AICO: Feature Significance Tests for Supervised Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23396v4
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 22:21:34 GMT
• Title: AICO: Feature Significance Tests for Supervised Learning
• Authors: Kay Giesecke, Enguerrand Horel, Chartsiri Jirachotkulthorn,
• Abstract summary: AICO asks, for any trained regression or classification model, whether each feature genuinely improves model performance.<n>It does so by masking the feature's information and measuring the resulting change in performance.<n>AICO consistently pinpoints the variables that drive model behavior.
• Score: 0.9474649136535703
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning has become a central tool across scientific, industrial, and policy domains. Algorithms now identify chemical properties, forecast disease risk, screen borrowers, and guide public interventions. Yet this predictive power often comes at the cost of transparency: we rarely know which input features truly drive a model's predictions. Without such understanding, researchers cannot draw reliable scientific conclusions, practitioners cannot ensure fairness or accountability, and policy makers cannot trust or govern model-based decisions. Despite its importance, existing tools for assessing feature influence are limited -- most lack statistical guarantees, and many require costly retraining or surrogate modeling, making them impractical for large modern models. We introduce AICO, a broadly applicable framework that turns model interpretability into an efficient statistical exercise. AICO asks, for any trained regression or classification model, whether each feature genuinely improves model performance. It does so by masking the feature's information and measuring the resulting change in performance. The method delivers exact, finite-sample inference -- exact feature p-values and confidence intervals -- without any retraining, surrogate modeling, or distributional assumptions, making it feasible for today's large-scale algorithms. In both controlled experiments and real applications -- from credit scoring to mortgage-behavior prediction -- AICO consistently pinpoints the variables that drive model behavior, providing a fast and reliable path toward transparent and trustworthy machine learning.

Related papers

• From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models [77.04403907729738]
  This survey charts the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior.<n>We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers.<n>This survey argues that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T06:21:31Z)
• TruthTensor: Evaluating LLMs through Human Imitation on Prediction Market under Drift and Holistic Reasoning [0.0]
  This paper introduces TruthTensor, a novel, reproducible evaluation paradigm that measures reasoning models.<n>Building on forward-looking, contamination-free tasks, our framework anchors evaluation to live prediction markets.<n>TruthTensor demonstrates that models with similar forecast accuracy can diverge markedly in calibration, drift, and risk-sensitivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T03:11:47Z)
• Explaining Machine Learning Predictive Models through Conditional Expectation Methods [0.0]
  MUCE is a model-agnostic method for local explainability designed to capture prediction changes from feature interactions.<n>Two quantitative indices, stability and uncertainty, summarize local behavior and assess model reliability.<n>Results show that MUCE effectively captures complex local model behavior, while the stability and uncertainty indices provide meaningful insight into prediction confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T08:34:36Z)
• From Physics to Machine Learning and Back: Part II - Learning and Observational Bias in PHM [52.64097278841485]
  Review examines how incorporating learning and observational biases through physics-informed modeling and data strategies can guide models toward physically consistent and reliable predictions.<n>Fast adaptation methods including meta-learning and few-shot learning are reviewed alongside domain generalization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:15:43Z)
• Is Uncertainty Quantification a Viable Alternative to Learned Deferral? [0.5156484100374058]
  One aspect of AI safety is the models' ability to defer decisions to a human expert.<n>During clinical translation, models often face challenges such as data shift.<n>Uncertainty quantification methods may be a promising choice for AI deferral.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T11:37:59Z)
• Testing Conditional Mean Independence Using Generative Neural Networks [8.323172773256449]
  We introduce a novel population CMI measure and a bootstrap model-based testing procedure.<n>Deep generative neural networks are used to estimate the conditional mean functions involved in the population measure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T23:35:24Z)
• Testing and Improving the Robustness of Amortized Bayesian Inference for Cognitive Models [0.5223954072121659]
  Contaminant observations and outliers often cause problems when estimating the parameters of cognitive models.<n>In this study, we test and improve the robustness of parameter estimation using amortized Bayesian inference.<n>The proposed method is straightforward and practical to implement and has a broad applicability in fields where outlier detection or removal is challenging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-29T21:22:24Z)
• The Mirrored Influence Hypothesis: Efficient Data Influence Estimation by Harnessing Forward Passes [30.30769701138665]
  We introduce and explore the Mirrored Influence Hypothesis, highlighting a reciprocal nature of influence between training and test data. Specifically, it suggests that evaluating the influence of training data on test predictions can be reformulated as an equivalent, yet inverse problem. We introduce a new method for estimating the influence of training data, which requires calculating gradients for specific test samples, paired with a forward pass for each training point.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T03:43:05Z)
• Position: AI Evaluation Should Learn from How We Test Humans [65.36614996495983]
  We argue that psychometrics, a theory originating in the 20th century for human assessment, could be a powerful solution to the challenges in today's AI evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T09:54:33Z)
• Evaluating Explainability in Machine Learning Predictions through Explainer-Agnostic Metrics [0.0]
  We develop six distinct model-agnostic metrics designed to quantify the extent to which model predictions can be explained. These metrics measure different aspects of model explainability, ranging from local importance, global importance, and surrogate predictions. We demonstrate the practical utility of these metrics on classification and regression tasks, and integrate these metrics into an existing Python package for public use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T15:28:36Z)
• Modeling Uncertain Feature Representation for Domain Generalization [49.129544670700525]
  We show that our method consistently improves the network generalization ability on multiple vision tasks. Our methods are simple yet effective and can be readily integrated into networks without additional trainable parameters or loss constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T14:25:02Z)
• Uncertainty Modeling for Out-of-Distribution Generalization [56.957731893992495]
  We argue that the feature statistics can be properly manipulated to improve the generalization ability of deep learning models. Common methods often consider the feature statistics as deterministic values measured from the learned features. We improve the network generalization ability by modeling the uncertainty of domain shifts with synthesized feature statistics during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T16:09:12Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty [66.17147341354577]
  We argue for considering a complementary form of transparency by estimating and communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions. We describe how uncertainty can be used to mitigate model unfairness, augment decision-making, and build trustworthy systems. This work constitutes an interdisciplinary review drawn from literature spanning machine learning, visualization/HCI, design, decision-making, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T17:26:14Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
• Estimating Structural Target Functions using Machine Learning and Influence Functions [103.47897241856603]
  We propose a new framework for statistical machine learning of target functions arising as identifiable functionals from statistical models. This framework is problem- and model-agnostic and can be used to estimate a broad variety of target parameters of interest in applied statistics. We put particular focus on so-called coarsening at random/doubly robust problems with partially unobserved information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-14T16:48:29Z)
• Efficient nonparametric statistical inference on population feature importance using Shapley values [7.6146285961466]
  We present a procedure for estimating and obtaining valid statistical inference on the Shapley Population Variable Importance Measure (SPVIM) Although the computational complexity of the true SPVIM exponentially with the number of variables, we propose an estimator based on randomly sampling only $Theta(n)$ feature subsets given $n$ observations. Our procedure has good finite-sample performance in simulations, and for an in-hospital prediction task produces similar variable importance estimates when different machine learning algorithms are applied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T19:47:11Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.