Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspective on Reinforcement Learning for LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14758v2
• Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 12:47:07 GMT
• Title: Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspective on Reinforcement Learning for LLMs
• Authors: Daixuan Cheng, Shaohan Huang, Xuekai Zhu, Bo Dai, Wayne Xin Zhao, Zhenliang Zhang, Furu Wei,
• Abstract summary: Balancing exploration and exploitation is a central goal in reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We introduce a minimal modification to standard RL with only one line of code: augmenting the advantage function with an entropy-based term.<n>Our method achieves significant gains on the Pass@K metric, even when evaluated with extremely large K values.
• Score: 112.40801692473723
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Balancing exploration and exploitation is a central goal in reinforcement learning (RL). Despite recent advances in enhancing large language model (LLM) reasoning, most methods lean toward exploitation, and increasingly encounter performance plateaus. In this work, we revisit entropy -- a signal of exploration in RL -- and examine its relationship to exploratory reasoning in LLMs. Through empirical analysis, we uncover positive correlations between high-entropy regions and three types of exploratory reasoning actions: (1) pivotal tokens that determine or connect logical steps, (2) reflective actions such as self-verification and correction, and (3) rare behaviors under-explored by the base LLMs. Motivated by this, we introduce a minimal modification to standard RL with only one line of code: augmenting the advantage function with an entropy-based term. Unlike traditional maximum-entropy methods which encourage exploration by promoting uncertainty, we encourage exploration by promoting longer and deeper reasoning chains. Notably, our method achieves significant gains on the Pass@K metric -- an upper-bound estimator of LLM reasoning capabilities -- even when evaluated with extremely large K values, pushing the boundaries of LLM reasoning.

Related papers

• RL-PLUS: Countering Capability Boundary Collapse of LLMs in Reinforcement Learning with Hybrid-policy Optimization [86.30192066451256]
  We propose RL-PLUS, a novel hybrid-policy optimization approach for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n> RL-PLUS synergizes internal exploitation with external data to achieve stronger reasoning capabilities and surpass the boundaries of base models.<n>We provide both theoretical analysis and extensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority and generalizability of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T23:55:29Z)
• Revisiting LLM Reasoning via Information Bottleneck [57.519119962528166]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning capabilities through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR)<n>We present a theoretical characterization of LLM reasoning grounded in information bottleneck (IB) principle.<n>We propose IB-aware reasoning optimization (IBRO), a framework that encourages reasoning trajectories to be both informative about the final correct answer and generalizable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T13:14:25Z)
• Beyond Markovian: Reflective Exploration via Bayes-Adaptive RL for LLM Reasoning [55.36978389831446]
  We recast reflective exploration within the Bayes-Adaptive RL framework.<n>Our resulting algorithm, BARL, instructs the LLM to stitch and switch strategies based on observed outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T22:51:00Z)
• Hybrid Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [51.06635386903026]
  We explore latent reasoning by leveraging the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) via reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We introduce hybrid reasoning policy optimization (HRPO), an RL-based hybrid latent reasoning approach that integrates prior hidden states into sampled tokens with a learnable gating mechanism.<n>HRPO-trained LLMs remain interpretable and exhibit intriguing behaviors like cross-lingual patterns and shorter completion lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T01:26:16Z)
• Navigate the Unknown: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Intrinsic Motivation Guided Exploration [33.807927649100805]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a pivotal method for improving the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>RL approaches face critical limitations due to their reliance on sparse outcome-based rewards and inadequate mechanisms for incentivizing exploration.<n>We propose an Intrinsic Motivation guidEd exploratioN meThOd foR LLM Reasoning (i-MENTOR)<n>i-MENTOR introduces three key innovations: trajectory-aware exploration rewards that mitigate bias in token-level strategies; dynamic reward scaling to stabilize exploration and exploitation in large action spaces; and advantage-preserving reward implementation that maintains
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:30:28Z)
• DGRO: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Exploration-Exploitation Control and Reward Variance Management [18.953750405635393]
  Decoupled Group Reward Optimization (DGRO) is a general RL algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>We show that DGRO achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Logic dataset with an average accuracy of 96.9%, and demonstrates strong generalization across mathematical benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T10:44:49Z)
• LLMs are Greedy Agents: Effects of RL Fine-tuning on Decision-Making Abilities [21.42711537107199]
  We study why Large Language Models (LLMs) perform sub-optimally in decision-making scenarios.<n>We propose mitigation of these shortcomings by fine-tuning via Reinforcement Learning (RL) on self-generated CoT rationales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T17:57:14Z)
• Entropy-based Exploration Conduction for Multi-step Reasoning [15.589134593402589]
  In large language model (LLM) reasoning, multi-step processes have proven effective for solving complex tasks.<n>Existing methods to automatically decide the depth often bring high costs and lack flexibility.<n>We propose Entropy-based Exploration Depth Conduction (Entro-duction) to dynamically adjust the exploration depth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T05:03:26Z)
• R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-wise Group Relative Policy Optimization [86.32257216965229]
  We propose a new online reinforcement learning framework that enables MLLMs to self-improve reasoning ability via simple, effective and dense step-wise rewarding.<n>StepGRPO introduces two novel rule-based reasoning rewards: Step-wise Reasoning Accuracy Reward (StepRAR) and Step-wise Reasoning Validity Reward (StepRVR)<n>With the proposed StepGRPO, we introduce R1-VL, a series of MLLMs with outstanding capabilities in step-by-step reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T08:51:44Z)
• Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Search [57.28671084993782]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Recent studies have shown that increasing test-time computation enhances LLMs' reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose a two-stage training paradigm: 1) a small-scale format tuning stage to internalize the COAT reasoning format and 2) a large-scale self-improvement stage leveraging reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T17:26:58Z)
• RAG-Star: Enhancing Deliberative Reasoning with Retrieval Augmented Verification and Refinement [85.08223786819532]
  Existing large language models (LLMs) show exceptional problem-solving capabilities but might struggle with complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose textbfRAG-Star, a novel RAG approach that integrates retrieved information to guide the tree-based deliberative reasoning process.<n>Our experiments involving Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and GPT-4o demonstrate that RAG-Star significantly outperforms previous RAG and reasoning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T13:05:36Z)
• Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in LLM using Soft RLLF for Enhanced Negation Understanding [4.799288023353623]
  Finetuning approaches in NLP often focus on exploitation rather than exploration, which may lead to suboptimal models. We leverage Reinforcement Learning from Logical Feedback to create an effective balance between exploration and exploitation in language models. This has implications for the development of more accurate, reliable, and logically consistent language models in high-stakes domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T11:54:55Z)
• DetermLR: Augmenting LLM-based Logical Reasoning from Indeterminacy to Determinacy [76.58614128865652]
  We propose DetermLR, a novel perspective that rethinks the reasoning process as an evolution from indeterminacy to determinacy. First, we categorize known conditions into two types: determinate and indeterminate premises This provides an oveall direction for the reasoning process and guides LLMs in converting indeterminate data into progressively determinate insights. We automate the storage and extraction of available premises and reasoning paths with reasoning memory, preserving historical reasoning details for subsequent reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T10:05:51Z)
• Ladder-of-Thought: Using Knowledge as Steps to Elevate Stance Detection [73.31406286956535]
  We introduce the Ladder-of-Thought (LoT) for the stance detection task. LoT directs the small LMs to assimilate high-quality external knowledge, refining the intermediate rationales produced. Our empirical evaluations underscore LoT's efficacy, marking a 16% improvement over GPT-3.5 and a 10% enhancement compared to GPT-3.5 with CoT on stance detection task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T14:31:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.