Vision language models are unreliable at trivial spatial cognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16061v1
• Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 17:38:01 GMT
• Title: Vision language models are unreliable at trivial spatial cognition
• Authors: Sangeet Khemlani, Tyler Tran, Nathaniel Gyory, Anthony M. Harrison, Wallace E. Lawson, Ravenna Thielstrom, Hunter Thompson, Taaren Singh, J. Gregory Trafton,
• Abstract summary: Vision language models (VLMs) are designed to extract relevant visuospatial information from images.<n>We develop a benchmark dataset -- TableTest -- whose images depict 3D scenes of objects arranged on a table, and used it to evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs.<n>Results show that performance could be degraded by minor variations of prompts that use equivalent descriptions.
• Score: 0.2902243522110345
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision language models (VLMs) are designed to extract relevant visuospatial information from images. Some research suggests that VLMs can exhibit humanlike scene understanding, while other investigations reveal difficulties in their ability to process relational information. To achieve widespread applicability, VLMs must perform reliably, yielding comparable competence across a wide variety of related tasks. We sought to test how reliable these architectures are at engaging in trivial spatial cognition, e.g., recognizing whether one object is left of another in an uncluttered scene. We developed a benchmark dataset -- TableTest -- whose images depict 3D scenes of objects arranged on a table, and used it to evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs. Results show that performance could be degraded by minor variations of prompts that use logically equivalent descriptions. These analyses suggest limitations in how VLMs may reason about spatial relations in real-world applications. They also reveal novel opportunities for bolstering image caption corpora for more efficient training and testing.

Related papers

• Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [14.442394137843923]
  We present a detailed analysis that first delineates the core elements of spatial reasoning.<n>We then assesses the performance of these models in both synthetic and real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T14:34:06Z)
• Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas [52.478956204238315]
  We study the spatial reasoning challenge from the lens of mechanistic interpretability. We observe that successful spatial reasoning correlates strongly with the model's ability to align its attention with actual object locations. Motivated by these findings, we propose ADAPTVIS to sharpen the attention on highly relevant regions when confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T17:57:03Z)
• LayoutVLM: Differentiable Optimization of 3D Layout via Vision-Language Models [57.92316645992816]
  Spatial reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human cognition, enabling intuitive understanding and manipulation of objects in three-dimensional space.<n>We introduce LayoutVLM, a framework and scene layout representation that exploits the semantic knowledge of Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>We demonstrate that fine-tuning VLMs with the proposed scene layout representation extracted from existing scene datasets can improve their reasoning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T06:15:04Z)
• Teaching VLMs to Localize Specific Objects from In-context Examples [56.797110842152]
  We find that present-day Vision-Language Models (VLMs) lack a fundamental cognitive ability: learning to localize specific objects in a scene by taking into account the context.<n>This work is the first to explore and benchmark personalized few-shot localization for VLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T13:34:22Z)
• Coarse Correspondences Boost Spatial-Temporal Reasoning in Multimodal Language Model [51.83436609094658]
  We introduce Coarse Correspondences, a simple lightweight method that enhances MLLMs' spatial-temporal reasoning with 2D images as input. Our method uses a lightweight tracking model to identify primary object correspondences between frames in a video or across different image viewpoints. We demonstrate that this simple training-free approach brings substantial gains to GPT4-V/O consistently on four benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T17:57:12Z)
• Unlocking Textual and Visual Wisdom: Open-Vocabulary 3D Object Detection Enhanced by Comprehensive Guidance from Text and Image [70.02187124865627]
  Open-vocabulary 3D object detection (OV-3DDet) aims to localize and recognize both seen and previously unseen object categories within any new 3D scene. We leverage a vision foundation model to provide image-wise guidance for discovering novel classes in 3D scenes. We demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy and generalization, highlighting the potential of foundation models in advancing open-vocabulary 3D object detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T04:50:04Z)
• VSP: Assessing the dual challenges of perception and reasoning in spatial planning tasks for VLMs [102.36953558562436]
  Vision language models (VLMs) are an exciting emerging class of language models (LMs) One understudied capability inVLMs is visual spatial planning. Our study introduces a benchmark that evaluates the spatial planning capability in these models in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T00:24:01Z)
• GSR-BENCH: A Benchmark for Grounded Spatial Reasoning Evaluation via Multimodal LLMs [3.2688425993442696]
  The ability to understand and reason about spatial relationships between objects in images is an important component of visual reasoning. We extend the previously released What'sUp dataset and propose a novel comprehensive evaluation for spatial relationship understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T06:15:26Z)
• Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
  Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z)
• Leveraging VLM-Based Pipelines to Annotate 3D Objects [68.51034848207355]
  We propose an alternative algorithm to marginalize over factors such as the viewpoint that affect the VLM's response. Instead of merging text-only responses, we utilize the VLM's joint image-text likelihoods. We show how a VLM-based pipeline can be leveraged to produce reliable annotations for 764K objects from the 764K dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T17:54:22Z)
• Can Vision-Language Models be a Good Guesser? Exploring VLMs for Times and Location Reasoning [23.33600235294496]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are expected to be capable of reasoning with commonsense knowledge as human beings. This makes us wonder if, based on visual cues, Vision-Language Models can achieve and even outperform human's capability in reasoning times and location. We propose a two-stage recognitionspace and reasoningspace probing task, applied to discriminative and generative VLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T13:46:28Z)
• VIPHY: Probing "Visible" Physical Commonsense Knowledge [22.00069189468524]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown remarkable performance on visual reasoning tasks. We evaluate their ability to acquire "visible" physical knowledge. Our results indicate a severe gap between model and human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T02:06:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.