MIRAGE: A Multi-modal Benchmark for Spatial Perception, Reasoning, and Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10604v2
• Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 01:22:36 GMT
• Title: MIRAGE: A Multi-modal Benchmark for Spatial Perception, Reasoning, and Intelligence
• Authors: Chonghan Liu, Haoran Wang, Felix Henry, Pu Miao, Yajie Zhang, Yu Zhao, Peiran Wu,
• Abstract summary: MIRAGE is a benchmark designed to evaluate models' capabilities in Counting (object attribute recognition), Relation (spatial relational reasoning), and Counting with Relation.<n>By targeting these foundational abilities, MIRAGE provides a pathway toward spatial recognition towardtemporal reasoning in future research.
• Score: 14.694404760882986
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Spatial perception and reasoning are core components of human cognition, encompassing object recognition, spatial relational understanding, and dynamic reasoning. Despite progress in computer vision, existing benchmarks reveal significant gaps in models' abilities to accurately recognize object attributes and reason about spatial relationships, both essential for dynamic reasoning. To address these limitations, we propose MIRAGE, a multi-modal benchmark designed to evaluate models' capabilities in Counting (object attribute recognition), Relation (spatial relational reasoning), and Counting with Relation. Through diverse and complex scenarios requiring fine-grained recognition and reasoning, MIRAGE highlights critical limitations in state-of-the-art models, underscoring the need for improved representations and reasoning frameworks. By targeting these foundational abilities, MIRAGE provides a pathway toward spatiotemporal reasoning in future research.

Related papers

• Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Interwoven Thinking and Visual Drawing [62.447497430479174]
  Drawing to reason in space is a novel paradigm that enables LVLMs to reason through elementary drawing operations in the visual space.<n>Our model, named VILASR, consistently outperforms existing methods across diverse spatial reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T17:41:50Z)
• EOC-Bench: Can MLLMs Identify, Recall, and Forecast Objects in an Egocentric World? [52.99661576320663]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have driven breakthroughs in egocentric vision applications.<n>EOC-Bench is an innovative benchmark designed to systematically evaluate object-centric embodied cognition in dynamic egocentric scenarios.<n>We conduct comprehensive evaluations of various proprietary, open-source, and object-level MLLMs based on EOC-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T17:44:12Z)
• SITE: towards Spatial Intelligence Thorough Evaluation [121.1493852562597]
  Spatial intelligence (SI) represents a cognitive ability encompassing the visualization, manipulation, and reasoning about spatial relationships.<n>We introduce SITE, a benchmark dataset towards SI Thorough Evaluation.<n>Our approach to curating the benchmark combines a bottom-up survey about 31 existing datasets and a top-down strategy drawing upon three classification systems in cognitive science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T17:45:44Z)
• VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity [34.29409506366145]
  VERIFY is a benchmark designed to isolate and rigorously evaluate the visual reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs.<n>Each problem is accompanied by a human-annotated reasoning path, making it the first to provide in-depth evaluation of model decision-making processes.<n>We propose novel metrics that assess visual reasoning fidelity beyond mere accuracy, highlighting critical imbalances in current model reasoning patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T16:26:11Z)
• On the Reasoning Capacity of AI Models and How to Quantify It [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have intensified the debate surrounding the fundamental nature of their reasoning capabilities.<n>While achieving high performance on benchmarks such as GPQA and MMLU, these models exhibit limitations in more complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose a novel phenomenological approach that goes beyond traditional accuracy metrics to probe the underlying mechanisms of model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T16:58:18Z)
• SPHERE: Unveiling Spatial Blind Spots in Vision-Language Models Through Hierarchical Evaluation [7.659514491338669]
  Current vision-language models may grasp basic spatial cues but struggle with the multi-dimensional spatial reasoning necessary for human-like understanding and real-world applications.<n>We develop SPHERE, a hierarchical evaluation framework supported by a new human-annotated dataset.<n> Benchmark evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals significant deficiencies, especially in reasoning about distance and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T09:10:55Z)
• On the Element-Wise Representation and Reasoning in Zero-Shot Image Recognition: A Systematic Survey [82.49623756124357]
  Zero-shot image recognition (ZSIR) aims to recognize and reason in unseen domains by learning generalized knowledge from limited data.<n>This paper thoroughly investigates recent advances in element-wise ZSIR and provides a basis for its future development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T05:49:21Z)
• Reframing Spatial Reasoning Evaluation in Language Models: A Real-World Simulation Benchmark for Qualitative Reasoning [4.422649561583363]
  We present a novel benchmark for assessing spatial reasoning in language models (LMs) It is grounded in realistic 3D simulation data, offering a series of diverse room layouts with various objects and their spatial relationships. A key contribution is our logic-based consistency-checking tool, which enables the assessment of multiple plausible solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T21:22:00Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation Models [235.7288855108172]
  Reasoning plays a pivotal role in various real-world settings such as negotiation, medical diagnosis, and criminal investigation. We introduce seminal foundation models proposed or adaptable for reasoning. We then delve into the potential future directions behind the emergence of reasoning abilities within foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T15:16:13Z)
• In-Context Analogical Reasoning with Pre-Trained Language Models [10.344428417489237]
  We explore the use of intuitive language-based abstractions to support analogy in AI systems. Specifically, we apply large pre-trained language models (PLMs) to visual Raven's Progressive Matrices ( RPM) We find that PLMs exhibit a striking capacity for zero-shot relational reasoning, exceeding human performance and nearing supervised vision-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T04:22:26Z)
• Causal Reasoning Meets Visual Representation Learning: A Prospective Study [117.08431221482638]
  Lack of interpretability, robustness, and out-of-distribution generalization are becoming the challenges of the existing visual models. Inspired by the strong inference ability of human-level agents, recent years have witnessed great effort in developing causal reasoning paradigms. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of this emerging field, attract attention, encourage discussions, bring to the forefront the urgency of developing novel causal reasoning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T02:22:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.