Quantum Optimization Benchmark Library -- The Intractable Decathlon

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03832v1
• Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 18:00:00 GMT
• Title: Quantum Optimization Benchmark Library -- The Intractable Decathlon
• Authors: Thorsten Koch, David E. Bernal Neira, Ying Chen, Giorgio Cortiana, Daniel J. Egger, Raoul Heese, Narendra N. Hegade, Alejandro Gomez Cadavid, Rhea Huang, Toshinari Itoko, Thomas Kleinert, Pedro Maciel Xavier, Naeimeh Mohseni, Jhon A. Montanez-Barrera, Koji Nakano, Giacomo Nannicini, Corey O'Meara, Justin Pauckert, Manuel Proissl, Anurag Ramesh, Maximilian Schicker, Noriaki Shimada, Mitsuharu Takeori, Victor Valls, David Van Bulck, Stefan Woerner, Christa Zoufal,
• Abstract summary: We present ten optimization problem classes that are difficult for existing classical algorithms.<n>The individual properties of the problem classes vary in terms of objective and variable type, coefficient ranges, and density.<n>We introduce the Quantum Optimization Benchmark Library (QOBLIB) where the problem instances and solution track records can be found.
• Score: 27.362963067036087
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Through recent progress in hardware development, quantum computers have advanced to the point where benchmarking of (heuristic) quantum algorithms at scale is within reach. Particularly in combinatorial optimization -- where most algorithms are heuristics -- it is key to empirically analyze their performance on hardware and track progress towards quantum advantage. To this extent, we present ten optimization problem classes that are difficult for existing classical algorithms and can (mostly) be linked to practically-relevant applications, with the goal to enable systematic, fair, and comparable benchmarks for quantum optimization methods. Further, we introduce the Quantum Optimization Benchmark Library (QOBLIB) where the problem instances and solution track records can be found. The individual properties of the problem classes vary in terms of objective and variable type, coefficient ranges, and density. Crucially, they all become challenging for established classical methods already at system sizes ranging from less than 100 to, at most, an order of 100,000 decision variables, allowing to approach them with today's quantum computers. We reference the results from state-of-the-art solvers for instances from all problem classes and demonstrate exemplary baseline results obtained with quantum solvers for selected problems. The baseline results illustrate a standardized form to present benchmarking solutions, which has been designed to ensure comparability of the used methods, reproducibility of the respective results, and trackability of algorithmic and hardware improvements over time. We encourage the optimization community to explore the performance of available classical or quantum algorithms and hardware platforms with the benchmarking problem instances presented in this work toward demonstrating quantum advantage in optimization.

Related papers

• A Practical Cross-Platform, Multi-Algorithm Study of Quantum Optimisation for Configurational Analysis of Materials [0.0]
  We consider the well-studied problem of configurational analysis of materials and, more specifically, finding the lowest energy configuration of defective graphene structures. This problem acts as a test-case which allows us to study various algorithms that are applicable to Quadratic Unconstrained Binary optimisation problems. We employ quantum methods to solve fully-connected QUBOs of up to $72$, and find that algorithm performance beyond this is restricted by device connectivity, noise and classical time overheads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T13:38:44Z)
• Quantum Annealing for Combinatorial Optimization: A Benchmarking Study [39.125366249242646]
  We show that a state-of-the-art quantum solver has higher accuracy (0.013%) and a significantly faster problem-solving time (6,561x) than the best classical solver. Our results highlight the advantages of leveraging QA over classical counterparts, particularly in hybrid configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T16:43:24Z)
• Bayesian Parameterized Quantum Circuit Optimization (BPQCO): A task and hardware-dependent approach [49.89480853499917]
  Variational quantum algorithms (VQA) have emerged as a promising quantum alternative for solving optimization and machine learning problems. In this paper, we experimentally demonstrate the influence of the circuit design on the performance obtained for two classification problems. We also study the degradation of the obtained circuits in the presence of noise when simulating real quantum computers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T11:00:12Z)
• Variational Quantum Multi-Objective Optimization [5.381539115778766]
  We present a variational quantum optimization algorithm to solve discrete multi-objective optimization problems on quantum computers. We show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm on several benchmark problems with up to five objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T18:59:21Z)
• Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Optimization [14.7608536260003]
  Recent advances in quantum computers are demonstrating the ability to solve problems at a scale beyond brute force classical simulation. Across computer science and physics, there are different approaches for major optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T19:00:44Z)
• Randomized Benchmarking of Local Zeroth-Order Optimizers for Variational Quantum Systems [65.268245109828]
  We compare the performance of classicals across a series of partially-randomized tasks. We focus on local zeroth-orders due to their generally favorable performance and query-efficiency on quantum systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T02:13:26Z)
• Quantum algorithms: A survey of applications and end-to-end complexities [90.05272647148196]
  The anticipated applications of quantum computers span across science and industry. We present a survey of several potential application areas of quantum algorithms. We outline the challenges and opportunities in each area in an "end-to-end" fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T17:53:55Z)
• A Review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its Variants [47.89542334125886]
  The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a highly promising variational quantum algorithm that aims to solve intractable optimization problems. This comprehensive review offers an overview of the current state of QAOA, encompassing its performance analysis in diverse scenarios. We conduct a comparative study of selected QAOA extensions and variants, while exploring future prospects and directions for the algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T15:28:12Z)
• Optimization Applications as Quantum Performance Benchmarks [0.0]
  Combinatorial optimization is anticipated to be one of the primary use cases for quantum computation in the coming years. Inspired by existing methods to characterize classical optimization algorithms, we analyze the solution quality obtained by solving Max-Cut problems. This is used to guide the development of an advanced benchmarking framework for quantum computers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-05T01:56:06Z)
• Automatic and effective discovery of quantum kernels [41.61572387137452]
  Quantum computing can empower machine learning models by enabling kernel machines to leverage quantum kernels for representing similarity measures between data.<n>We present an approach to this problem, which employs optimization techniques, similar to those used in neural architecture search and AutoML.<n>The results obtained by testing our approach on a high-energy physics problem demonstrate that, in the best-case scenario, we can either match or improve testing accuracy with respect to the manual design approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T16:42:14Z)
• Variational Quantum Optimization with Multi-Basis Encodings [62.72309460291971]
  We introduce a new variational quantum algorithm that benefits from two innovations: multi-basis graph complexity and nonlinear activation functions. Our results in increased optimization performance, two increase in effective landscapes and a reduction in measurement progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T20:16:02Z)
• Accelerating variational quantum algorithms with multiple quantum processors [78.36566711543476]
  Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have the potential of utilizing near-term quantum machines to gain certain computational advantages. Modern VQAs suffer from cumbersome computational overhead, hampered by the tradition of employing a solitary quantum processor to handle large data. Here we devise an efficient distributed optimization scheme, called QUDIO, to address this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T08:18:42Z)
• Cross Entropy Hyperparameter Optimization for Constrained Problem Hamiltonians Applied to QAOA [68.11912614360878]
  Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms such as Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) are considered as one of the most encouraging approaches for taking advantage of near-term quantum computers in practical applications. Such algorithms are usually implemented in a variational form, combining a classical optimization method with a quantum machine to find good solutions to an optimization problem. In this study we apply a Cross-Entropy method to shape this landscape, which allows the classical parameter to find better parameters more easily and hence results in an improved performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-11T13:52:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.