From Individual to Multi-Agent Algorithmic Recourse: Minimizing the Welfare Gap via Capacitated Bipartite Matching

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11070v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 21:04:24 GMT
• Title: From Individual to Multi-Agent Algorithmic Recourse: Minimizing the Welfare Gap via Capacitated Bipartite Matching
• Authors: Zahra Khotanlou, Kate Larson, Amir-Hossein Karimi,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel framework for multi-agent algorithmic recourse that accounts for multiple recourse seekers and recourse providers.<n>Our framework enables the many-to-many algorithmic recourse to achieve near-optimal welfare with minimum modification in system settings.
• Score: 9.37591403853433
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Decision makers are increasingly relying on machine learning in sensitive situations. In such settings, algorithmic recourse aims to provide individuals with actionable and minimally costly steps to reverse unfavorable AI-driven decisions. While existing research predominantly focuses on single-individual (i.e., seeker) and single-model (i.e., provider) scenarios, real-world applications often involve multiple interacting stakeholders. Optimizing outcomes for seekers under an individual welfare approach overlooks the inherently multi-agent nature of real-world systems, where individuals interact and compete for limited resources. To address this, we introduce a novel framework for multi-agent algorithmic recourse that accounts for multiple recourse seekers and recourse providers. We model this many-to-many interaction as a capacitated weighted bipartite matching problem, where matches are guided by both recourse cost and provider capacity. Edge weights, reflecting recourse costs, are optimized for social welfare while quantifying the welfare gap between individual welfare and this collectively feasible outcome. We propose a three-layer optimization framework: (1) basic capacitated matching, (2) optimal capacity redistribution to minimize the welfare gap, and (3) cost-aware optimization balancing welfare maximization with capacity adjustment costs. Experimental validation on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrates that our framework enables the many-to-many algorithmic recourse to achieve near-optimal welfare with minimum modification in system settings. This work extends algorithmic recourse from individual recommendations to system-level design, providing a tractable path toward higher social welfare while maintaining individual actionability.

Related papers

• Pareto Optimal Algorithmic Recourse in Multi-cost Function [0.44938884406455726]
  algorithmic recourse aims to identify minimal-cost actions to alter an individual features, thereby obtaining a desired outcome.<n>Most current recourse mechanisms use gradient-based methods that assume cost functions are differentiable, often not applicable in real-world scenarios.<n>This work proposes an algorithmic recourse framework that handles nondifferentiable and discrete multi-cost functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T03:16:08Z)
• A RankNet-Inspired Surrogate-Assisted Hybrid Metaheuristic for Expensive Coverage Optimization [5.757318591302855]
  We propose a RankNet-Inspired Surrogate-assisted Hybrid Metaheuristic to handle large-scale coverage optimization tasks.<n>Our algorithm consistently outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms for EMVOPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T14:49:05Z)
• Learning Reward and Policy Jointly from Demonstration and Preference Improves Alignment [58.049113055986375]
  We develop a single stage approach named Alignment with Integrated Human Feedback (AIHF) to train reward models and the policy.<n>The proposed approach admits a suite of efficient algorithms, which can easily reduce to, and leverage, popular alignment algorithms.<n>We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed solutions with extensive experiments involving alignment problems in LLMs and robotic control problems in MuJoCo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T01:20:53Z)
• Optimal Multi-Fidelity Best-Arm Identification [65.23078799972188]
  In bandit best-arm identification, an algorithm is tasked with finding the arm with highest mean reward with a specified accuracy as fast as possible.<n>We study multi-fidelity best-arm identification, in which the can choose to sample an arm at a lower fidelity (less accurate mean estimate) for a lower cost.<n>Several methods have been proposed for tackling this problem, but their optimality remain elusive, notably due to loose lower bounds on the total cost needed to identify the best arm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T08:02:40Z)
• On the Necessity of Collaboration for Online Model Selection with Decentralized Data [53.244188985271606]
  We consider online model selection with decentralized data over $M$ clients, and study the necessity of collaboration among clients. Our results show (i) collaboration is unnecessary in the absence of computational constraints on clients; (ii) collaboration is necessary if the computational cost on each client is limited to $o(K)$, where $K$ is the number of candidate hypothesis spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T06:32:28Z)
• Scalable Online Exploration via Coverability [45.66375686120087]
  Exploration is a major challenge in reinforcement learning, especially for high-dimensional domains that require function approximation. We introduce a new objective, $L_Coverage, which generalizes previous exploration schemes and supports three fundamental desideratas. $L_Coverage enables the first computationally efficient model-based and model-free algorithms for online (reward-free or reward-driven) reinforcement learning in MDPs with low coverability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T10:14:06Z)
• Benchmarking PtO and PnO Methods in the Predictive Combinatorial Optimization Regime [59.27851754647913]
  Predictive optimization is the precise modeling of many real-world applications, including energy cost-aware scheduling and budget allocation on advertising. We develop a modular framework to benchmark 11 existing PtO/PnO methods on 8 problems, including a new industrial dataset for advertising. Our study shows that PnO approaches are better than PtO on 7 out of 8 benchmarks, but there is no silver bullet found for the specific design choices of PnO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T13:19:34Z)
• Sample-Efficient Multi-Agent RL: An Optimization Perspective [103.35353196535544]
  We study multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) for the general-sum Markov Games (MGs) under the general function approximation. We introduce a novel complexity measure called the Multi-Agent Decoupling Coefficient (MADC) for general-sum MGs. We show that our algorithm provides comparable sublinear regret to the existing works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T01:39:04Z)
• On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring [105.13668993076801]
  A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents. We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T06:46:22Z)
• GPSAF: A Generalized Probabilistic Surrogate-Assisted Framework for Constrained Single- and Multi-objective Optimization [7.8140593450932965]
  This paper proposes a generalized probabilistic surrogate-assisted framework (GPSAF) GPSAF is applicable to a broad category of unconstrained and constrained, single- and multi-objective optimization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T13:22:30Z)
• Inducing Equilibria via Incentives: Simultaneous Design-and-Play Finds Global Optima [114.31577038081026]
  We propose an efficient method that tackles the designer's and agents' problems simultaneously in a single loop. Although the designer does not solve the equilibrium problem repeatedly, it can anticipate the overall influence of the incentives on the agents. We prove that the algorithm converges to the global optima at a sublinear rate for a broad class of games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T06:53:59Z)
• The Best of Many Worlds: Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problems [7.433931244705934]
  We consider a data-driven setting in which the reward and resource consumption of each request are generated using an input model unknown to the decision maker. We design general class of algorithms that attain good performance in various input models without knowing which type of input they are facing. Our algorithms operate in the Lagrangian dual space: they maintain a dual multiplier for each resource that is updated using online mirror descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T18:39:17Z)
• Resource Allocation via Model-Free Deep Learning in Free Space Optical Communications [119.81868223344173]
  The paper investigates the general problem of resource allocation for mitigating channel fading effects in Free Space Optical (FSO) communications. Under this framework, we propose two algorithms that solve FSO resource allocation problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-27T17:38:51Z)
• Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and Beyond [7.433931244705934]
  We introduce the emphregularized online allocation problem, a variant that includes a non-linear regularizer acting on the total resource consumption. In this problem, requests repeatedly arrive over time and, for each request, a decision maker needs to take an action that generates a reward and consumes resources. The objective is to simultaneously maximize additively separable rewards and the value of a non-separable regularizer subject to the resource constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T14:24:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.