Towards generalizable single-cell perturbation modeling via the Conditional Monge Gap
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08328v1
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 07:51:33 GMT
- Title: Towards generalizable single-cell perturbation modeling via the Conditional Monge Gap
- Authors: Alice Driessen, Benedek Harsanyi, Marianna Rapsomaniki, Jannis Born,
- Abstract summary: Conditional Monge Gap learns OT maps conditionally on arbitrary co variables.<n>We find that our conditional models achieve results comparable to condition-specific state-of-the-art on scRNA-seq.<n>We also narrow the gap between structure-based and effect-based drug representations, suggesting a promising path to the successful prediction of perturbation effects for unseen treatments.
- Score: 1.437446768735628
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Learning the response of single-cells to various treatments offers great potential to enable targeted therapies. In this context, neural optimal transport (OT) has emerged as a principled methodological framework because it inherently accommodates the challenges of unpaired data induced by cell destruction during data acquisition. However, most existing OT approaches are incapable of conditioning on different treatment contexts (e.g., time, drug treatment, drug dosage, or cell type) and we still lack methods that unanimously show promising generalization performance to unseen treatments. Here, we propose the Conditional Monge Gap which learns OT maps conditionally on arbitrary covariates. We demonstrate its value in predicting single-cell perturbation responses conditional to one or multiple drugs, a drug dosage, or combinations thereof. We find that our conditional models achieve results comparable and sometimes even superior to the condition-specific state-of-the-art on scRNA-seq as well as multiplexed protein imaging data. Notably, by aggregating data across conditions we perform cross-task learning which unlocks remarkable generalization abilities to unseen drugs or drug dosages, widely outperforming other conditional models in capturing heterogeneity (i.e., higher moments) in the perturbed population. Finally, by scaling to hundreds of conditions and testing on unseen drugs, we narrow the gap between structure-based and effect-based drug representations, suggesting a promising path to the successful prediction of perturbation effects for unseen treatments.
Related papers
- Minimax Regret Estimation for Generalizing Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Multisite Data [3.434624857389692]
We develop a robust CATE (conditional average treatment effect) estimation methodology with multisite data from heterogeneous populations.
We show that the resulting CATE model has an interpretable closed-form solution, expressed as a weighted average of site-specific CATE models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-15T10:00:07Z) - Counterfactual Generative Models for Time-Varying Treatments [15.208067770012283]
Estimating the counterfactual outcome of treatment is essential for decision-making in public health and clinical science.
We propose a novel conditional generative framework capable of producing counterfactual samples under time-varying treatment.
We present a thorough evaluation of our method using both synthetic and real-world data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T05:45:53Z) - B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under
Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding.
We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z) - Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural
Controlled Differential Equations [84.42837346400151]
Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare.
Existing causal inference approaches consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions.
We propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T17:15:15Z) - Generalization bounds and algorithms for estimating conditional average
treatment effect of dosage [13.867315751451494]
We investigate the task of estimating the conditional average causal effect of treatment-dosage pairs from a combination of observational data and assumptions on the causal relationships in the underlying system.
This has been a longstanding challenge for fields of study such as epidemiology or economics that require a treatment-dosage pair to make decisions.
We show empirically new state-of-the-art performance results across several benchmark datasets for this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-29T15:26:59Z) - Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment
Effects [62.44901952244514]
The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects.
In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE)
We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z) - SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event
Data [83.50281440043241]
We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data.
We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z) - On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation [91.3755431537592]
We investigate how to exploit structural similarities of an individual's potential outcomes (POs) under different treatments.
We compare three end-to-end learning strategies to overcome this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T16:30:46Z) - A Twin Neural Model for Uplift [59.38563723706796]
Uplift is a particular case of conditional treatment effect modeling.
We propose a new loss function defined by leveraging a connection with the Bayesian interpretation of the relative risk.
We show our proposed method is competitive with the state-of-the-art in simulation setting and on real data from large scale randomized experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-11T16:02:39Z) - Estimating heterogeneous survival treatment effect in observational data
using machine learning [9.951103976634407]
Methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effect in observational data have largely focused on continuous or binary outcomes.
Using flexible machine learning methods in the counterfactual framework is a promising approach to address challenges due to complex individual characteristics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-17T01:02:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.