Job Market Cheat Codes: Prototyping Salary Prediction and Job Grouping with Synthetic Job Listings
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15879v1
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 20:55:33 GMT
- Title: Job Market Cheat Codes: Prototyping Salary Prediction and Job Grouping with Synthetic Job Listings
- Authors: Abdel Rahman Alsheyab, Mohammad Alkhasawneh, Nidal Shahin,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a machine learning methodology prototype using a large synthetic dataset of job listings.<n>It aims to uncover the key features influencing job market dynamics and provide valuable insights for job seekers, employers, and researchers.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a machine learning methodology prototype using a large synthetic dataset of job listings to identify trends, predict salaries, and group similar job roles. Employing techniques such as regression, classification, clustering, and natural language processing (NLP) for text-based feature extraction and representation, this study aims to uncover the key features influencing job market dynamics and provide valuable insights for job seekers, employers, and researchers. Exploratory data analysis was conducted to understand the dataset's characteristics. Subsequently, regression models were developed to predict salaries, classification models to predict job titles, and clustering techniques were applied to group similar jobs. The analyses revealed significant factors influencing salary and job roles, and identified distinct job clusters based on the provided data. While the results are based on synthetic data and not intended for real-world deployment, the methodology demonstrates a transferable framework for job market analysis.
Related papers
- Enhancing Job Salary Prediction with Disentangled Composition Effect Modeling: A Neural Prototyping Approach [19.541536821635113]
understanding how job skills influence salary is crucial for promoting recruitment with competitive salary systems and aligned salary expectations.<n>We propose a novel explainable set-based neural prototyping approach, namely bftextLGDESetNet, for explainable salary prediction.<n>Our method achieves superior performance than state-of-the-art baselines in salary prediction while providing explainable insights into salary-influencing patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T09:36:07Z) - Meta-Statistical Learning: Supervised Learning of Statistical Inference [59.463430294611626]
This work demonstrates that the tools and principles driving the success of large language models (LLMs) can be repurposed to tackle distribution-level tasks.<n>We propose meta-statistical learning, a framework inspired by multi-instance learning that reformulates statistical inference tasks as supervised learning problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T18:04:39Z) - Enhancing Talent Employment Insights Through Feature Extraction with LLM Finetuning [0.0]
We develop a robust pipeline to identify variables such as remote work availability, remuneration structures, educational requirements, and work experience preferences.<n>Our methodology combines semantic chunking, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and fine-tuning DistilBERT models to overcome the limitations of traditional parsing tools.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation of our fine-tuned models and analyze their strengths, limitations, and potential for scaling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-13T19:49:49Z) - The role of data-induced randomness in quantum machine learning classification tasks [0.0]
We introduce a metric for binary classification tasks, the class margin, by merging the concepts of average randomness and classification margin.<n>This metric analytically connects data-induced randomness with classification accuracy for a given data-embedding map.<n>We benchmark a range of data-embedding strategies through class margin, demonstrating that data-induced randomness imposes a limit on classification performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-28T17:26:35Z) - Computational Job Market Analysis with Natural Language Processing [5.117211717291377]
This thesis investigates Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology for extracting relevant information from job descriptions.
We frame the problem, obtaining annotated data, and introducing extraction methodologies.
Our contributions include job description datasets, a de-identification dataset, and a novel active learning algorithm for efficient model training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T14:52:38Z) - Prospector Heads: Generalized Feature Attribution for Large Models & Data [82.02696069543454]
We introduce prospector heads, an efficient and interpretable alternative to explanation-based attribution methods.
We demonstrate how prospector heads enable improved interpretation and discovery of class-specific patterns in input data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T23:01:28Z) - Capture the Flag: Uncovering Data Insights with Large Language Models [90.47038584812925]
This study explores the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the discovery of insights in data.
We propose a new evaluation methodology based on a "capture the flag" principle, measuring the ability of such models to recognize meaningful and pertinent information (flags) in a dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T14:20:06Z) - Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs)
We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing.
We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z) - Generalization Properties of Retrieval-based Models [50.35325326050263]
Retrieval-based machine learning methods have enjoyed success on a wide range of problems.
Despite growing literature showcasing the promise of these models, the theoretical underpinning for such models remains underexplored.
We present a formal treatment of retrieval-based models to characterize their generalization ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-06T00:33:01Z) - Adaptive Sampling Strategies to Construct Equitable Training Datasets [0.7036032466145111]
In domains ranging from computer vision to natural language processing, machine learning models have been shown to exhibit stark disparities.
One factor contributing to these performance gaps is a lack of representation in the data the models are trained on.
We formalize the problem of creating equitable training datasets, and propose a statistical framework for addressing this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-31T19:19:30Z) - Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations
in Training Data [85.43008636875345]
We show that diverse representation in training data is key to increasing subgroup performances and achieving population level objectives.
Our analysis and experiments describe how dataset compositions influence performance and provide constructive results for using trends in existing data, alongside domain knowledge, to help guide intentional, objective-aware dataset design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-05T00:27:08Z) - Topology-based Clusterwise Regression for User Segmentation and Demand
Forecasting [63.78344280962136]
Using a public and a novel proprietary data set of commercial data, this research shows that the proposed system enables analysts to both cluster their user base and plan demand at a granular level.
This work seeks to introduce TDA-based clustering of time series and clusterwise regression with matrix factorization methods as viable tools for the practitioner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-08T12:10:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.