Small Language Models for Emergency Departments Decision Support: A Benchmark Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04032v1
- Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 04:46:30 GMT
- Title: Small Language Models for Emergency Departments Decision Support: A Benchmark Study
- Authors: Zirui Wang, Jiajun Wu, Braden Teitge, Jessalyn Holodinsky, Steve Drew,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular in medical domains to assist physicians with a variety of clinical and operational tasks.<n>Small language models (SLMs) offer significant potential due to their inherent reasoning capability and efficient performance.<n>This enables SLMs to support physicians by providing timely and accurate information synthesis, thereby improving clinical decision-making and workflow efficiency.
- Score: 26.333059604118414
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular in medical domains to assist physicians with a variety of clinical and operational tasks. Given the fast-paced and high-stakes environment of emergency departments (EDs), small language models (SLMs), characterized by a reduction in parameter count compared to LLMs, offer significant potential due to their inherent reasoning capability and efficient performance. This enables SLMs to support physicians by providing timely and accurate information synthesis, thereby improving clinical decision-making and workflow efficiency. In this paper, we present a comprehensive benchmark designed to identify SLMs suited for ED decision support, taking into account both specialized medical expertise and broad general problem-solving capabilities. In our evaluations, we focus on SLMs that have been trained on a mixture of general-domain and medical corpora. A key motivation for emphasizing SLMs is the practical hardware limitations, operational cost constraints, and privacy concerns in the typical real-world deployments. Our benchmark datasets include MedMCQA, MedQA-4Options, and PubMedQA, with the medical abstracts dataset emulating tasks aligned with real ED physicians' daily tasks. Experimental results reveal that general-domain SLMs surprisingly outperform their medically fine-tuned counterparts across these diverse benchmarks for ED. This indicates that for ED, specialized medical fine-tuning of the model may not be required.
Related papers
- MAM: Modular Multi-Agent Framework for Multi-Modal Medical Diagnosis via Role-Specialized Collaboration [57.98393950821579]
We introduce the Modular Multi-Agent Framework for Multi-Modal Medical Diagnosis (MAM)<n>Inspired by our empirical findings, MAM decomposes the medical diagnostic process into specialized roles: a General Practitioner, Specialist Team, Radiologist, Medical Assistant, and Director.<n>This modular and collaborative framework enables efficient knowledge updates and leverages existing medical LLMs and knowledge bases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-24T17:52:43Z) - InfiMed: Low-Resource Medical MLLMs with Advancing Understanding and Reasoning [19.791150694039466]
We introduce our InfiMed-Series models, InfiMed-SFT-3B and InfiMed-RL-3B, both of which deliver state-of-the-art performance across seven multimodal medical benchmarks.<n>InfiMed-RL-3B achieves an average accuracy of 59.2%, outperforming even larger models like InternVL3-8B, which achieves 57.3%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T10:31:57Z) - Performance of Large Language Models in Supporting Medical Diagnosis and Treatment [0.0]
AI-driven systems can analyze vast datasets, assisting clinicians in identifying diseases, recommending treatments, and predicting patient outcomes.<n>This study evaluates the performance of a range of contemporary LLMs, including both open-source and closed-source models, on the 2024 Portuguese National Exam for medical specialty access.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-14T16:53:59Z) - Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z) - LLM-MedQA: Enhancing Medical Question Answering through Case Studies in Large Language Models [18.6994780408699]
Large Language Models (LLMs) face significant challenges in medical question answering.<n>We propose a novel approach incorporating similar case generation within a multi-agent medical question-answering system.<n>Our method capitalizes on the model's inherent medical knowledge and reasoning capabilities, eliminating the need for additional training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-31T19:55:45Z) - Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer [50.83806796466396]
Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative class of AI tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare.
This tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T15:41:56Z) - Towards Evaluating and Building Versatile Large Language Models for Medicine [57.49547766838095]
We present MedS-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in clinical contexts.
MedS-Bench spans 11 high-level clinical tasks, including clinical report summarization, treatment recommendations, diagnosis, named entity recognition, and medical concept explanation.
MedS-Ins comprises 58 medically oriented language corpora, totaling 13.5 million samples across 122 tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T17:01:34Z) - AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs.
This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios.
We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z) - MedLM: Exploring Language Models for Medical Question Answering Systems [2.84801080855027]
Large Language Models (LLMs) with their advanced generative capabilities have shown promise in various NLP tasks.
This study aims to compare the performance of general and medical-specific distilled LMs for medical Q&A.
The findings will provide valuable insights into the suitability of different LMs for specific applications in the medical domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-21T03:37:47Z) - Large Language Models Illuminate a Progressive Pathway to Artificial
Healthcare Assistant: A Review [16.008511195589925]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in mimicking human-level language comprehension and reasoning.
This paper provides a comprehensive review on the applications and implications of LLMs in medicine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T13:51:36Z) - An Automatic Evaluation Framework for Multi-turn Medical Consultations
Capabilities of Large Language Models [22.409334091186995]
Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucinations, leading to overly confident but incorrect judgments.
This paper introduces an automated evaluation framework that assesses the practical capabilities of LLMs as virtual doctors during multi-turn consultations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-05T09:24:48Z) - SPeC: A Soft Prompt-Based Calibration on Performance Variability of
Large Language Model in Clinical Notes Summarization [50.01382938451978]
We introduce a model-agnostic pipeline that employs soft prompts to diminish variance while preserving the advantages of prompt-based summarization.
Experimental findings indicate that our method not only bolsters performance but also effectively curbs variance for various language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-23T04:47:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.