Quantum Abduction: A New Paradigm for Reasoning under Uncertainty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16958v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 07:41:49 GMT
• Title: Quantum Abduction: A New Paradigm for Reasoning under Uncertainty
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces quantum abduction, a paradigm that models hypotheses in superposition, allowing them to interfere constructively or destructively.<n>Case studies span historical mysteries, literary demonstrations, medical diagnosis, and scientific theory change.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Abductive reasoning - the search for plausible explanations - has long been central to human inquiry, from forensics to medicine and scientific discovery. Yet formal approaches in AI have largely reduced abduction to eliminative search: hypotheses are treated as mutually exclusive, evaluated against consistency constraints or probability updates, and pruned until a single "best" explanation remains. This reductionist framing overlooks the way human reasoners sustain multiple explanatory lines in suspension, navigate contradictions, and generate novel syntheses. This paper introduces quantum abduction, a non-classical paradigm that models hypotheses in superposition, allows them to interfere constructively or destructively, and collapses only when coherence with evidence is reached. Grounded in quantum cognition and implemented with modern NLP embeddings and generative AI, the framework supports dynamic synthesis rather than premature elimination. Case studies span historical mysteries (Ludwig II of Bavaria, the "Monster of Florence"), literary demonstrations ("Murder on the Orient Express"), medical diagnosis, and scientific theory change. Across these domains, quantum abduction proves more faithful to the constructive and multifaceted nature of human reasoning, while offering a pathway toward expressive and transparent AI reasoning systems.

Related papers

• Abduction Without a Body? Representational Grounding and the Abduction Loop for Scientific Hypothesis Generation [0.0]
  Recent arguments in AI and philosophy of science hold that genuine hypothesis generation requires an agent continuously coupled to the physical world.<n>We defend a narrower claim: online embodiment is not necessary for every abductive scientific act.<n>Our focus is identity abduction: the inference that two independently developed structures are one object under an explicit correspondence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T17:05:31Z)
• OMNIFLOW: A Physics-Grounded Multimodal Agent for Generalized Scientific Reasoning [51.33849811496781]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional logical reasoning capabilities but frequently struggle with the continuous dynamics by Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)<n>We propose OMNIFLOW, a multimodal-symbolic architecture designed to ground frozen LLMs in fundamental physical laws without requiring domain-specific parameter updates.<n>We evaluate it on a benchmark spanning microscopic turbulence, theoretical Navier-Stokes, and macroscopic global weather forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T18:29:01Z)
• Beyond the Einstein-Bohr Debate: Cognitive Complementarity and the Emergence of Quantum Intuition [0.0]
  Recent high-precision experimental confirmations of quantum complementarity have revitalized foundational debates about measurement, description, and realism.<n>This article argues that complementarity is most productively interpreted as an epistemic principle--constraining what can be simultaneously accessed and represented.<n>We introduce cognitive complementarity as a structural principle governing reasoning under non-classical uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T10:13:29Z)
• Analyzing Reasoning Consistency in Large Multimodal Models under Cross-Modal Conflicts [74.47786985522762]
  We identify a critical failure mode termed textual inertia, where models tend to blindly adhere to the erroneous text while neglecting conflicting visual evidence.<n>We propose the LogicGraph Perturbation Protocol that structurally injects perturbations into the reasoning chains of diverse LMMs.<n>Results reveal that models successfully self-correct in less than 10% of cases and predominantly succumb to blind textual error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T16:39:34Z)
• Exploring Syntropic Frameworks in AI Alignment: A Philosophical Investigation [0.0]
  I argue that AI alignment should be reconceived as architecting syntropic, reasons-responsive agents through process-based, multi-agent, developmental mechanisms.<n>I articulate the specification trap'' argument demonstrating why content-based value specification appears structurally unstable.<n>I propose syntropy as an information-theoretic framework for understanding multi-agent alignment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T23:31:29Z)
• Unifying Deductive and Abductive Reasoning in Knowledge Graphs with Masked Diffusion Model [64.31242163019242]
  Deductive and abductive reasoning are critical paradigms for analyzing knowledge graphs.<n>We propose a unified framework for Deductive and Abductive Reasoning in Knowledge graphs, called DARK.<n>We show that DARK achieves state-of-the-art performance on both deductive and abductive reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T14:34:57Z)
• A Survey on Latent Reasoning [100.54120559169735]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities.<n>CoT reasoning that verbalizes intermediate steps limits the model's expressive bandwidth.<n>Latent reasoning tackles this bottleneck by performing multi-step inference entirely in the model's continuous hidden state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T17:29:07Z)
• The Metaphysics of Protection: Emergence, Agency, and the Ontological Status of Logical Qubits [0.0]
  We argue that the practice of fault-tolerant quantum computation offers a profoundly new lens through which to examine foundational questions.<n>We argue that the logical qubit presents a unique case study in the metaphysics of identity, functioning as a quantifiable "Ship of Theseus" in Hilbert space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T00:06:18Z)
• Controllable Logical Hypothesis Generation for Abductive Reasoning in Knowledge Graphs [54.596180382762036]
  Abductive reasoning in knowledge graphs aims to generate plausible logical hypotheses from observed entities.<n>Due to a lack of controllability, a single observation may yield numerous plausible but redundant or irrelevant hypotheses.<n>We introduce the task of controllable hypothesis generation to improve the practical utility of abductive reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T09:36:47Z)
• Detection and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models: A Mechanistic Perspective [11.013059864022667]
  Reasoning Hallucinations are logically coherent but factually incorrect reasoning traces.<n>These errors are embedded within structured reasoning, making them more difficult to detect and potentially more harmful.<n>We propose the Reasoning Score, which quantifies the depth of reasoning by measuring the divergence between logits.<n>We also introduce GRPO-R, an enhanced reinforcement learning algorithm that incorporates step-level deep reasoning rewards via potential-based shaping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T09:16:40Z)
• The Quantum Measurement Problem: A Review of Recent Trends [0.0]
  The Measurement Problem has puzzled physicists and philosophers for nearly a century.<n>This paper reviews the current status of the Measurement Problem, distinguishing between what is well understood and what remains unresolved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T16:32:44Z)
• On the significance of Wigner's Friend in contexts beyond quantum foundations [0.0]
  Wigner's Friend highlights a counterintuitive feature that is unique to quantum theory.<n>We argue that the gist of the Wigner's Friend paradox can be reproduced without assuming quantum physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:00:13Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• NELLIE: A Neuro-Symbolic Inference Engine for Grounded, Compositional, and Explainable Reasoning [59.16962123636579]
  This paper proposes a new take on Prolog-based inference engines. We replace handcrafted rules with a combination of neural language modeling, guided generation, and semi dense retrieval. Our implementation, NELLIE, is the first system to demonstrate fully interpretable, end-to-end grounded QA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T00:54:44Z)
• ACRE: Abstract Causal REasoning Beyond Covariation [90.99059920286484]
  We introduce the Abstract Causal REasoning dataset for systematic evaluation of current vision systems in causal induction. Motivated by the stream of research on causal discovery in Blicket experiments, we query a visual reasoning system with the following four types of questions in either an independent scenario or an interventional scenario. We notice that pure neural models tend towards an associative strategy under their chance-level performance, whereas neuro-symbolic combinations struggle in backward-blocking reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.