On whether quantum theory needs complex numbers: the foil theories perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08091v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 18:00:02 GMT
• Title: On whether quantum theory needs complex numbers: the foil theories perspective
• Authors: Yìlè Yīng, Maria Ciudad Alañón, Daniel Centeno, Jacopo Surace, Marina Maciel Ansanelli, Ruizhi Liu, David Schmid, Robert W. Spekkens,
• Abstract summary: We show that there is no possibility of distinguishing any twirled quantum world from quantum theory given only an assumption about causal structure.<n>We also identify certain necessary conditions on a causal structure for it to be able to support a causal compatibility gap between the theory and its symmetrized version.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent work by Renou et al. (2021) has led to some controversy concerning the question of whether quantum theory requires complex numbers for its formulation. We promote the view that the main result of that work is best understood not as a claim about the relative merits of different representations of quantum theory, but rather as a claim about the possibility of experimentally adjudicating between standard quantum theory and an alternative theory -- a foil theory -- known as real-amplitude quantum theory (RQT). In particular, the claim is that this adjudication can be achieved given only an assumption about the causal structure of the experiment. Here, we aim to shed some light on why this is possible, by reconceptualizing the comparison of the two theories as an instance of a broader class of such theory comparisons. By recasting RQT as the subtheory of quantum theory that arises by symmetrizing with respect to the collective action of a time-reversal symmetry, we can compare it to other subtheories that arise by symmetrization, but for different symmetries. If the symmetry has a unitary representation, the resulting foil theory is termed a twirled quantum world, and if it does not (as is the case in RQT), the resulting foil theory is termed a swirled quantum world. We show that, in contrast to RQT, there is no possibility of distinguishing any twirled quantum world from quantum theory given only an assumption about causal structure. We also define analogues of twirling and swirling for an arbitrary generalized probabilistic theory and identify certain necessary conditions on a causal structure for it to be able to support a causal compatibility gap between the theory and its symmetrized version. We draw out the implications of these analyses for the question of how a lack of a shared reference frame state features into the possibility of such a gap.

Related papers

• The composition rule for quantum systems is not the only possible one [0.0]
  We argue that the composition postulate deserves to be experimentally scrutinised independently of the other features of quantum theory.<n>We formulate a family of operational theories that are solely distinguished from standard quantum theory by their system-composition rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T19:31:13Z)
• A no-go theorem for sequential and retro-causal hidden-variable theories based on computational complexity [0.0]
  Bell's no-go theorem requires a theory to model quantum correlation-at-a-distance phenomena. If a theory is compatible with quantum mechanics, then the problems of solving its mathematical models must be as hard as calculating the output of quantum circuits. I show that these classes fail to cover the computational complexity of sampling from quantum circuits. The result represents a no-go theorem that rules out a large family of sequential and post-selection-based theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T08:19:58Z)
• Minimal operational theories: classical theories with quantum features [41.94295877935867]
  We introduce a class of probabilistic theories, where system dynamics are constrained to the minimal set of operations.<n>Specifically, the allowed instruments are limited to those derived from compositions of preparations, measurements, swap transformations, and conditional tests.<n>We demonstrate that minimal theories with conditioning and a spanning set of non-separable states satisfy two quantum no-go theorems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T16:24:09Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [45.76759085727843]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics.<n>It allows to model situations where the order of observations does not matter.<n>It is well known that both theorems do not hold for finitely exchangeable sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• Quantum Theory Needs (And Probably Has) Real Reduction [0.0]
  It appears that for quantum theory to be viable in a realist sense, it must possess genuine, physical non-unitarity. Penrose's theory of gravitation-induced collapse and the Transactional Interpretation are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T21:25:23Z)
• Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information theories [68.8204255655161]
  We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory. We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z)
• Testing real quantum theory in an optical quantum network [1.6720048283946962]
  We show that tests in the spirit of a Bell inequality can reveal quantum predictions in entanglement swapping scenarios. We disproving real quantum theory as a universal physical theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T05:09:36Z)
• $\PT$ Symmetry and Renormalisation in Quantum Field Theory [62.997667081978825]
  Quantum systems governed by non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with $PT$ symmetry are special in having real energy eigenvalues bounded below and unitary time evolution. We show how $PT$ symmetry may allow interpretations that evade ghosts and instabilities present in an interpretation of the theory within a Hermitian framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-27T09:46:36Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Quantum simulation of gauge theory via orbifold lattice [47.28069960496992]
  We propose a new framework for simulating $textU(k)$ Yang-Mills theory on a universal quantum computer. We discuss the application of our constructions to computing static properties and real-time dynamics of Yang-Mills theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T18:49:11Z)
• Towards correlation self-testing of quantum theory in the adaptive Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt game [1.0878040851638]
  Correlation self-testing of a theory addresses the question of whether we can identify the set of correlations realisable in a theory from its performance in a particular information processing task. This is the first step towards a general solution that could rule out all theories in which the set of realisable correlations does not coincide with the quantum set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T18:04:13Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.