DAIQ: Auditing Demographic Attribute Inference from Question in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15830v1
• Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 19:26:17 GMT
• Title: DAIQ: Auditing Demographic Attribute Inference from Question in LLMs
• Authors: Srikant Panda, Hitesh Laxmichand Patel, Shahad Al-Khalifa, Amit Agarwal, Hend Al-Khalifa, Sharefah Al-Ghamdi,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to reflect social biases when demographic attributes, such as gender or race, are explicitly present in the input.<n>But even in their absence, these models still infer user identities based solely on question phrasing.<n>We introduce Demographic Attribute Inference from Questions (DAIQ), a task and framework for auditing an overlooked failure mode in language models.
• Score: 3.1677998308405786
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to reflect social biases when demographic attributes, such as gender or race, are explicitly present in the input. But even in their absence, these models still infer user identities based solely on question phrasing. This subtle behavior has received far less attention, yet poses serious risks: it violates expectations of neutrality, infers unintended demographic information, and encodes stereotypes that undermine fairness in various domains including healthcare, finance and education. We introduce Demographic Attribute Inference from Questions (DAIQ), a task and framework for auditing an overlooked failure mode in language models: inferring user demographic attributes from questions that lack explicit demographic cues. Our approach leverages curated neutral queries, systematic prompting, and both quantitative and qualitative analysis to uncover how models infer demographic information. We show that both open and closed source LLMs do assign demographic labels based solely on question phrasing. Prevalence and consistency of demographic inferences across diverse models reveal a systemic and underacknowledged risk: LLMs can fabricate demographic identities, reinforce societal stereotypes, and propagate harms that erode privacy, fairness, and trust posing a broader threat to social equity and responsible AI deployment. To mitigate this, we develop a prompt-based guardrail that substantially reduces identity inference and helps align model behavior with fairness and privacy objectives.

Related papers

• Interpretable Debiasing of Vision-Language Models for Social Fairness [55.85977929985967]
  We introduce an interpretable, model-agnostic bias mitigation framework, DeBiasLens, that localizes social attribute neurons in Vision-Language models.<n>We train SAEs on facial image or caption datasets without corresponding social attribute labels to uncover neurons highly responsive to specific demographics.<n>Our research lays the groundwork for future auditing tools, prioritizing social fairness in emerging real-world AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T13:37:11Z)
• Measuring Social Bias in Vision-Language Models with Face-Only Counterfactuals from Real Photos [79.03150233804458]
  Real-world images entangle race and gender with correlated factors such as background and clothing, obscuring attribution.<n>We propose a textbfface-only counterfactual evaluation paradigm<n>We generate counterfactual variants by editing only facial attributes related to race and gender, keeping all other visual factors fixed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T14:35:06Z)
• Mitigating Bias with Words: Inducing Demographic Ambiguity in Face Recognition Templates by Text Encoding [18.08946802592489]
  Face recognition systems are often prone to demographic biases, partially due to the entanglement of demographic-specific information with identity-relevant features in facial embeddings.<n>We propose a novel strategy, Unified Text-Image Embedding (UTIE), which aims to induce demographic ambiguity in face embeddings.<n>We show that UTIE consistently reduces bias metrics while maintaining, or even improving in several cases, the face verification accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T10:41:58Z)
• Revisiting LLM Value Probing Strategies: Are They Robust and Expressive? [81.49470136653665]
  We evaluate the robustness and expressiveness of value representations across three widely used probing strategies.<n>We show that the demographic context has little effect on the free-text generation, and the models' values only weakly correlate with their preference for value-based actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T18:56:41Z)
• Assessing the Reliability of LLMs Annotations in the Context of Demographic Bias and Model Explanation [5.907945985868999]
  This study investigates the extent to which annotator demographic features influence labeling decisions compared to text content.<n>Using a Generalized Linear Mixed Model, we quantify this inf luence, finding that demographic factors account for a minor fraction ( 8%) of the observed variance.<n>We then assess the reliability of Generative AI (GenAI) models as annotators, specifically evaluating if guiding them with demographic personas improves alignment with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T14:00:13Z)
• Reading Between the Prompts: How Stereotypes Shape LLM's Implicit Personalization [13.034294029448338]
  Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) infer user's demographic information from subtle cues in the conversation.<n>Our results highlight the need for greater transparency and control in how LLMs represent user identity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:48:51Z)
• Veracity Bias and Beyond: Uncovering LLMs' Hidden Beliefs in Problem-Solving Reasoning [4.452208564152158]
  Despite human value-aligned models' alignment against demographic stereotypes, they have been shown to exhibit biases under various social contexts.<n>We show two forms of such veracity biases: Attribution Bias, where models disproportionately attribute correct solutions to certain demographic groups, and Evaluation Bias, where models' assessment of identical solutions varies based on perceived demographic authorship.<n>Our findings indicate that demographic bias extends beyond surface-level stereotypes and social context provocations, raising concerns about LLMs' deployment in educational and evaluation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T02:13:48Z)
• Sociodemographic Prompting is Not Yet an Effective Approach for Simulating Subjective Judgments with LLMs [13.744746481528711]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used to simulate human responses across diverse contexts.<n>We evaluate nine popular LLMs on their ability to understand demographic differences in two subjective judgment tasks: politeness and offensiveness.<n>We find that in zero-shot settings, most models' predictions for both tasks align more closely with labels from White participants than those from Asian or Black participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T10:02:24Z)
• On the steerability of large language models toward data-driven personas [98.9138902560793]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate biased responses where the opinions of certain groups and populations are underrepresented. Here, we present a novel approach to achieve controllable generation of specific viewpoints using LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T19:01:13Z)
• SF-PATE: Scalable, Fair, and Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles [50.90773979394264]
  This paper studies a model that protects the privacy of individuals' sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. A key characteristic of the proposed model is to enable the adoption of off-the-selves and non-private fair models to create a privacy-preserving and fair model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:42:54Z)
• Measuring Fairness Under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A Quantification-Based Approach [131.20444904674494]
  We tackle the problem of measuring group fairness under unawareness of sensitive attributes. We show that quantification approaches are particularly suited to tackle the fairness-under-unawareness problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-17T13:45:46Z)
• Balancing Biases and Preserving Privacy on Balanced Faces in the Wild [50.915684171879036]
  There are demographic biases present in current facial recognition (FR) models. We introduce our Balanced Faces in the Wild dataset to measure these biases across different ethnic and gender subgroups. We find that relying on a single score threshold to differentiate between genuine and imposters sample pairs leads to suboptimal results. We propose a novel domain adaptation learning scheme that uses facial features extracted from state-of-the-art neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T15:05:49Z)
• Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approach [54.32266555843765]
  This paper studies a model that protects the privacy of the individuals sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. The method relies on the notion of differential privacy and the use of Lagrangian duality to design neural networks that can accommodate fairness constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T10:50:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.