A Fuzzy Supervisor Agent Design for Clinical Reasoning Assistance in a Multi-Agent Educational Clinical Scenario Simulation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05275v1
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2025 21:51:27 GMT
- Title: A Fuzzy Supervisor Agent Design for Clinical Reasoning Assistance in a Multi-Agent Educational Clinical Scenario Simulation
- Abstract summary: This paper presents the design and architecture of the Fuzzy Supervisor Agent (FSA)<n>The FSA is a novel component for the Multi-Agent Educational Clinical Scenario Simulation (MAECSS) platform.<n>By analyzing student decision-making processes in real-time, the FSA is designed to deliver adaptive, context-aware feedback.
- Score: 1.8142288667655782
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Assisting medical students with clinical reasoning (CR) during clinical scenario training remains a persistent challenge in medical education. This paper presents the design and architecture of the Fuzzy Supervisor Agent (FSA), a novel component for the Multi-Agent Educational Clinical Scenario Simulation (MAECSS) platform. The FSA leverages a Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) to continuously interpret student interactions with specialized clinical agents (e.g., patient, physical exam, diagnostic, intervention) using pre-defined fuzzy rule bases for professionalism, medical relevance, ethical behavior, and contextual distraction. By analyzing student decision-making processes in real-time, the FSA is designed to deliver adaptive, context-aware feedback and provides assistance precisely when students encounter difficulties. This work focuses on the technical framework and rationale of the FSA, highlighting its potential to provide scalable, flexible, and human-like supervision in simulation-based medical education. Future work will include empirical evaluation and integration into broader educational settings. More detailed design and implementation is~\href{https://github.com/2sigmaEdTech/MAS/}{open sourced here}.
Related papers
- Medical Model Synthesis Architectures: A Case Study [72.46211022258122]
Current AI systems struggle with calibrated reasoning under uncertainty.<n>We propose a framework for AI systems that can make practically useful but formally transparent clinical predictions under uncertainty.<n>We show how an initial proof-of-concept of this framework can be used for differential diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T19:30:16Z) - Persona-Based Requirements Engineering for Explainable Multi-Agent Educational Systems: A Scenario Simulator for Clinical Reasoning Training [1.578928880409315]
It is critical to ensure that Multi-Agent Education System (MAES) is explainable from the early stages of requirements engineering.<n>This paper proposes a human-first, persona-driven, explainable MAES RE framework and demonstrates the framework through a MAES for clinical reasoning training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-19T01:18:44Z) - MedCollab: Causal-Driven Multi-Agent Collaboration for Full-Cycle Clinical Diagnosis via IBIS-Structured Argumentation [6.334763475104128]
We present MedCollab, a novel multi-agent framework that emulates the hierarchical consultation workflow of modern hospitals.<n>The framework incorporates a dynamic specialist recruitment mechanism that adaptively assembles clinical and examination agents according to patient-specific symptoms and examination results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-01T14:25:58Z) - Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection [49.091903570068155]
We propose ACTMED (Adaptive Clinical Test selection via Model-based Experimental Design) to better emulate real-world diagnostic reasoning.<n>LLMs act as flexible simulators, generating plausible patient state distributions and supporting belief updates without requiring structured, task-specific training data.<n>We evaluate ACTMED on real-world datasets and show it can optimize test selection to improve diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and resource use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T18:10:45Z) - Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z) - Designing and Evaluating an AI-driven Immersive Multidisciplinary Simulation (AIMS) for Interprofessional Education [9.141423579002542]
AIMS is a virtual simulation that integrates a large language model (Gemini-2.5-Flash), a Unity-based virtual environment engine, and a character creation pipeline.<n>AIMS was designed to enhance collaborative clinical reasoning and health promotion competencies among students from pharmacy, medicine, nursing, and social work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T01:09:18Z) - Reasoning LLMs in the Medical Domain: A Literature Survey [2.028864261411204]
The emergence of advanced reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) marks a transformative development in healthcare applications.<n>This survey examines the transformation of medical LLMs from basic information retrieval tools to sophisticated clinical reasoning systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-26T14:59:19Z) - Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z) - Learning to Be A Doctor: Searching for Effective Medical Agent Architectures [32.82784216021035]
This paper introduces a novel framework for the automated design of medical agent architectures.<n>Motivated by the success of automated machine learning (AutoML), we define a hierarchical and expressive agent search space.<n>Our framework conceptualizes medical agents as graph-based architectures composed of diverse, functional node types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-15T15:44:21Z) - MedAgent-Pro: Towards Evidence-based Multi-modal Medical Diagnosis via Reasoning Agentic Workflow [14.478357882578234]
In modern medicine, clinical diagnosis relies on the comprehensive analysis of primarily textual and visual data.<n>Recent advances in large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and agent-based methods hold great potential for medical diagnosis.<n>We propose MedAgent-Pro, a new agentic reasoning paradigm that follows the diagnosis principle in modern medicine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T14:04:18Z) - Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice through Interactive Sequential Benchmarking [58.25862290294702]
We present MedChain, a dataset of 12,163 clinical cases that covers five key stages of clinical workflow.<n>We also propose MedChain-Agent, an AI system that integrates a feedback mechanism and a MCase-RAG module to learn from previous cases and adapt its responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T15:25:02Z) - Towards Next-Generation Medical Agent: How o1 is Reshaping Decision-Making in Medical Scenarios [46.729092855387165]
We study the choice of the backbone LLM for medical AI agents, which is the foundation for the agent's overall reasoning and action generation.<n>Our findings demonstrate o1's ability to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency, paving the way for smarter, more responsive AI tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-16T18:19:53Z) - Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer [50.83806796466396]
Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative class of AI tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare.
This tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T15:41:56Z) - Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions.
VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information.
We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z) - Leveraging Large Language Model as Simulated Patients for Clinical Education [18.67200160979337]
High cost of training and hiring qualified SPs limit students' access to this type of clinical training.
With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), their exceptional capabilities in conversational artificial intelligence and role-playing have been demonstrated.
We present an integrated model-agnostic framework called CureFun that harnesses the potential of LLMs in clinical medical education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-13T06:36:32Z) - A Trustworthy Framework for Medical Image Analysis with Deep Learning [71.48204494889505]
TRUDLMIA is a trustworthy deep learning framework for medical image analysis.
It is anticipated that the framework will support researchers and clinicians in advancing the use of deep learning for dealing with public health crises including COVID-19.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-06T05:30:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.