Assessing Racial Disparities in Healthcare Expenditures Using Causal Path-Specific Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.21688v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:23:50 GMT
• Title: Assessing Racial Disparities in Healthcare Expenditures Using Causal Path-Specific Effects
• Authors: Xiaxian Ou, Xinwei He, David Benkeser, Razieh Nabi,
• Abstract summary: This study employs causal and counterfactual path-specific effects to quantify how various factors, including socioeconomic status, insurance access, health behaviors, and health status, mediate these disparities.<n>We estimate how expenditures would differ under counterfactual scenarios in which the values of specific mediators were aligned across racial groups along selected causal pathways.
• Score: 4.357338639836869
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Racial disparities in healthcare expenditures are well-documented, yet the underlying drivers remain complex and require further investigation. This study employs causal and counterfactual path-specific effects to quantify how various factors, including socioeconomic status, insurance access, health behaviors, and health status, mediate these disparities. Using data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, we estimate how expenditures would differ under counterfactual scenarios in which the values of specific mediators were aligned across racial groups along selected causal pathways. A key challenge in this analysis is ensuring robustness against model misspecification while addressing the zero-inflation and right-skewness of healthcare expenditures. For reliable inference, we derive asymptotically linear estimators by integrating influence function-based techniques with flexible machine learning methods, including super learners and a two-part model tailored to the zero-inflated, right-skewed nature of healthcare expenditures.

Related papers

• Healthcare cost prediction for heterogeneous patient profiles using deep learning models with administrative claims data [0.0]
  This study is grounded in socio-technical considerations that emphasize the interplay between technical systems and humanistic outcomes.<n>We propose a channel-wise deep learning framework that mitigates data heterogeneity by segmenting AC data into separate channels.<n>The proposed channel-wise models reduce prediction errors by 23% compared to single-channel models, leading to 16.4% and 19.3% reductions in overpayments and underpayments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T19:20:41Z)
• Fairness in Computational Innovations: Identifying Bias in Substance Use Treatment Length of Stay Prediction Models with Policy Implications [0.477529483515826]
  Predictive machine learning (ML) models are computational innovations that can enhance medical decision-making.<n>However, societal biases can be encoded into such models, raising concerns about inadvertently affecting health outcomes for disadvantaged groups.<n>This issue is particularly pressing in the context of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, where biases in predictive models could significantly impact the recovery of highly vulnerable patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T06:47:23Z)
• Using Backbone Foundation Model for Evaluating Fairness in Chest Radiography Without Demographic Data [2.7436483977171333]
  This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of using the backbone of Foundation Models as an embedding extractor. We propose utilizing these groups in different stages of bias mitigation, including pre-processing, in-processing, and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T20:35:38Z)
• The Impact of Differential Feature Under-reporting on Algorithmic Fairness [86.275300739926]
  We present an analytically tractable model of differential feature under-reporting. We then use to characterize the impact of this kind of data bias on algorithmic fairness. Our results show that, in real world data settings, under-reporting typically leads to increasing disparities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T19:16:22Z)
• The Role of Subgroup Separability in Group-Fair Medical Image Classification [18.29079361470428]
  We find a relationship between subgroup separability, subgroup disparities, and performance degradation when models are trained on data with systematic bias such as underdiagnosis. Our findings shed new light on the question of how models become biased, providing important insights for the development of fair medical imaging AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T06:06:47Z)
• A Causal Framework for Decomposing Spurious Variations [68.12191782657437]
  We develop tools for decomposing spurious variations in Markovian and Semi-Markovian models. We prove the first results that allow a non-parametric decomposition of spurious effects. The described approach has several applications, ranging from explainable and fair AI to questions in epidemiology and medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:40:28Z)
• Counterpart Fairness -- Addressing Systematic between-group Differences in Fairness Evaluation [17.495053606192375]
  When using machine learning to aid decision-making, it is critical to ensure that an algorithmic decision is fair and does not discriminate against specific individuals/groups. Existing group fairness methods aim to ensure equal outcomes across groups delineated by protected variables like race or gender. In cases where systematic differences between groups play a significant role in outcomes, these methods may overlook the influence of non-protected variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T15:41:12Z)
• The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Health Disparities [0.0]
  We examined data from the US Census and the CDC to determine the degree to which specific socioeconomic factors correlate with both specific and general health metrics. Our results indicate that certain socioeconomic factors, like income and educational attainment, are highly correlated with aggregate measures of health.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T00:00:40Z)
• Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review [90.22219142430146]
  We analyze the intersection of fairness in machine learning and healthcare disparities. We provide a critical review of the associated fairness metrics from a machine learning standpoint. We propose several new research directions that hold promise for developing ethical and equitable ML applications in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T04:32:10Z)
• Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
  Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools. We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z)
• Measuring Fairness of Text Classifiers via Prediction Sensitivity [63.56554964580627]
  ACCUMULATED PREDICTION SENSITIVITY measures fairness in machine learning models based on the model's prediction sensitivity to perturbations in input features. We show that the metric can be theoretically linked with a specific notion of group fairness (statistical parity) and individual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T15:00:33Z)
• Measuring Outcomes in Healthcare Economics using Artificial Intelligence: with Application to Resource Management [0.0]
  In most cases, such events lead to critical uncertainties in decision making, as well as in multiple medical and economic aspects at a hospital. This manuscript presents three data-driven methods that help healthcare managers organize their economics and identify the most optimum plan for resources allocation and sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T02:39:39Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Statistical discrimination in learning agents [64.78141757063142]
  Statistical discrimination emerges in agent policies as a function of both the bias in the training population and of agent architecture. We show that less discrimination emerges with agents that use recurrent neural networks, and when their training environment has less bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T18:28:57Z)
• Measuring Fairness Under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A Quantification-Based Approach [131.20444904674494]
  We tackle the problem of measuring group fairness under unawareness of sensitive attributes. We show that quantification approaches are particularly suited to tackle the fairness-under-unawareness problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-17T13:45:46Z)
• Estimating and Improving Fairness with Adversarial Learning [65.99330614802388]
  We propose an adversarial multi-task training strategy to simultaneously mitigate and detect bias in the deep learning-based medical image analysis system. Specifically, we propose to add a discrimination module against bias and a critical module that predicts unfairness within the base classification model. We evaluate our framework on a large-scale public-available skin lesion dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T03:10:32Z)
• Targeted VAE: Variational and Targeted Learning for Causal Inference [39.351088248776435]
  Undertaking causal inference with observational data is incredibly useful across a wide range of tasks. There are two significant challenges associated with undertaking causal inference using observational data. We address these two challenges by combining structured inference and targeted learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T16:55:24Z)
• Predictive Modeling of ICU Healthcare-Associated Infections from Imbalanced Data. Using Ensembles and a Clustering-Based Undersampling Approach [55.41644538483948]
  This work is focused on both the identification of risk factors and the prediction of healthcare-associated infections in intensive-care units. The aim is to support decision making addressed at reducing the incidence rate of infections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T16:13:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.