Agent-Environment Alignment via Automated Interface Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21055v1
• Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 11:44:50 GMT
• Title: Agent-Environment Alignment via Automated Interface Generation
• Abstract summary: Large language model (LLM) agents have shown impressive reasoning capabilities in interactive decision-making tasks.<n> mismatches often happen between the internal expectations of the agent regarding the influence of its issued actions and the actual state transitions in the environment.<n>We propose textbfALIGN, an interface that enhances both the static information of the environment and the step-wise observations returned to the agent.
• Score: 10.469261669159367
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents have shown impressive reasoning capabilities in interactive decision-making tasks. These agents interact with environment through intermediate interfaces, such as predefined action spaces and interaction rules, which mediate the perception and action. However, mismatches often happen between the internal expectations of the agent regarding the influence of its issued actions and the actual state transitions in the environment, a phenomenon referred to as \textbf{agent-environment misalignment}. While prior work has invested substantially in improving agent strategies and environment design, the critical role of the interface still remains underexplored. In this work, we empirically demonstrate that agent-environment misalignment poses a significant bottleneck to agent performance. To mitigate this issue, we propose \textbf{ALIGN}, an \underline{A}uto-A\underline{l}igned \underline{I}nterface \underline{G}e\underline{n}eration framework that alleviates the misalignment by enriching the interface. Specifically, the ALIGN-generated interface enhances both the static information of the environment and the step-wise observations returned to the agent. Implemented as a lightweight wrapper, this interface achieves the alignment without modifying either the agent logic or the environment code. Experiments across multiple domains including embodied tasks, web navigation and tool-use, show consistent performance improvements, with up to a 45.67\% success rate improvement observed in ALFWorld. Meanwhile, ALIGN-generated interface can generalize across different agent architectures and LLM backbones without interface regeneration. Code and experimental results are available at https://github.com/THUNLP-MT/ALIGN.

Related papers

• ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step [74.83535434786145]
  We introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning.<n>The benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T15:07:46Z)
• From Profiling to Synthesis: Benchmarking Implicit Behavioral Alignment in Personalized LLM Agents [56.187590188698955]
  Large Language Models have enabled increasingly capable autonomous agents, yet personalization remains critical for making such agents practically useful.<n>Recent benchmarks have begun evaluating personalization in agents, but they largely rely on static preference snapshots, fixed interaction logs, or question answering over predefined user profiles.<n>We introduce IBA-Bench, a benchmark for implicit behavioral alignment constructed from longitudinal interaction histories.<n>We propose IBA-Agent, an agent framework that reconciles conflicting priorities through broad retrieval and trajectory-level alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T12:52:04Z)
• Can Agents Generalize to the Open World? Unveiling the Fragility of Static Training in Tool Use [14.813603277906623]
  We formalize OpenAgent, a problem setting characterized by distributional shifts across query, action, observation, and domain dimensions.<n>Our analysis yields a series of key insights, demonstrating that agents trained via both Supervised Fine-Tuning(SFT) and Reinforcement Learning suffer from varying degrees of performance degradation.<n>We propose Perturbation-Augmented Fine-Tuning, a disturbance-based intervention strategy for SFT that lays the foundation for enhancing agent robustness and utility in realistic environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T15:40:25Z)
• Adaptive Multimodal Agents-Based Framework for Automatic Workflow Execution [1.2132786136735432]
  We propose a novel multi-agent framework that achieves automatic workflow execution through a distinct two-phase pipeline.<n>During inference, agents leverage Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) over this fixed, pre-established graph.<n>We validate our framework in a real-world context, demonstrating its ability to maintain high reliability and semantic awareness even with limited training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T15:23:22Z)
• AgentSkiller: Scaling Generalist Agent Intelligence through Semantically Integrated Cross-Domain Data Synthesis [30.512393568258105]
  Large Language Model agents demonstrate potential in solving real-world problems via tools, yet generalist intelligence is bottlenecked by scarce high-quality, long-horizon data.<n>We propose AgentSkiller, a fully automated framework synthesizing multi-turn interaction data across realistic, semantically linked domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T03:21:42Z)
• DLLM Agent: See Farther, Run Faster [94.74432470237817]
  Diffusion large language models (DLLMs) have emerged as an alternative to autoregressive (AR) decoding with appealing efficiency and modeling properties.<n>We study this in a controlled setting by instantiatingDLLM and AR backbones within the same agent workflow.<n>We find thatDLLM Agents are on average over 30% faster end to end than AR agents, with some cases exceeding 8x speedup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T09:01:18Z)
• What Do Agents Learn from Trajectory-SFT: Semantics or Interfaces? [32.72487312750579]
  We propose PIPE, a protocol-level evaluation augmentation for diagnosing interface reliance by minimally rewriting environment interfaces.<n>Across 16 environments from AgentBench and AgentGym and a range of open-source and API-based agents, PIPE reveals that trajectory-SFT substantially amplifies interface shortcutting.<n>We further introduce Interface Reliance (IR), a counterbalanced alias-based metric that quantifies preference for training-time interfaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T04:02:03Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• InterAgent: Physics-based Multi-agent Command Execution via Diffusion on Interaction Graphs [72.5651722107621]
  InterAgent is an end-to-end framework for text-driven physics-based multi-agent humanoid control.<n>We introduce an autoregressive diffusion transformer equipped with multi-stream blocks, which decouples proprioception, exteroception, and action to cross-modal interference.<n>We also propose a novel interaction graph exteroception representation that explicitly captures fine-grained joint-to-joint spatial dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T10:46:01Z)
• CuES: A Curiosity-driven and Environment-grounded Synthesis Framework for Agentic RL [35.086788669916594]
  Large language model based agents are increasingly deployed in complex, tool augmented environments.<n>Existing approaches typically assume predefined task collections, an assumption that fails in novel environments.<n>We propose CuES, a Curiosity driven and Environment grounded Synthesis framework that autonomously generates diverse, executable, and meaningful tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T06:11:37Z)
• Sample-Efficient Online Learning in LM Agents via Hindsight Trajectory Rewriting [92.57796055887995]
  We introduce ECHO, a prompting framework that adapts hindsight experience replay from reinforcement learning for language model agents.<n> ECHO generates optimized trajectories for alternative goals that could have been achieved during failed attempts.<n>We evaluate ECHO on stateful versions of XMiniGrid, a text-based navigation and planning benchmark, and PeopleJoinQA, a collaborative information-gathering enterprise simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T18:11:09Z)
• GUI-PRA: Process Reward Agent for GUI Tasks [25.20594694997543]
  Process Reward Models (PRMs) are a promising solution, as they can guide these agents with crucial process signals during inference.<n>PRMs suffer from a "lost in the middle" phenomenon, where the overwhelming historical context compromises the evaluation of the current step.<n>We introduce GUI-PRA (Process Reward Agent for GUI Tasks), a judge agent designed to better provide process reward than standard PRM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T11:42:36Z)
• ToolACE-MT: Non-Autoregressive Generation for Agentic Multi-Turn Interaction [84.90394416593624]
  Agentic task-solving with Large Language Models (LLMs) requires multi-turn, multi-step interactions.<n>Existing simulation-based data generation methods rely heavily on costly autoregressive interactions between multiple agents.<n>We propose a novel Non-Autoregressive Iterative Generation framework, called ToolACE-MT, for constructing high-quality multi-turn agentic dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T07:38:23Z)
• AgentSight: System-Level Observability for AI Agents Using eBPF [10.37440633887049]
  Existing tools observe either an agent's high-level intent (via LLM prompts) or its low-level actions (e.g., system calls) but cannot correlate these two views.<n>We introduce AgentSight, an AgentOps observability framework that bridges this semantic gap using a hybrid approach.<n>AgentSight intercepts TLS-encrypted LLM traffic to extract semantic intent, monitors kernel events to observe system-wide effects, and causally correlates these two streams across process boundaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T01:43:39Z)
• Less is More: Empowering GUI Agent with Context-Aware Simplification [62.02157661751793]
  We propose a context-aware framework for building an efficient and effective GUI Agent, termed SimpAgent.<n>With the above components, SimpAgent reduces 27% FLOPs and achieves superior GUI navigation performances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T17:37:15Z)
• Agent models: Internalizing Chain-of-Action Generation into Reasoning models [15.954047804223379]
  We position emphLarge Agent Models (LAMs) that internalize the generation of emphChain-of-Action (CoA)<n>Our proposed AutoCoA framework combines supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL)<n>Main components include step-level action triggering, trajectory-level CoA, and an internal world model to reduce real-environment interaction costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T12:19:47Z)
• MOSS: Enabling Code-Driven Evolution and Context Management for AI Agents [7.4159044558995335]
  We introduce MOSS (llM-oriented Operating System Simulation), a novel framework that integrates code generation with a dynamic context management system. At its core, the framework employs an Inversion of Control container in conjunction with decorators to enforce the least knowledge principle. We show how this framework can enhance the efficiency and capabilities of agent development and highlight its advantages in moving towards Turing-complete agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T14:30:21Z)
• Caution for the Environment: Multimodal Agents are Susceptible to Environmental Distractions [68.92637077909693]
  This paper investigates the faithfulness of multimodal large language model (MLLM) agents in the graphical user interface (GUI) environment. A general setting is proposed where both the user and the agent are benign, and the environment, while not malicious, contains unrelated content. Experimental results reveal that even the most powerful models, whether generalist agents or specialist GUI agents, are susceptible to distractions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T15:16:22Z)
• Improving Zero-Shot ObjectNav with Generative Communication [60.84730028539513]
  We propose a new method for improving zero-shot ObjectNav. Our approach takes into account that the ground agent may have limited and sometimes obstructed view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-03T22:55:26Z)
• Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
  Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents. We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations. IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z)
• CoCo-Agent: A Comprehensive Cognitive MLLM Agent for Smartphone GUI Automation [61.68049335444254]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown remarkable potential as human-like autonomous language agents to interact with real-world environments. We propose a Comprehensive Cognitive LLM Agent, CoCo-Agent, with two novel approaches, comprehensive environment perception (CEP) and conditional action prediction (CAP) With our technical design, our agent achieves new state-of-the-art performance on AITW and META-GUI benchmarks, showing promising abilities in realistic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T08:29:03Z)
• Affordable Generative Agents [16.372072265248192]
  Affordable Generative Agents (AGA) is a framework for enabling the generation of believable and low-cost interactions on both agent-environment and inter-agents levels. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/AffordableGenerativeAgents/Affordable-Generative-Agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T06:16:28Z)
• Real-Time Motion Prediction via Heterogeneous Polyline Transformer with Relative Pose Encoding [121.08841110022607]
  Existing agent-centric methods have demonstrated outstanding performance on public benchmarks. We introduce the K-nearest neighbor attention with relative pose encoding (KNARPE), a novel attention mechanism allowing the pairwise-relative representation to be used by Transformers. By sharing contexts among agents and reusing the unchanged contexts, our approach is as efficient as scene-centric methods, while performing on par with state-of-the-art agent-centric methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T17:59:01Z)
• LACMA: Language-Aligning Contrastive Learning with Meta-Actions for Embodied Instruction Following [142.25438780561603]
  We introduce a novel concept of meta-actions to bridge the semantic gap between language instructions and agent's action space. Compared to a strong multi-modal Transformer baseline, we achieve a significant 4.5% absolute gain in success rate in unseen environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T21:43:07Z)
• Offline Imitation Learning with Variational Counterfactual Reasoning [17.344961438658427]
  In offline imitation learning (IL), an agent aims to learn an optimal expert behavior policy without additional online environment interactions. We propose a framework named underlineOffline underlineImitation underlineLearning with underlineCounterfactual data underlineAugmentation (OILCA) by doing counterfactual inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T06:52:18Z)
• Diagnosing the Environment Bias in Vision-and-Language Navigation [102.02103792590076]
  Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an agent to follow natural-language instructions, explore the given environments, and reach the desired target locations. Recent works that study VLN observe a significant performance drop when tested on unseen environments, indicating that the neural agent models are highly biased towards training environments. In this work, we design novel diagnosis experiments via environment re-splitting and feature replacement, looking into possible reasons for this environment bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T19:24:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.