Beyond the Generative Learning Trilemma: Generative Model Assessment in Data Scarcity Domains
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10555v1
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:15:44 GMT
- Title: Beyond the Generative Learning Trilemma: Generative Model Assessment in Data Scarcity Domains
- Authors: Marco Salmè, Lorenzo Tronchin, Rosa Sicilia, Paolo Soda, Valerio Guarrasi,
- Abstract summary: Deep Generative Models (DGMs) produce synthetic data that satisfies the Generative Learning Trilemma: fidelity, diversity, and sampling efficiency.<n>We extend the trilemma to include utility, robustness, and privacy, factors crucial for ensuring the applicability of DGMs in real-world scenarios.<n>This study broadens the scope of the Generative Learning Trilemma, aligning it with real-world demands and providing actionable guidance for selecting DGMs tailored to specific applications.
- Score: 1.2769300783938085
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Data scarcity remains a critical bottleneck impeding technological advancements across various domains, including but not limited to medicine and precision agriculture. To address this challenge, we explore the potential of Deep Generative Models (DGMs) in producing synthetic data that satisfies the Generative Learning Trilemma: fidelity, diversity, and sampling efficiency. However, recognizing that these criteria alone are insufficient for practical applications, we extend the trilemma to include utility, robustness, and privacy, factors crucial for ensuring the applicability of DGMs in real-world scenarios. Evaluating these metrics becomes particularly challenging in data-scarce environments, as DGMs traditionally rely on large datasets to perform optimally. This limitation is especially pronounced in domains like medicine and precision agriculture, where ensuring acceptable model performance under data constraints is vital. To address these challenges, we assess the Generative Learning Trilemma in data-scarcity settings using state-of-the-art evaluation metrics, comparing three prominent DGMs: Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and Diffusion Models (DMs). Furthermore, we propose a comprehensive framework to assess utility, robustness, and privacy in synthetic data generated by DGMs. Our findings demonstrate varying strengths among DGMs, with each model exhibiting unique advantages based on the application context. This study broadens the scope of the Generative Learning Trilemma, aligning it with real-world demands and providing actionable guidance for selecting DGMs tailored to specific applications.
Related papers
- A Comprehensive Survey of Synthetic Tabular Data Generation [27.112327373017457]
Tabular data is one of the most prevalent and critical data formats across diverse real-world applications.
It is often constrained by challenges such as data scarcity, privacy concerns, and class imbalance.
Synthetic data generation has emerged as a promising solution, leveraging generative models to learn the distribution of real datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-23T08:33:34Z) - PALATE: Peculiar Application of the Law of Total Expectation to Enhance the Evaluation of Deep Generative Models [0.5499796332553708]
Deep generative models (DGMs) have caused a paradigm shift in the field of machine learning.<n>A comprehensive evaluation of these models that accounts for the trichotomy between fidelity, diversity, and novelty in generated samples remains a formidable challenge.<n>We propose PALATE, a novel enhancement to the evaluation of DGMs that addresses limitations of existing metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-24T09:06:45Z) - Deep Generative Models with Hard Linear Equality Constraints [24.93865980946986]
We propose a probabilistically sound approach for enforcing the hard constraints into DGMs to generate constraint-compliant data.<n>We carry out experiments with various DGM model architectures over five image datasets and three scientific applications.<n>Ours not only guarantees the satisfaction of constraints in generation but also archives superior generative performance than the other methods across every benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T02:53:32Z) - Generate to Discriminate: Expert Routing for Continual Learning [59.71853576559306]
Generate to Discriminate (G2D) is a continual learning method that leverages synthetic data to train a domain-discriminator.<n>We observe that G2D outperforms competitive domain-incremental learning methods on tasks in both vision and language modalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T13:16:28Z) - KIPPS: Knowledge infusion in Privacy Preserving Synthetic Data
Generation [0.0]
Generative Deep Learning models struggle to model discrete and non-Gaussian features that have domain constraints.
Generative models create synthetic data that repeats sensitive features, which is a privacy risk.
This paper proposes a novel model, KIPPS, that infuses Domain and Regulatory Knowledge from Knowledge Graphs into Generative Deep Learning models for enhanced Privacy Preserving Synthetic data generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-25T19:50:03Z) - Artificial Inductive Bias for Synthetic Tabular Data Generation in Data-Scarce Scenarios [8.062368743143388]
We propose a novel methodology for generating realistic and reliable synthetic data with Deep Generative Models (DGMs) in limited real-data environments.
Our approach proposes several ways to generate an artificial inductive bias in a DGM through transfer learning and meta-learning techniques.
We validate our approach using two state-of-the-art DGMs, namely, a Variational Autoencoder and a Generative Adversarial Network, to show that our artificial inductive bias fuels superior synthetic data quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T12:53:42Z) - GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models [56.63218531256961]
We introduce GenBench, a benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models.
GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies.
We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-01T08:01:05Z) - How Realistic Is Your Synthetic Data? Constraining Deep Generative
Models for Tabular Data [57.97035325253996]
We show how Constrained Deep Generative Models (C-DGMs) can be transformed into realistic synthetic data models.
C-DGMs are able to exploit the background knowledge expressed by the constraints to outperform their standard counterparts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T13:22:05Z) - Model Stealing Attack against Graph Classification with Authenticity, Uncertainty and Diversity [80.16488817177182]
GNNs are vulnerable to the model stealing attack, a nefarious endeavor geared towards duplicating the target model via query permissions.
We introduce three model stealing attacks to adapt to different actual scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T05:42:31Z) - Genetic InfoMax: Exploring Mutual Information Maximization in
High-Dimensional Imaging Genetics Studies [50.11449968854487]
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are used to identify relationships between genetic variations and specific traits.
Representation learning for imaging genetics is largely under-explored due to the unique challenges posed by GWAS.
We introduce a trans-modal learning framework Genetic InfoMax (GIM) to address the specific challenges of GWAS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-26T03:59:21Z) - GS-WGAN: A Gradient-Sanitized Approach for Learning Differentially
Private Generators [74.16405337436213]
We propose Gradient-sanitized Wasserstein Generative Adrial Networks (GS-WGAN)
GS-WGAN allows releasing a sanitized form of sensitive data with rigorous privacy guarantees.
We find our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches across multiple metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-15T10:01:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.