From Trial-and-Error to Improvement: A Systematic Analysis of LLM Exploration Mechanisms in RLVR
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07534v2
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 10:01:44 GMT
- Title: From Trial-and-Error to Improvement: A Systematic Analysis of LLM Exploration Mechanisms in RLVR
- Authors: Jia Deng, Jie Chen, Zhipeng Chen, Daixuan Cheng, Fei Bai, Beichen Zhang, Yinqian Min, Yanzipeng Gao, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong Wen,
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>This technical report presents a systematic investigation of exploration capacities in RLVR, covering four main aspects.
- Score: 92.51110344832178
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Unlike traditional RL approaches, RLVR leverages rule-based feedback to guide LLMs in generating and refining complex reasoning chains -- a process critically dependent on effective exploration strategies. While prior work has demonstrated RLVR's empirical success, the fundamental mechanisms governing LLMs' exploration behaviors remain underexplored. This technical report presents a systematic investigation of exploration capacities in RLVR, covering four main aspects: (1) exploration space shaping, where we develop quantitative metrics to characterize LLMs' capability boundaries; (2) entropy-performance exchange, analyzed across training stages, individual instances, and token-level patterns; and (3) RL performance optimization, examining methods to effectively translate exploration gains into measurable improvements. By unifying previously identified insights with new empirical evidence, this work aims to provide a foundational framework for advancing RLVR systems.
Related papers
- Guiding Exploration in Reinforcement Learning Through LLM-Augmented Observations [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) possess procedural knowledge and reasoning capabilities from text pretraining.<n>We propose a framework that provides LLM-generated action recommendations through augmented observation spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T19:54:31Z) - Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Models: A Survey of Advancements and Applications Across the LLM Lifecycle [66.80133103857703]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has markedly enhanced the reasoning and alignment performance of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This survey aims to present researchers and practitioners with the latest developments and frontier trends at the intersection of RL and LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T13:11:28Z) - RL-PLUS: Countering Capability Boundary Collapse of LLMs in Reinforcement Learning with Hybrid-policy Optimization [86.30192066451256]
We propose RL-PLUS, a novel hybrid-policy optimization approach for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n> RL-PLUS synergizes internal exploitation with external data to achieve stronger reasoning capabilities and surpass the boundaries of base models.<n>We provide both theoretical analysis and extensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority and generalizability of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-31T23:55:29Z) - Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities [62.05713042908654]
This paper provides a review of advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)<n>We highlight the necessity of constructing neural reward models from human data and discuss the formal and practical implications of this paradigm shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-17T14:22:24Z) - Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspective on Reinforcement Learning for LLMs [112.40801692473723]
Balancing exploration and exploitation is a central goal in reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We introduce a minimal modification to standard RL with only one line of code: augmenting the advantage function with an entropy-based term.<n>Our method achieves significant gains on the Pass@K metric, even when evaluated with extremely large K values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-17T17:54:03Z) - R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [87.30285670315334]
textbfR1-Searcher is a novel two-stage outcome-based RL approach designed to enhance the search capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Our framework relies exclusively on RL, without requiring process rewards or distillation for a cold start.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous strong RAG methods, even when compared to the closed-source GPT-4o-mini.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T17:14:44Z) - Reinforcement Learning Enhanced LLMs: A Survey [45.57586245741664]
We will make a systematic review of the most up-to-date state of knowledge on RL-enhanced large language models (LLMs)<n>Specifically, we detail the basics of RL; (2) introduce popular RL-enhanced LLMs; (3) review researches on two widely-used reward model-based RL techniques: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-05T16:10:42Z) - Survey on Large Language Model-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning: Concept, Taxonomy, and Methods [18.771658054884693]
Large language models (LLMs) emerge as a promising avenue to augment reinforcement learning (RL) in aspects such as multi-task learning, sample efficiency, and high-level task planning.
We propose a structured taxonomy to systematically categorize LLMs' functionalities in RL, including four roles: information processor, reward designer, decision-maker, and generator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-30T08:28:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.