Computational Economics in Large Language Models: Exploring Model Behavior and Incentive Design under Resource Constraints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10426v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 07:55:45 GMT
• Title: Computational Economics in Large Language Models: Exploring Model Behavior and Incentive Design under Resource Constraints
• Authors: Sandeep Reddy, Kabir Khan, Rohit Patil, Ananya Chakraborty, Faizan A. Khan, Swati Kulkarni, Arjun Verma, Neha Singh,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are limited by substantial computational cost.<n>We introduce a "computational economics" framework that treats an LLM as an internal economy of resource-constrained agents.<n>We show that when computation is scarce, standard LLMs reallocate attention toward high-value tokens while preserving accuracy.
• Score: 1.00707850217229
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are limited by substantial computational cost. We introduce a "computational economics" framework that treats an LLM as an internal economy of resource-constrained agents (attention heads and neuron blocks) that must allocate scarce computation to maximize task utility. First, we show empirically that when computation is scarce, standard LLMs reallocate attention toward high-value tokens while preserving accuracy. Building on this observation, we propose an incentive-driven training paradigm that augments the task loss with a differentiable computation cost term, encouraging sparse and efficient activations. On GLUE (MNLI, STS-B, CoLA) and WikiText-103, the method yields a family of models that trace a Pareto frontier and consistently dominate post-hoc pruning; for a similar accuracy we obtain roughly a forty percent reduction in FLOPS and lower latency, together with more interpretable attention patterns. These results indicate that economic principles offer a principled route to designing efficient, adaptive, and more transparent LLMs under strict resource constraints.

Related papers

• Cognitive Load-Aware Inference: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Optimizing the Token Economy of Large Language Models [0.9790236766474201]
  This paper introduces the Cognitive Load-Aware Inference (CLAI) framework, which operationalizes principles from Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) and neuroscience for Large Language Model (LLM) inference.<n>We formalize the concepts of Intrinsic Cognitive Load, Extraneous Cognitive Load, and Germane Cognitive Load into quantifiable LLM metrics.<n>We propose two implementation paths: CLAI-Prompt, a zero-shot method that guides a base LLM through cognitive control steps via a structured meta-prompt, and CLAI-Tune, a fine-tuned model that internalizes these principles for spontaneous cognitive economy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T10:51:18Z)
• Trajectory Bellman Residual Minimization: A Simple Value-Based Method for LLM Reasoning [55.33984461046492]
  Policy-based methods currently dominate reinforcement learning pipelines for large language model (LLM) reasoning.<n>We introduce Trajectory Bellman Residual Minimization (TBRM), an algorithm that naturally adapts this idea to LLMs.<n>We prove convergence to the near-optimal KL-regularized policy from arbitrary off-policy via an improved change-of-trajectory-measure analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T09:41:53Z)
• Scalable Chain of Thoughts via Elastic Reasoning [61.75753924952059]
  Elastic Reasoning is a novel framework for scalable chain of thoughts.<n>It separates reasoning into two phases--thinking and solution--with independently allocated budgets.<n>Our approach produces more concise and efficient reasoning even in unconstrained settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T15:01:06Z)
• Attention Pruning: Automated Fairness Repair of Language Models via Surrogate Simulated Annealing [14.432850893209817]
  This paper introduces Attention Pruning, a fairness-aware simulated annealing approach to prune attention heads in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our experiments show that Attention Pruning achieves up to $40%$ reduction in gender bias and outperforms the state-of-the-art bias mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T03:02:32Z)
• DSMoE: Matrix-Partitioned Experts with Dynamic Routing for Computation-Efficient Dense LLMs [70.91804882618243]
  This paper proposes DSMoE, a novel approach that achieves sparsification by partitioning pre-trained FFN layers into computational blocks.<n>We implement adaptive expert routing using sigmoid activation and straight-through estimators, enabling tokens to flexibly access different aspects of model knowledge.<n>Experiments on LLaMA models demonstrate that under equivalent computational constraints, DSMoE achieves superior performance compared to existing pruning and MoE approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T02:37:26Z)
• Rational Metareasoning for Large Language Models [17.479428400594028]
  Being prompted to engage in reasoning has emerged as a core technique for using large language models (LLMs)<n>This work introduces a novel approach based on computational models of metareasoning used in cognitive science.<n>We develop a reward function that incorporates the Value of Computation by penalizing unnecessary reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T23:48:52Z)
• Bridging LLMs and KGs without Fine-Tuning: Intermediate Probing Meets Subgraph-Aware Entity Descriptions [49.36683223327633]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) encapsulate extensive world knowledge and exhibit powerful context modeling capabilities.<n>We propose a novel framework that synergizes the strengths of LLMs with robust knowledge representation to enable effective and efficient KGC.<n>We achieve a 47% relative improvement over previous methods based on non-fine-tuned LLMs and, to our knowledge, are the first to achieve classification performance comparable to fine-tuned LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T10:15:55Z)
• Understanding the Performance and Estimating the Cost of LLM Fine-Tuning [9.751868268608675]
  Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) for specific tasks in a cost-effective manner. In this paper, we characterize sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) based LLM fine-tuning to understand their accuracy and runtime performance. We also develop and validate an analytical model to estimate the cost of LLM fine-tuning on the cloud.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T16:26:07Z)
• Language Model Cascades: Token-level uncertainty and beyond [65.38515344964647]
  Recent advances in language models (LMs) have led to significant improvements in quality on complex NLP tasks. Cascading offers a simple strategy to achieve more favorable cost-quality tradeoffs. We show that incorporating token-level uncertainty through learned post-hoc deferral rules can significantly outperform simple aggregation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T21:02:48Z)
• Leveraging Zero-Shot Prompting for Efficient Language Model Distillation [3.4205390087622582]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for efficiently distilling LLMs into smaller, application-specific models. It utilizes LLMs' reasoning capabilities to generate labels and natural language rationales for unlabeled data. Key contributions include the employment of zero-shot prompting to elicit teacher model rationales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T16:51:52Z)
• MobiLlama: Towards Accurate and Lightweight Fully Transparent GPT [87.4910758026772]
  "Bigger the better" has been the predominant trend in recent Large Language Models (LLMs) development. This paper explores the "less is more" paradigm by addressing the challenge of designing accurate yet efficient Small Language Models (SLMs) for resource constrained devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T18:59:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.