Echoes of BERT: Do Modern Language Models Rediscover the Classical NLP Pipeline?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02132v4
• Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 23:03:01 GMT
• Title: Echoes of BERT: Do Modern Language Models Rediscover the Classical NLP Pipeline?
• Authors: Michael Li, Nishant Subramani,
• Abstract summary: Building on classic BERTology work, we analyze 25 models spanning from classical architectures (BERT, DeBERTa, GPT-2) to modern large language models (Pythia, OLMo-2, Gemma-2, Qwen2.5, Llama-3.1)<n>We find that hierarchical organization persists in modern models, with early layers capture syntax, middle layers handle semantics and entity-level information, and later layers encode discourse phenomena.<n>We find that lexical information concentrates linearly in early layers but becomes increasingly nonlinear deeper in the network, while inflectional information remains linearly accessible throughout all layers.
• Score: 4.991808275998526
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large transformer-based language models dominate modern NLP, yet our understanding of how they encode linguistic information relies primarily on studies of early models like BERT and GPT-2. Building on classic BERTology work, we analyze 25 models spanning from classical architectures (BERT, DeBERTa, GPT-2) to modern large language models (Pythia, OLMo-2, Gemma-2, Qwen2.5, Llama-3.1), probing layer-by-layer representations across eight linguistic tasks in English. Consistent with earlier findings, we find that hierarchical organization persists in modern models: early layers capture syntax, middle layers handle semantics and entity-level information, and later layers encode discourse phenomena. We dive deeper, conducting an in-depth multilingual analysis of two specific linguistic properties - lexical identity and inflectional morphology - that help disentangle form from meaning. We find that lexical information concentrates linearly in early layers but becomes increasingly nonlinear deeper in the network, while inflectional information remains linearly accessible throughout all layers. Additional analyses of attention mechanisms, steering vectors, and pretraining checkpoints reveal where this information resides within layers, how it can be functionally manipulated, and how representations evolve during pretraining. Taken together, our findings suggest that, even with substantial advances in LLM technologies, transformer models learn to organize linguistic information in similar ways, regardless of model architecture, size, or training regime, indicating that these properties are important for next token prediction. Our code is available at https://github.com/ml5885/model_internal_sleuthing

Related papers

• Tracing Multilingual Representations in LLMs with Cross-Layer Transcoders [51.380449540006985]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can process many languages, yet how they internally represent this diversity remains unclear.<n>Do they form shared multilingual representations with language-specific decoding, and if so, why does performance still favor the dominant training language?<n>We analyze their internal mechanisms using cross-layer transcoders (CLT) and attribution graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T22:51:06Z)
• The more polypersonal the better -- a short look on space geometry of fine-tuned layers [0.0]
  We analyze the changes in the internal representation of the BERT model when it is trained with additional grammatical modules.<n>We find that adding a single grammatical layer causes the model to separate the new and old grammatical systems within itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T18:50:47Z)
• Large Concept Models: Language Modeling in a Sentence Representation Space [62.73366944266477]
  We present an attempt at an architecture which operates on an explicit higher-level semantic representation, which we name a concept.<n> Concepts are language- and modality-agnostic and represent a higher level idea or action in a flow.<n>We show that our model exhibits impressive zero-shot generalization performance to many languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T23:36:20Z)
• Gradient Localization Improves Lifelong Pretraining of Language Models [32.29298047707914]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on web-scale text corpora have been shown to capture world knowledge in their parameters. In this work, we examine two types of knowledge relating to temporally sensitive entities and demonstrate that each type is localized to different sets of parameters within the LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T05:43:50Z)
• Scaling Laws for Linear Complexity Language Models [18.787664489713332]
  We present the scaling laws for linear complexity language models to establish a foundation for their scalability. The study reveals that existing linear complexity language models exhibit similar scaling capabilities as conventional transformer-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T14:51:31Z)
• Talking Heads: Understanding Inter-layer Communication in Transformer Language Models [32.2976613483151]
  We analyze a mechanism used in two LMs to selectively inhibit items in a context in one task.<n>We find that models write into low-rank subspaces of the residual stream to represent features which are then read out by later layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T18:12:01Z)
• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Models [59.627729608055006]
  We introduce Holmes, a new benchmark designed to assess language models (LMs) linguistic competence. We use computation-based probing to examine LMs' internal representations regarding distinct linguistic phenomena. As a result, we meet recent calls to disentangle LMs' linguistic competence from other cognitive abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T17:58:36Z)
• Decoding Probing: Revealing Internal Linguistic Structures in Neural Language Models using Minimal Pairs [0.873811641236639]
  We introduce a novel decoding probing' method to probe internal linguistic characteristics in neural language models layer by layer. By treating the language model as the brain' and its representations as neural activations', we decode grammaticality labels of minimal pairs from the intermediate layers' representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T00:56:06Z)
• On the Origins of Linear Representations in Large Language Models [51.88404605700344]
  We introduce a simple latent variable model to formalize the concept dynamics of the next token prediction. Experiments show that linear representations emerge when learning from data matching the latent variable model. We additionally confirm some predictions of the theory using the LLaMA-2 large language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T17:17:36Z)
• Fantastic Semantics and Where to Find Them: Investigating Which Layers of Generative LLMs Reflect Lexical Semantics [50.982315553104975]
  We investigate the bottom-up evolution of lexical semantics for a popular large language model, namely Llama2. Our experiments show that the representations in lower layers encode lexical semantics, while the higher layers, with weaker semantic induction, are responsible for prediction. This is in contrast to models with discriminative objectives, such as mask language modeling, where the higher layers obtain better lexical semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T13:14:47Z)
• In-Context Language Learning: Architectures and Algorithms [73.93205821154605]
  We study ICL through the lens of a new family of model problems we term in context language learning (ICLL) We evaluate a diverse set of neural sequence models on regular ICLL tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T18:59:21Z)
• Unveiling Multilinguality in Transformer Models: Exploring Language Specificity in Feed-Forward Networks [12.7259425362286]
  We investigate how multilingual models might leverage key-value memories. For autoregressive models trained on two or more languages, do all neurons (across layers) respond equally to all languages? Our findings reveal that the layers closest to the network's input or output tend to exhibit more language-specific behaviour compared to the layers in the middle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T06:45:00Z)
• Language Model Pre-Training with Sparse Latent Typing [66.75786739499604]
  We propose a new pre-training objective, Sparse Latent Typing, which enables the model to sparsely extract sentence-level keywords with diverse latent types. Experimental results show that our model is able to learn interpretable latent type categories in a self-supervised manner without using any external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T00:37:08Z)
• Is neural language acquisition similar to natural? A chronological probing study [0.0515648410037406]
  We present the chronological probing study of transformer English models such as MultiBERT and T5. We compare the information about the language learned by the models in the process of training on corpora. The results show that 1) linguistic information is acquired in the early stages of training 2) both language models demonstrate capabilities to capture various features from various levels of language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T17:24:11Z)
• A Unified Understanding of Deep NLP Models for Text Classification [88.35418976241057]
  We have developed a visual analysis tool, DeepNLPVis, to enable a unified understanding of NLP models for text classification. The key idea is a mutual information-based measure, which provides quantitative explanations on how each layer of a model maintains the information of input words in a sample. A multi-level visualization, which consists of a corpus-level, a sample-level, and a word-level visualization, supports the analysis from the overall training set to individual samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-19T08:55:07Z)
• Better Language Model with Hypernym Class Prediction [101.8517004687825]
  Class-based language models (LMs) have been long devised to address context sparsity in $n$-gram LMs. In this study, we revisit this approach in the context of neural LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-21T01:16:44Z)
• How transfer learning impacts linguistic knowledge in deep NLP models? [22.035813865470956]
  Deep NLP models learn non-trivial amount of linguistic knowledge, captured at different layers of the model. We investigate how fine-tuning towards downstream NLP tasks impacts the learned linguistic knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T17:43:57Z)
• Lattice-BERT: Leveraging Multi-Granularity Representations in Chinese Pre-trained Language Models [62.41139712595334]
  We propose a novel pre-training paradigm for Chinese -- Lattice-BERT. We construct a lattice graph from the characters and words in a sentence and feed all these text units into transformers. We show that our model can bring an average increase of 1.5% under the 12-layer setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T02:36:49Z)
• Multi-timescale Representation Learning in LSTM Language Models [69.98840820213937]
  Language models must capture statistical dependencies between words at timescales ranging from very short to very long. We derived a theory for how the memory gating mechanism in long short-term memory language models can capture power law decay. Experiments showed that LSTM language models trained on natural English text learn to approximate this theoretical distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-27T02:13:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.