Relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10440v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:54:37 GMT
• Title: Relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory
• Authors: Urjit A. Yajnik,
• Abstract summary: relativistic quantum physics differs fundamentally from the non-relativistic wave mechanics.<n>It requires a formalism allowing creation and destruction of particles.<n>This article is a semi-historic account of the intriguing new features which emerge as a part of quantum field theory.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Relativistic quantum mechanics can be considered to have begun with a search for wave equations corresponding to each intrinsic spin. However, relativistic quantum physics differs fundamentally from the non-relativistic wave mechanics. It requires a formalism allowing \ creation and destruction of particles. This gets proper treatment only in a framework called quantum field theory. This article is a semi-historic account of the intriguing new features which emerge as a part of quantum field theory. Such a discussion is impossible without a basic presentation of the formalism itself. Hence some mathematics is included in finer print. The article is directed mostly to those familiar with essential classical mechanics and basic quantum mechanics, though I strive to provide a flavour of the subject to the keenly interested non-physics reader.

Related papers

• Observation of Quantum Darwinism and the Origin of Classicality with Superconducting Circuits [9.09683951826704]
  How can we rationalize everyday classical observations from an inherently quantum world?<n>Quantum Darwinism offers a compelling framework to explain this emergence of classicality.<n>We observe the highly structured branching quantum states that support classicality and the saturation of quantum mutual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:33:32Z)
• A Short Guide to Quantum Mechanics -- Some Basic Principles [0.0]
  It starts by asking whether quantum physics is important, or weird, or incomprehensible. It explains why particles sometimes behave like waves, and how uncertainty and randomness enter physics. Modern topics, like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and quantum computing are also covered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T17:14:54Z)
• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• A Theory of Quantum Jumps [44.99833362998488]
  We study fluorescence and the phenomenon of quantum jumps'' in idealized models of atoms coupled to the quantized electromagnetic field. Our results amount to a derivation of the fundamental randomness in the quantum-mechanical description of microscopic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T11:00:46Z)
• Postulating the Unicity of the Macroscopic Physical World [0.0]
  We argue that the unicity of the macroscopic world is a fundamental postulate of physics, rather than an issue that must be mathematically justified or demonstrated. This is made possible by using general operator algebras to extend the mathematical description of the physical world towards macroscopic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T19:21:36Z)
• Quantum data learning for quantum simulations in high-energy physics [55.41644538483948]
  We explore the applicability of quantum-data learning to practical problems in high-energy physics. We make use of ansatz based on quantum convolutional neural networks and numerically show that it is capable of recognizing quantum phases of ground states. The observation of non-trivial learning properties demonstrated in these benchmarks will motivate further exploration of the quantum-data learning architecture in high-energy physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T18:00:01Z)
• An ontological description for relativistic, massive bosons [0.0]
  Locality holds for the quantum theory, and seems to be fully obeyed also by the classical treatment. We do discuss extensively the distinction between the quantum treatment and the classical one, even though they produce exactly the same equations mathematically. It is suggested to apply this theory for real time quantum model simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T14:53:02Z)
• The measurement problem in the light of the theory of decoherence [0.0]
  This paper proposes an exhaustive solution to the measurement problem in view of the theory of decoherence. Considering the latter as a probabilistic theory all along allows us to avoid the usual probability problem of the many-worlds interpretations. A thorough verification of the consistency of quantum mechanics at all scales is proposed, as well as a discussion of what can be deemed an observer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T19:47:52Z)
• Mesoscopic Quantum Thermo-mechanics: a new frontier of experimental physics [0.0]
  Experimentalists have demonstrated their ability to control mechanical modes within mesoscopic objects down to the quantum level. It is now possible to create mechanical Fock states, to entangle mechanical modes from distinct objects, store quantum information or transfer it from one quantum bit to another. All of this is in particular referred to as a new engineering resource for quantum technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T13:35:13Z)
• Quantum tomography explains quantum mechanics [0.0]
  A suggestive notion for what constitutes a quantum detector leads to a logically impeccable definition of measurement. The various forms of quantum tomography for quantum states, quantum detectors, quantum processes, and quantum instruments are discussed. The new approach is closer to actual practice than the traditional foundations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T14:09:30Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.