Cyber Physical Awareness via Intent-Driven Threat Assessment: Enhanced Space Networks with Intershell Links

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16314v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 11:51:32 GMT
• Title: Cyber Physical Awareness via Intent-Driven Threat Assessment: Enhanced Space Networks with Intershell Links
• Authors: Selen Gecgel Cetin, Tolga Ovatman, Gunes Karabulut Kurt,
• Abstract summary: We propose a holistic framework for cyber physical awareness (CPA) in space networks.<n>We suggest an algorithm that extracts characteristic properties of the received signal to facilitate an intuitive understanding of potential threats.<n>We propose an adaptable threat assessment that aligns with varying security and reliability requirements.
• Score: 4.596949537311418
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This letter addresses essential aspects of threat assessment by proposing intent-driven threat models that incorporate both capabilities and intents. We propose a holistic framework for cyber physical awareness (CPA) in space networks, pointing out that analyzing reliability and security separately can lead to overfitting on system-specific criteria. We structure our proposed framework in three main steps. First, we suggest an algorithm that extracts characteristic properties of the received signal to facilitate an intuitive understanding of potential threats. Second, we develop a multitask learning architecture where one task evaluates reliability-related capabilities while the other deciphers the underlying intentions of the signal. Finally, we propose an adaptable threat assessment that aligns with varying security and reliability requirements. The proposed framework enhances the robustness of threat detection and assessment, outperforming conventional sequential methods, and enables space networks with emerging intershell links to effectively address complex threat scenarios.

Related papers

• Secure Semantic Communications via AI Defenses: Fundamentals, Solutions, and Future Directions [44.71660423560587]
  This survey provides a defense-centered and system-oriented synthesis of security in SemCom via AI defense.<n>We present a structured taxonomy of defense strategies organized by where semantic integrity can be compromised in SemCom systems.<n>We also examine security utility operating envelopes that capture tradeoffs among semantic fidelity, robustness, latency, and energy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T17:28:07Z)
• ORCA -- An Automated Threat Analysis Pipeline for O-RAN Continuous Development [57.61878484176942]
  Open-Radio Access Network (O-RAN) integrates numerous software components in a cloud-like deployment, opening the radio access network to previously unconsidered security threats.<n>Current vulnerability assessment practices often rely on manual, labor-intensive, and subjective investigations, leading to inconsistencies in the threat analysis.<n>We propose an automated pipeline that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) to minimize human intervention and associated biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T07:31:59Z)
• Multi-Agent-Driven Cognitive Secure Communications in Satellite-Terrestrial Networks [58.70163955407538]
  Malicious eavesdroppers pose a serious threat to private information via satellite-terrestrial networks (STNs)<n>We propose a cognitive secure communication framework driven by multiple agents that coordinates spectrum scheduling and protection through real-time sensing.<n>We exploit generative adversarial networks to produce adversarial matrices, and employ learning-aided power control to set real and adversarial signal powers for protection layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T10:30:41Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• How Brittle is Agent Safety? Rethinking Agent Risk under Intent Concealment and Task Complexity [55.441602598245744]
  Current safety evaluations for LLM-driven agents primarily focus on atomic harms, failing to address sophisticated threats where malicious intent is concealed or diluted within complex tasks.<n>We address this gap with a two-dimensional analysis of agent safety brittleness under the pressures of intent concealment and task complexity.<n>Our findings reveal two critical phenomena: safety alignment degrades sharply and predictably as intent becomes obscured, and a "Complexity Paradox" emerges, where agents seem safer on harder tasks only due to capability limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T17:27:27Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities [13.175694396580184]
  Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) AI has emerged with the potential to revolutionize cybersecurity AI.<n>We systematically characterize this field by analyzing 127 publications spanning 2019-July 2025.<n>We show that causal reasoning integration is the most transformative advancement, enabling proactive defense beyond correlation-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T17:33:59Z)
• Bayesian and Multi-Objective Decision Support for Real-Time Cyber-Physical Incident Mitigation [6.852472228194646]
  This research proposes a real-time, adaptive decision-support framework for mitigating cyber incidents in cyber-physical systems.<n>It is developed in response to an increasing reliance on these systems within critical infrastructure and evolving adversarial tactics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-31T09:47:38Z)
• Real-Time Detection of Insider Threats Using Behavioral Analytics and Deep Evidential Clustering [0.0]
  We propose a novel framework for real-time detection of insider threats using behavioral analytics combined with deep evidential clustering.<n>Our system captures and analyzes user activities, applies context-rich behavioral features, and classifies potential threats.<n>We evaluate our framework on benchmark insider threat datasets such as CERT and TWOS, achieving an average detection accuracy of 94.7% and a 38% reduction in false positives compared to traditional clustering methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T11:21:33Z)
• Modeling Interdependent Cybersecurity Threats Using Bayesian Networks: A Case Study on In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems [0.0]
  This paper reviews the application of Bayesian Networks (BNs) in cybersecurity risk modeling.<n>A case study is presented in which a STRIDE-based attack tree for an automotive In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) system is transformed into a BN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-14T01:04:45Z)
• An LLM-based Self-Evolving Security Framework for 6G Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks [49.605335601285496]
  6G space-air-ground integrated networks (SAGINs) offer ubiquitous coverage for various mobile applications.<n>We propose a novel security framework for SAGINs based on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our framework produces highly accurate security strategies that remain robust against a variety of unknown attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T04:14:13Z)
• VulRG: Multi-Level Explainable Vulnerability Patch Ranking for Complex Systems Using Graphs [20.407534993667607]
  This work introduces a graph-based framework for vulnerability patch prioritization.<n>It integrates diverse data sources and metrics into a universally applicable model.<n> refined risk metrics enable detailed assessments at the component, asset, and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T14:21:52Z)
• Threat-Informed Cyber Resilience Index: A Probabilistic Quantitative Approach to Measure Defence Effectiveness Against Cyber Attacks [0.36832029288386137]
  This paper introduces the Cyber Resilience Index (CRI), a threat-informed probabilistic approach to quantifying an organisation's defence effectiveness against cyber-attacks (campaigns) Building upon the Threat-Intelligence Based Security Assessment (TIBSA) methodology, we present a mathematical model that translates complex threat intelligence into an actionable, unified metric similar to a stock market index, that executives can understand and interact with while teams can act upon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T17:51:48Z)
• Generative AI for Secure Physical Layer Communications: A Survey [80.0638227807621]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) stands at the forefront of AI innovation, demonstrating rapid advancement and unparalleled proficiency in generating diverse content. In this paper, we offer an extensive survey on the various applications of GAI in enhancing security within the physical layer of communication networks. We delve into the roles of GAI in addressing challenges of physical layer security, focusing on communication confidentiality, authentication, availability, resilience, and integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T06:22:41Z)
• Mutual-modality Adversarial Attack with Semantic Perturbation [81.66172089175346]
  We propose a novel approach that generates adversarial attacks in a mutual-modality optimization scheme. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art attack methods and can be readily deployed as a plug-and-play solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T05:06:01Z)
• ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models [65.79770974145983]
  ASSERT, Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming, consists of three methods -- semantically aligned augmentation, target bootstrapping, and adversarial knowledge injection. We partition our prompts into four safety domains for a fine-grained analysis of how the domain affects model performance. We find statistically significant performance differences of up to 11% in absolute classification accuracy among semantically related scenarios and error rates of up to 19% absolute error in zero-shot adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T17:10:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.