VL-GenRM: Enhancing Vision-Language Verification via Vision Experts and Iterative Training

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13888v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 18:10:51 GMT
• Title: VL-GenRM: Enhancing Vision-Language Verification via Vision Experts and Iterative Training
• Abstract summary: Vision-Language Reward Model (VL-RM) is key to aligning VL models by providing structured feedback.<n> bootstrapping dilemma arises as high-quality training data depends on already strong VL models.<n>We propose an iterative training framework leveraging vision experts, Chain-of-Thought rationales, and Margin-based Rejection Sampling.
• Score: 23.391643634478587
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) with verifiable rewards has advanced large language models but remains underexplored for Vision-Language (VL) models. The Vision-Language Reward Model (VL-RM) is key to aligning VL models by providing structured feedback, yet training effective VL-RMs faces two major challenges. First, the bootstrapping dilemma arises as high-quality training data depends on already strong VL models, creating a cycle where self-generated supervision reinforces existing biases. Second, modality bias and negative example amplification occur when VL models hallucinate incorrect visual attributes, leading to flawed preference data that further misguides training. To address these issues, we propose an iterative training framework leveraging vision experts, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) rationales, and Margin-based Rejection Sampling. Our approach refines preference datasets, enhances structured critiques, and iteratively improves reasoning. Experiments across VL-RM benchmarks demonstrate superior performance in hallucination detection and multimodal reasoning, advancing VL model alignment with reinforcement learning.

Related papers

• On Predicting the Post-training Potential of Pre-trained LLMs [60.07459271263409]
  We introduce a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training.<n>We propose RuDE, a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination.<n>Experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T11:33:49Z)
• Learn to Think: Improving Multimodal Reasoning through Vision-Aware Self-Improvement Training [82.17582358979884]
  Post-training with explicit reasoning traces is common to improve the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We propose VISTA, a vision-aware self-improvement training framework for enhancing the multimodal reasoning of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T10:44:35Z)
• SpanVLA: Efficient Action Bridging and Learning from Negative-Recovery Samples for Vision-Language-Action Model [16.077387927185917]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models offer a promising autonomous driving paradigm for leveraging world knowledge and reasoning capabilities.<n>Existing VLA models often struggle with the high latency in action generation using an autoregressive generation framework.<n>We propose SpanVLA, a novel end-to-end autonomous driving framework, integrating an autoregressive reasoning and a flow-matching action expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T17:34:19Z)
• SVSR: A Self-Verification and Self-Rectification Paradigm for Multimodal Reasoning [12.51459553492698]
  Self-Verification and Self-Rectification (SVSR) is a unified framework that integrates self-verification and self-rectification into the model's reasoning pipeline.<n>SVSR substantially improves robustness and reliability in complex visual understanding and multimodal reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-11T14:25:17Z)
• VISTA: Enhancing Visual Conditioning via Track-Following Preference Optimization in Vision-Language-Action Models [26.542479606920423]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of robotic manipulation tasks.<n>Despite the success, extending large pretrained VLA models to the action space can induce vision-action misalignment.<n>We propose a training framework that explicitly strengthens visual conditioning in VLA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T20:59:29Z)
• Understanding Degradation with Vision Language Model [56.09241449206817]
  Understanding visual degradations is a critical yet challenging problem in computer vision.<n>We introduce DU-VLM, a multimodal chain-of-thought model trained with supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.<n>We also introduce textbfDU-110k, a large-scale dataset comprising 110,000 clean-degraded pairs with grounded physical annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T13:51:15Z)
• More Than the Final Answer: Improving Visual Extraction and Logical Consistency in Vision-Language Models [74.10138874771852]
  We propose PeRL-VL (Perception and Reasoning Learning for Vision-Language Models), a decoupled framework that separately improves visual perception and textual reasoning on top of RLVR.<n>For perception, PeRL-VL introduces a VLM-based description reward that scores the model's self-generated image descriptions for faithfulness and sufficiency.<n>For reasoning, PeRL-VL adds a text-only Reasoning SFT stage on logic-rich chain-of-thought data, enhancing coherence and logical consistency independently of vision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T23:06:18Z)
• Counteracting Matthew Effect in Self-Improvement of LVLMs through Head-Tail Re-balancing [70.35701681177655]
  Self-improvement has emerged as a mainstream paradigm for advancing the reasoning capabilities of large vision-language models.<n>We introduce four efficient strategies to achieve head-tail re-balancing during the exploration-and-learning self-improvement process.<n>Our methods consistently improve visual reasoning capabilities, outperforming vanilla self-improvement by 3.86 points on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T13:26:58Z)
• Perception Before Reasoning: Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning for Visual Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [33.78309915588303]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven highly effective in eliciting the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose a two-stage reinforcement learning framework designed to jointly enhance both the perceptual and reasoning capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs)<n>After the proposed two-stage reinforcement learning process, we obtain PeBR-R1, a vision-language model with significantly enhanced perceptual and reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T12:51:11Z)
• EdgeVLA: Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models [0.4005096060512278]
  This paper introduces Edge VLA, a novel approach designed to significantly enhance the inference speed of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models.<n>We achieve this through two key innovations: 1) Eliminating the autoregressive requirement for end-effector position prediction, leading to a 7x speedup in inference, and 2) Leveraging the efficiency of Small Language Models (SLMs)<n>Our early results demonstrate that EVLA achieves comparable training characteristics to OpenVLA while offering substantial gains in inference speed and memory efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T16:15:09Z)
• Vision-R1: Evolving Human-Free Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models via Vision-Guided Reinforcement Learning [26.14137626882127]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) typically follow a two-stage training paradigm-pretraining and supervised fine-tuning.<n> preference optimization, derived from the language domain, has emerged as an effective post-training reinforcement strategy.<n>We propose Vision-R1, a novel vision-guided R1-like reinforcement learning algorithm for LVLMs that rewards models with definitive vision feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T10:21:14Z)
• OpenVLThinker: An Early Exploration to Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative Self-Improvement [91.88062410741833]
  This study investigates whether similar reasoning capabilities can be successfully integrated into large vision-language models (LVLMs)<n>We consider an approach that iteratively leverages supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on lightweight training data and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to further improve model generalization.<n>OpenVLThinker, a LVLM exhibiting consistently improved reasoning performance on challenging benchmarks such as MathVista, MathVerse, and MathVision, demonstrates the potential of our strategy for robust vision-language reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z)
• From Captions to Rewards (CAREVL): Leveraging Large Language Model Experts for Enhanced Reward Modeling in Large Vision-Language Models [58.16075709485292]
  CAREVL is a novel method for preference reward modeling by reliably using both high- and low-confidence data.<n> CAREVL achieves performance improvements over traditional distillation-based methods on VL-RewardBench and MLLM-as-a-Judge benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T16:13:18Z)
• UP-VLA: A Unified Understanding and Prediction Model for Embodied Agent [14.089700378708756]
  We introduce textbfUP-VLA, a textbfUnified VLA model training with both multi-modal textbfUnderstanding and future textbfPrediction objectives.<n>UP-VLA achieves a 33% improvement on the Calvin ABC-D benchmark compared to the previous state-of-the-art method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T03:20:09Z)
• VL-RewardBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Generative Reward Models [66.56298924208319]
  Vision-language generative reward models (VL-GenRMs) play a crucial role in aligning and evaluating multimodal AI systems.<n>Current assessment methods primarily rely on AI-annotated preference labels from traditional tasks.<n>We introduce VL-RewardBench, a comprehensive benchmark spanning general multimodal queries, visual hallucination detection, and complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T14:08:34Z)
• Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoning [86.83335752119741]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in vision language models (VLMs) is crucial for improving interpretability and trustworthiness. We show that training VLM on short answers does not generalize well to reasoning tasks that require more detailed responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:00:06Z)
• Fine-Grained Verifiers: Preference Modeling as Next-token Prediction in Vision-Language Alignment [57.0121616203175]
  We propose FiSAO, a novel self-alignment method that utilizes the model's own visual encoder as a fine-grained verifier to improve vision-language alignment.<n>By leveraging token-level feedback from the vision encoder, FiSAO significantly improves vision-language alignment, even surpassing traditional preference tuning methods that require additional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T03:34:32Z)
• VLFeedback: A Large-Scale AI Feedback Dataset for Large Vision-Language Models Alignment [55.7956150385255]
  We investigate the efficacy of AI feedback to scale supervision for aligning vision-language models. We introduce VLFeedback, the first large-scale vision-language feedback dataset. We train Silkie, an LVLM fine-tuned via direct preference optimization on VLFeedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:56:47Z)
• Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [61.28463542324576]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have recently demonstrated strong efficacy as visual assistants that can generate human-like outputs. We evaluate existing state-of-the-art VLMs and find that even the best-performing model is unable to demonstrate strong visual reasoning capabilities and consistency. We propose a two-stage training framework aimed at improving both the reasoning performance and consistency of VLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T17:49:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.