Benefits and Limitations of Communication in Multi-Agent Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13903v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 20:04:27 GMT
• Title: Benefits and Limitations of Communication in Multi-Agent Reasoning
• Authors: Michael Rizvi-Martel, Satwik Bhattamishra, Neil Rathi, Guillaume Rabusseau, Michael Hahn,
• Abstract summary: We propose a theoretical framework to analyze the expressivity of multi-agent systems.<n>We derive bounds on (i) the number of agents required to solve the task exactly, (ii) the quantity and structure of inter-agent communication, and (iii) the achievable speedups as problem size and context scale.<n>Our results identify regimes where communication is provably beneficial, delineate tradeoffs between agent count and bandwidth, and expose intrinsic limitations when either resource is constrained.
• Score: 11.788489289062312
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Chain-of-thought prompting has popularized step-by-step reasoning in large language models, yet model performance still degrades as problem complexity and context length grow. By decomposing difficult tasks with long contexts into shorter, manageable ones, recent multi-agent paradigms offer a promising near-term solution to this problem. However, the fundamental capacities of such systems are poorly understood. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework to analyze the expressivity of multi-agent systems. We apply our framework to three algorithmic families: state tracking, recall, and $k$-hop reasoning. We derive bounds on (i) the number of agents required to solve the task exactly, (ii) the quantity and structure of inter-agent communication, and (iii) the achievable speedups as problem size and context scale. Our results identify regimes where communication is provably beneficial, delineate tradeoffs between agent count and bandwidth, and expose intrinsic limitations when either resource is constrained. We complement our theoretical analysis with a set of experiments on pretrained LLMs using controlled synthetic benchmarks. Empirical outcomes confirm the tradeoffs between key quantities predicted by our theory. Collectively, our analysis offers principled guidance for designing scalable multi-agent reasoning systems.

Related papers

• Adaptive Multi-Agent Reasoning for Text-to-Video Retrieval [12.701443847087164]
  We propose an adaptive multi-agent retrieval framework that orchestrates specialized agents over multiple reasoning iterations.<n>Our framework achieves a twofold improvement over CLIP4Clip and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T09:52:51Z)
• COMPASS: Enhancing Agent Long-Horizon Reasoning with Evolving Context [17.575806280348797]
  Small errors compound across steps, and even state-of-the-art models often hallucinate or lose coherence.<n>We propose a lightweight hierarchical framework that separates tactical execution, strategic oversight, and context organization into three specialized components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T20:14:26Z)
• Reasoning-Aware Prompt Orchestration: A Foundation Model for Multi-Agent Language Model Coordination [0.0]
  We present a theoretically-grounded framework for dynamic prompt orchestration that enhances reasoning across multiple specialized agents.<n>This framework addresses three core challenges: logical consistency preservation during agent transitions, reasoning-aware prompt adaptation, and scalable coordination of distributed inference.<n> Experimental results on 1,000 synthetic multi-agent conversations demonstrate a 42% reduction in reasoning latency, a 23% improvement in logical consistency measured by ROUGE-L score, and an 89% success rate for task completion without context loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T22:33:01Z)
• Unifying Language Agent Algorithms with Graph-based Orchestration Engine for Reproducible Agent Research [32.92036657863354]
  Language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding, reasoning, and executing complex tasks.<n>However, developing robust agents presents significant challenges: substantial engineering overhead, lack of standardized components, and insufficient evaluation frameworks for fair comparison.<n>We introduce Agent Graph-based Orchestration for Reasoning and Assessment (AGORA), a flexible and abstraction framework that addresses these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T08:46:23Z)
• PixelThink: Towards Efficient Chain-of-Pixel Reasoning [70.32510083790069]
  PixelThink is a simple yet effective scheme that integrates externally estimated task difficulty and internally measured model uncertainty.<n>It learns to compress reasoning length in accordance with scene complexity and predictive confidence.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach improves both reasoning efficiency and overall segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:55:49Z)
• RBF++: Quantifying and Optimizing Reasoning Boundaries across Measurable and Unmeasurable Capabilities for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [60.84707424369494]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has proven effective in enhancing large language models (LLMs) on complex tasks.<n>We introduce the Reasoning Boundary Framework++ (RBF++), a framework for evaluating and optimizing measurable boundaries of CoT capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T16:25:55Z)
• Why Reasoning Matters? A Survey of Advancements in Multimodal Reasoning (v1) [66.51642638034822]
  Reasoning is central to human intelligence, enabling structured problem-solving across diverse tasks.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced their reasoning abilities in arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic domains.<n>This paper offers a concise yet insightful overview of reasoning techniques in both textual and multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T04:04:56Z)
• Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation [49.27250832754313]
  We present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework. At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence. We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T02:20:06Z)
• Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
  We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks. We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z)
• Task-Oriented Communication Design at Scale [26.297026173363165]
  This paper presents a novel approach for designing scalable task-oriented quantization and communications in cooperative multi-agent systems. The proposed approach utilizes the TOCD framework and the value of information (VoI) concept to enable efficient communication of quantized observations. Numerical results show striking improvements in reducing the computational complexity of obtaining VoI needed for the TOCD in a MAS problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T09:32:42Z)
• On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring [105.13668993076801]
  A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents. We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T06:46:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.