CANDLE: A Cross-Modal Agentic Knowledge Distillation Framework for Interpretable Sarcopenia Diagnosis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21179v2
• Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:38:14 GMT
• Title: CANDLE: A Cross-Modal Agentic Knowledge Distillation Framework for Interpretable Sarcopenia Diagnosis
• Authors: Yuqi Jin, Zhenhao Shuai, Zihan Hu, Weiteng Zhang, Weihao Xie, Jianwei Shuai, Xian Shen, Zhen Feng,
• Abstract summary: CANDLE mitigates the interpretability-performance trade-off, enhances predictive accuracy, and preserves high decision consistency.<n>The framework offers a scalable approach to knowledge assetization of TML models, enabling interpretable, reproducible, and clinically aligned decision support in sarcopenia and potentially broader medical domains.
• Score: 3.0245458192729466
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Background and Aims: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable generalization and transfer capabilities by learning from vast corpora of text and web data. Their semantic representations allow cross-task knowledge transfer and reasoning, offering promising opportunities for data-scarce and heterogeneous domains such as clinical medicine. Yet, in diagnostic tasks like sarcopenia, major challenges remain: interpretability, transparency, and deployment efficiency. Traditional machine learning (TML) models provide stable performance and feature-level attribution, ensuring traceable and auditable decision logic, but lack semantic breadth. Conversely, LLMs enable flexible inference but often function as opaque predictors. Existing integration strategies remain shallow, rarely embedding the structured reasoning of TML into LLM inference. Methods: Using sarcopenia diagnosis as a case study, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were extracted from a baseline XGBoost model and transformed into structured, LLM-compatible representations. An actor-critic reinforcement learning (RL) strategy guided the LLM to reason over these SHAP-based inputs, producing calibrated rationales and refined decision rules. The distilled reasoning was consolidated into a structured knowledge repository and deployed via retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for case-based inference. Results: (Omitted here.) Conclusion: By coupling SHAP-derived statistical evidence with reinforcement-trained LLM reasoning, CANDLE mitigates the interpretability-performance trade-off, enhances predictive accuracy, and preserves high decision consistency. The framework offers a scalable approach to knowledge assetization of TML models, enabling interpretable, reproducible, and clinically aligned decision support in sarcopenia and potentially broader medical domains.

Related papers

• A Monosemantic Attribution Framework for Stable Interpretability in Clinical Neuroscience Large Language Models [9.694820939059339]
  Interpretability remains a key challenge for deploying large language models (LLMs) in clinical settings such as Alzheimer's disease progression diagnosis.<n>We introduce a unified interpretability framework that integrates attributional and mechanistic perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T19:03:04Z)
• How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patterns [51.02752099869218]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) display strikingly different generalization behaviors.<n>We introduce a novel benchmark that decomposes reasoning into atomic core skills.<n>We show that RL-tuned models maintain more stable behavioral profiles and resist collapse in reasoning skills, whereas SFT models exhibit sharper drift and overfit to surface patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T08:16:20Z)
• Knowledge Elicitation with Large Language Models for Interpretable Cancer Stage Identification from Pathology Reports [2.5829043503611318]
  We introduce two Knowledge Elicitation methods designed to overcome limitations by enabling large language models to induce and apply domain-specific rules for cancer staging.<n>The first, Knowledge Elicitation with Long-Term Memory (KEwLTM), uses an iterative prompting strategy to derive staging rules directly from unannotated pathology reports.<n>The second, Knowledge Elicitation with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KEwRAG), employs a variation of RAG where rules are pre-extracted from relevant guidelines in a single step and then applied, enhancing interpretability and avoiding repeated retrieval overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-02T19:00:40Z)
• OncoReason: Structuring Clinical Reasoning in LLMs for Robust and Interpretable Survival Prediction [2.904892426557913]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in biomedical NLP.<n>We present a unified, multi-task learning framework that aligns autoregressive LLMs with clinical reasoning for outcome prediction.<n>Our findings underscore the importance of reasoning-aware alignment in multi-task clinical modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T13:35:12Z)
• Pushing LLMs to Their Logical Reasoning Bound: The Role of Data Reasoning Intensity [59.27594125465172]
  We introduce Data Reasoning Intensity (DRI), a novel metric that quantifies the latent logical reasoning complexity of samples.<n>We then introduce a re-cognizing optimization strategy that systematically enhances the logical reasoning intensity of training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T14:20:04Z)
• LLM-based Agents for Automated Confounder Discovery and Subgroup Analysis in Causal Inference [1.1538255621565348]
  We propose Large Language Model-based agents for automated confounder discovery and subgroup analysis.<n>Our framework systematically performs subgroup identification and confounding structure discovery.<n>Our findings suggest that LLM-based agents offer a promising path toward scalable, trustworthy, and semantically aware causal inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T07:45:49Z)
• CTRLS: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Latent State-Transition [57.51370433303236]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning enables large language models to break down complex problems into interpretable intermediate steps.<n>We introduce groundingS, a framework that formulates CoT reasoning as a Markov decision process (MDP) with latent state transitions.<n>We show improvements in reasoning accuracy, diversity, and exploration efficiency across benchmark reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T21:32:18Z)
• Look & Mark: Leveraging Radiologist Eye Fixations and Bounding boxes in Multimodal Large Language Models for Chest X-ray Report Generation [2.821158017021184]
  Look & Mark (L&M) is a novel grounding fixation strategy that integrates radiologist eye fixations (Look) and bounding box annotations (Mark)<n>General-purpose models also benefit from L&M combined with in-context learning, with LLaVA-OV achieving an 87.3% clinical average performance (C.AVG)-the highest among all models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T10:54:40Z)
• Can LLMs Assist Expert Elicitation for Probabilistic Causal Modeling? [0.0]
  This study investigates the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) as an alternative to human expert elicitation for extracting structured causal knowledge.<n>LLMs generated causal structures, specifically Bayesian networks (BNs), were benchmarked against traditional statistical methods.<n>LLMs generated BNs demonstrated lower entropy than expert-elicited and statistically generated BNs, suggesting higher confidence and precision in predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T16:45:52Z)
• MoRE-LLM: Mixture of Rule Experts Guided by a Large Language Model [54.14155564592936]
  We propose a Mixture of Rule Experts guided by a Large Language Model (MoRE-LLM)<n>MoRE-LLM steers the discovery of local rule-based surrogates during training and their utilization for the classification task.<n>LLM is responsible for enhancing the domain knowledge alignment of the rules by correcting and contextualizing them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T11:09:21Z)
• AutoElicit: Using Large Language Models for Expert Prior Elicitation in Predictive Modelling [53.54623137152208]
  We introduce AutoElicit to extract knowledge from large language models and construct priors for predictive models.<n>We show these priors are informative and can be refined using natural language.<n>We find that AutoElicit yields priors that can substantially reduce error over uninformative priors, using fewer labels, and consistently outperform in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T10:13:39Z)
• Reasoning-Enhanced Healthcare Predictions with Knowledge Graph Community Retrieval [61.70489848327436]
  KARE is a novel framework that integrates knowledge graph (KG) community-level retrieval with large language models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that KARE outperforms leading models by up to 10.8-15.0% on MIMIC-III and 12.6-12.7% on MIMIC-IV for mortality and readmission predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:46:28Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• Achieving interpretable machine learning by functional decomposition of black-box models into explainable predictor effects [4.3500439062103435]
  We propose a novel approach for the functional decomposition of black-box predictions. Similar to additive regression models, our method provides insights into the direction and strength of the main feature contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T10:37:29Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• PoLLMgraph: Unraveling Hallucinations in Large Language Models via State Transition Dynamics [51.17512229589]
  PoLLMgraph is a model-based white-box detection and forecasting approach for large language models. We show that hallucination can be effectively detected by analyzing the LLM's internal state transition dynamics. Our work paves a new way for model-based white-box analysis of LLMs, motivating the research community to further explore, understand, and refine the intricate dynamics of LLM behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T20:02:20Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models as Post-hoc Correctors [6.288056740658763]
  We show that an LLM can work as a post-hoc corrector to propose corrections for the predictions of an arbitrary Machine Learning model. We form a contextual knowledge database by incorporating the dataset's label information and the ML model's predictions on the validation dataset. Our experimental results on text analysis and the challenging molecular predictions show that model improves the performance of a number of models by up to 39%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T22:50:41Z)
• Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic Structures [74.93762031957883]
  This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code. At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes. We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z)
• Interpretable Medical Diagnostics with Structured Data Extraction by Large Language Models [59.89454513692417]
  Tabular data is often hidden in text, particularly in medical diagnostic reports. We propose a novel, simple, and effective methodology for extracting structured tabular data from textual medical reports, called TEMED-LLM. We demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text classification models in medical diagnostics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:12:28Z)
• Transfer Learning without Knowing: Reprogramming Black-box Machine Learning Models with Scarce Data and Limited Resources [78.72922528736011]
  We propose a novel approach, black-box adversarial reprogramming (BAR), that repurposes a well-trained black-box machine learning model. Using zeroth order optimization and multi-label mapping techniques, BAR can reprogram a black-box ML model solely based on its input-output responses. BAR outperforms state-of-the-art methods and yields comparable performance to the vanilla adversarial reprogramming method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T01:52:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.