Design Stability in Adaptive Experiments: Implications for Treatment Effect Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22351v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 16:30:26 GMT
• Title: Design Stability in Adaptive Experiments: Implications for Treatment Effect Estimation
• Authors: Saikat Sengupta, Koulik Khamaru, Suvrojit Ghosh, Tirthankar Dasgupta,
• Abstract summary: We study the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) under sequentially adaptive treatment assignment mechanisms.<n>In contrast to classical completely randomized designs, we consider a setting in which the probability of assigning treatment to each experimental unit may depend on prior assignments and observed outcomes.<n>We propose and analyze two natural estimators for the ATE: the inverse propensity weighted (IPW) estimator and an augmented IPW (AIPW) estimator.
• Score: 4.2756749973231924
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We study the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) under sequentially adaptive treatment assignment mechanisms. In contrast to classical completely randomized designs, we consider a setting in which the probability of assigning treatment to each experimental unit may depend on prior assignments and observed outcomes. Within the potential outcomes framework, we propose and analyze two natural estimators for the ATE: the inverse propensity weighted (IPW) estimator and an augmented IPW (AIPW) estimator. The cornerstone of our analysis is the concept of design stability, which requires that as the number of units grows, either the assignment probabilities converge, or sample averages of the inverse propensity scores and of the inverse complement propensity scores converge in probability to fixed, non-random limits. Our main results establish central limit theorems for both the IPW and AIPW estimators under design stability and provide explicit expressions for their asymptotic variances. We further propose estimators for these variances, enabling the construction of asymptotically valid confidence intervals. Finally, we illustrate our theoretical results in the context of Wei's adaptive coin design and Efron's biased coin design, highlighting the applicability of the proposed methods to sequential experimentation with adaptive randomization.

Related papers

• Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization: Minimum-Variance Two-Point Estimators and Directionally Aligned Perturbations [57.179679246370114]
  We identify the distribution of random perturbations that minimizes the estimator's variance as the perturbation stepsize tends to zero.<n>Our findings reveal that such desired perturbations can align directionally with the true gradient, instead of maintaining a fixed length.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T19:06:39Z)
• On the Optimal Construction of Unbiased Gradient Estimators for Zeroth-Order Optimization [57.179679246370114]
  A potential limitation of existing methods is the bias inherent in most perturbation estimators unless a stepsize is proposed.<n>We propose a novel family of unbiased gradient scaling estimators that eliminate bias while maintaining favorable construction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T18:25:43Z)
• A Generative Framework for Causal Estimation via Importance-Weighted Diffusion Distillation [55.53426007439564]
  Estimating individualized treatment effects from observational data is a central challenge in causal inference.<n>In inverse probability weighting (IPW) is a well-established solution to this problem, but its integration into modern deep learning frameworks remains limited.<n>We propose Importance-Weighted Diffusion Distillation (IWDD), a novel generative framework that combines the pretraining of diffusion models with importance-weighted score distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T17:00:52Z)
• High Precision Causal Model Evaluation with Conditional Randomization [10.23470075454725]
  We introduce a novel low-variance estimator for causal error, dubbed as the pairs estimator. By applying the same IPW estimator to both the model and true experimental effects, our estimator effectively cancels out the variance due to IPW and achieves a smaller variance. Our method offers a simple yet powerful solution to evaluate causal inference models in conditional randomization settings without complicated modification of the IPW estimator itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T13:22:27Z)
• Scalable method for Bayesian experimental design without integrating over posterior distribution [0.0]
  We address the computational efficiency in solving the A-optimal Bayesian design of experiments problems. A-optimality is a widely used and easy-to-interpret criterion for Bayesian experimental design. This study presents a novel likelihood-free approach to the A-optimal experimental design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-30T12:40:43Z)
• Statistically Efficient Bayesian Sequential Experiment Design via Reinforcement Learning with Cross-Entropy Estimators [15.461927416747582]
  Reinforcement learning can learn amortised design policies for designing sequences of experiments. We propose the use of an alternative estimator based on the cross-entropy of the joint model distribution and a flexible proposal distribution. Our method overcomes the exponential-sample complexity of previous approaches and provide more accurate estimates of high EIG values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T00:35:52Z)
• Distributional Gradient Boosting Machines [77.34726150561087]
  Our framework is based on XGBoost and LightGBM. We show that our framework achieves state-of-the-art forecast accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-02T06:32:19Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)
• Nonparametric Score Estimators [49.42469547970041]
  Estimating the score from a set of samples generated by an unknown distribution is a fundamental task in inference and learning of probabilistic models. We provide a unifying view of these estimators under the framework of regularized nonparametric regression. We propose score estimators based on iterative regularization that enjoy computational benefits from curl-free kernels and fast convergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T15:01:03Z)
• Efficient Adaptive Experimental Design for Average Treatment Effect Estimation [20.361745967568154]
  We study how to efficiently estimate average treatment effects (ATEs) using adaptive experiments.<n>In adaptive experiments, experimenters sequentially assign treatments to experimental units while updating treatment probabilities based on past data.<n>We develop nonparametric and nonasymptotic confidence intervals that are valid at any round of the proposed design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T02:04:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.