A Comprehensive Perspective on Explainable AI across the Machine Learning Workflow

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11529v1
• Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 15:15:25 GMT
• Title: A Comprehensive Perspective on Explainable AI across the Machine Learning Workflow
• Authors: George Paterakis, Andrea Castellani, George Papoutsoglou, Tobias Rodemann, Ioannis Tsamardinos,
• Abstract summary: Holistic Explainable Artificial Intelligence (HXAI) is a user-centric framework that embeds explanation into every stage of the data-analysis workflow.<n>HXAI unifies six components (data, analysis set-up, learning process, model output, model quality, communication channel) into a single taxonomy.<n>A 112-item question bank covers these needs; our survey of contemporary tools highlights critical coverage gaps.
• Score: 1.269939585263915
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence is reshaping science and industry, yet many users still regard its models as opaque "black boxes". Conventional explainable artificial-intelligence methods clarify individual predictions but overlook the upstream decisions and downstream quality checks that determine whether insights can be trusted. In this work, we present Holistic Explainable Artificial Intelligence (HXAI), a user-centric framework that embeds explanation into every stage of the data-analysis workflow and tailors those explanations to users. HXAI unifies six components (data, analysis set-up, learning process, model output, model quality, communication channel) into a single taxonomy and aligns each component with the needs of domain experts, data analysts and data scientists. A 112-item question bank covers these needs; our survey of contemporary tools highlights critical coverage gaps. Grounded in theories of human explanation, principles from human-computer interaction and findings from empirical user studies, HXAI identifies the characteristics that make explanations clear, actionable and cognitively manageable. A comprehensive taxonomy operationalises these insights, reducing terminological ambiguity and enabling rigorous coverage analysis of existing toolchains. We further demonstrate how AI agents that embed large-language models can orchestrate diverse explanation techniques, translating technical artifacts into stakeholder-specific narratives that bridge the gap between AI developers and domain experts. Departing from traditional surveys or perspective articles, this work melds concepts from multiple disciplines, lessons from real-world projects and a critical synthesis of the literature to advance a novel, end-to-end viewpoint on transparency, trustworthiness and responsible AI deployment.

Related papers

• AIGI-Holmes: Towards Explainable and Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection via Multimodal Large Language Models [78.08374249341514]
  The rapid development of AI-generated content (AIGC) has led to the misuse of AI-generated images (AIGI) in spreading misinformation.<n>We introduce a large-scale and comprehensive dataset, Holmes-Set, which includes an instruction-tuning dataset with explanations on whether images are AI-generated.<n>Our work introduces an efficient data annotation method called the Multi-Expert Jury, enhancing data generation through structured MLLM explanations and quality control.<n>In addition, we propose Holmes Pipeline, a meticulously designed three-stage training framework comprising visual expert pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, and direct preference optimization
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T14:26:31Z)
• Mind the XAI Gap: A Human-Centered LLM Framework for Democratizing Explainable AI [3.301842921686179]
  We introduce a framework that ensures transparency and human-centered explanations tailored to the needs of experts and non-experts.<n>Our framework encapsulates in one response explanations understandable by non-experts and technical information to experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T21:41:07Z)
• Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): from inherent explainability to large language models [0.0]
  Explainable AI (XAI) techniques facilitate the explainability or interpretability of machine learning models.<n>This paper details the advancements of explainable AI methods, from inherently interpretable models to modern approaches.<n>We review explainable AI techniques that leverage vision-language model (VLM) frameworks to automate or improve the explainability of other machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T06:16:57Z)
• A Comprehensive Guide to Explainable AI: From Classical Models to LLMs [25.07463077055411]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses the growing need for transparency and interpretability in AI systems.<n>It explores interpretability in traditional models like Decision Trees, Linear Regression, and Support Vector Machines.<n>The book presents practical techniques such as SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, counterfactual explanations, and causal inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-01T13:01:01Z)
• User-centric evaluation of explainability of AI with and for humans: a comprehensive empirical study [5.775094401949666]
  This study is located in the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) It focuses on the results of a user-centered assessment of commonly used eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T12:32:39Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Understanding Generative AI Content with Embedding Models [4.662332573448995]
  We show that deep neural networks (DNNs) implicitly engineer features by transforming their input data into hidden feature vectors called embeddings.<n>We find empirical evidence that there is intrinsic separability between real samples and those generated by artificial intelligence (AI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T22:07:05Z)
• Knowledge Graph Augmented Network Towards Multiview Representation Learning for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [96.53859361560505]
  We propose a knowledge graph augmented network (KGAN) to incorporate external knowledge with explicitly syntactic and contextual information. KGAN captures the sentiment feature representations from multiple perspectives, i.e., context-, syntax- and knowledge-based. Experiments on three popular ABSA benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our KGAN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-13T08:25:53Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning [68.8204255655161]
  We review recent works in the direction to attain Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) In critical situations where it is essential to justify and explain the agent's behaviour, better explainability and interpretability of RL models could help gain scientific insight on the inner workings of what is still considered a black box.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T10:11:42Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.