large Physics Models: Towards a collaborative approach with Large Language Models and Foundation Models [8.320153035338418]
  This paper explores ideas and provides a potential roadmap for the development and evaluation of physics-specific large-scale AI models.<n>These models, based on foundation models such as Large Language Models (LLMs) are tailored to address the demands of physics research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T17:11:22Z)
• In Defence of Post-hoc Explainability [0.0]
  We introduce Computational Interpretabilism (CI) as a philosophical framework for post-hoc interpretability in scientific AI.<n> Drawing parallels with human expertise, where post-hoc rationalisation coexists with reliable performance, CI establishes that scientific knowledge emerges through structured model interpretation when properly bounded by empirical validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T06:22:03Z)
• Interpreting token compositionality in LLMs: A robustness analysis [10.777646083061395]
  Constituent-Aware Pooling (CAP) is a methodology designed to analyse how large language models process linguistic structures.<n>CAP intervenes in model activations through constituent-based pooling at various model levels.<n>Our findings highlight fundamental limitations in current transformer architectures regarding compositional semantics processing and model interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T18:10:50Z)
• The Buffer Mechanism for Multi-Step Information Reasoning in Language Models [52.77133661679439]
  Investigating internal reasoning mechanisms of large language models can help us design better model architectures and training strategies. In this study, we constructed a symbolic dataset to investigate the mechanisms by which Transformer models employ vertical thinking strategy. We proposed a random matrix-based algorithm to enhance the model's reasoning ability, resulting in a 75% reduction in the training time required for the GPT-2 model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T07:41:26Z)
• LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery [141.39722070734737]
  We propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of Large Language Models with the computational strength of simulations. We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework. We conduct experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in law discovery and molecular design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T03:04:10Z)
• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• Disentangling Reasoning Capabilities from Language Models with Compositional Reasoning Transformers [72.04044221898059]
  ReasonFormer is a unified reasoning framework for mirroring the modular and compositional reasoning process of humans. The representation module (automatic thinking) and reasoning modules (controlled thinking) are disentangled to capture different levels of cognition. The unified reasoning framework solves multiple tasks with a single model,and is trained and inferred in an end-to-end manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T13:39:55Z)
• DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
  We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models. Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.