QUINTA: Reflexive Sensibility For Responsible AI Research and Data-Driven Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16347v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:40:30 GMT
• Title: QUINTA: Reflexive Sensibility For Responsible AI Research and Data-Driven Processes
• Authors: Alicia E. Boyd,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a comprehensive framework grounded in critical reflexivity as intersectional praxis.<n>The framework centers researcher reflexivity to call attention to the AI researchers' power in creating and analyzing AI/DS artifacts through data-centric approaches.
• Score: 2.504366738288215
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) continues to prioritize fairness and the concern for historically marginalized communities, the importance of intersectionality in AI research has gained significant recognition. However, few studies provide practical guidance on how researchers can effectively incorporate intersectionality into critical praxis. In response, this paper presents a comprehensive framework grounded in critical reflexivity as intersectional praxis. Operationalizing intersectionality within the AI/DS (Artificial Intelligence/Data Science) pipeline, Quantitative Intersectional Data (QUINTA) is introduced as a methodological paradigm that challenges conventional and superficial research habits, particularly in data-centric processes, to identify and mitigate negative impacts such as the inadvertent marginalization caused by these practices. The framework centers researcher reflexivity to call attention to the AI researchers' power in creating and analyzing AI/DS artifacts through data-centric approaches. To illustrate the effectiveness of QUINTA, we provide a reflexive AI/DS researcher demonstration utilizing the \#metoo movement as a case study. Note: This paper was accepted as a poster presentation at Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) Conference in 2023.

Related papers

• Opting Out of Generative AI: a Behavioral Experiment on the Role of Education in Perplexity AI Avoidance [0.0]
  This study investigates whether differences in formal education are associated with CAI avoidance.<n>Findings underscore education's central role in shaping AI adoption and the role of self-selection biases in AI-related research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T16:05:11Z)
• Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research [2.2665233748698355]
  We present a community-centric study drawing on 284 survey responses and 15 semi-structured interviews with social scientists.<n>We find that the use of AI in research settings has increased significantly among social scientists in step with the widespread popularity of generative AI (genAI)<n>Ethical concerns, particularly around automation bias, deskilling, research misconduct, complex interpretability, and representational harm, are raised in relation to genAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T19:55:36Z)
• The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
  We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z)
• Diversity and Inclusion in AI: Insights from a Survey of AI/ML Practitioners [4.761639988815896]
  Growing awareness of social biases and inequalities embedded in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems has brought increased attention to the integration of Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) principles throughout the AI lifecycle.<n>Despite the rise of ethical AI guidelines, there is limited empirical evidence on how D&I is applied in real-world settings.<n>This study explores how AI and Machine Learning(ML) practitioners perceive and implement D&I principles and identifies organisational challenges that hinder their effective adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T05:40:23Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Analyzing Character and Consciousness in AI-Generated Social Content: A Case Study of Chirper, the AI Social Network [0.0]
  The study embarks on a comprehensive exploration of AI behavior, analyzing the effects of diverse settings on Chirper's responses. Through a series of cognitive tests, the study gauges the self-awareness and pattern recognition prowess of Chirpers. An intriguing aspect of the research is the exploration of the potential influence of a Chirper's handle or personality type on its performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T15:40:18Z)
• Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness [55.037030060643126]
  Intersectionality is a critical framework that allows us to examine how social inequalities persist. We argue that adopting intersectionality as an analytical framework is pivotal to effectively operationalizing fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T21:02:09Z)
• A toolkit of dilemmas: Beyond debiasing and fairness formulas for responsible AI/ML [0.0]
  Approaches to fair and ethical AI have recently fallen under the scrutiny of the emerging field of critical data studies. This paper advocates for a situated reasoning and creative engagement with the dilemmas surrounding responsible algorithmic/data-driven systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T13:58:24Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Towards Unbiased Visual Emotion Recognition via Causal Intervention [63.74095927462]
  We propose a novel Emotion Recognition Network (IERN) to alleviate the negative effects brought by the dataset bias. A series of designed tests validate the effectiveness of IERN, and experiments on three emotion benchmarks demonstrate that IERN outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T10:40:59Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.