The Cost of Certainty: Shot Budgets in Quantum Program Testing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22418v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 19:34:16 GMT
• Title: The Cost of Certainty: Shot Budgets in Quantum Program Testing
• Abstract summary: This paper develops a unified framework for reasoning about how many measurements are required to verify quantum programs.<n>We analyze the relationship between error probability, fidelity, trace distance, and the quantum Chernoff bound to establish fundamental shot count limits.<n>It provides practical guidance for budgeting measurement shots in quantum program testing, helping practitioners balance rigour against cost when designing verification strategies.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As quantum computing advances toward early fault-tolerant machines, testing and verification of quantum programs become urgent but costly, since each execution consumes scarce hardware resources. Unlike in classical software testing, every measurement must be carefully budgeted. This paper develops a unified framework for reasoning about how many measurements are required to verify quantum programs. The goal is to connect theoretical error bounds with concrete test strategies and to extend the analysis from individual tests to full program-level verification. We analyze the relationship between error probability, fidelity, trace distance, and the quantum Chernoff bound to establish fundamental shot count limits. These foundations are applied to three representative testing methods: the inverse test, the swap test, and the chi-square test. Both idealized and noisy devices are considered. We also introduce a program-level budgeting approach that allocates verification effort across multiple subroutines. The inverse test is the most measurement efficient, the swap test requires about twice as many shots, and the chi-square test is easiest to implement but often needs orders of magnitude more measurements. In the presence of noise, calibrated baselines may increase measurement requirements beyond theoretical estimates. At the program level, distributing a global fidelity target across many fine-grained functions can cause verification costs to grow rapidly, whereas coarser decompositions or weighted allocations remain more practical. The framework clarifies trade-offs among different testing strategies, noise handling, and program decomposition. It provides practical guidance for budgeting measurement shots in quantum program testing, helping practitioners balance rigour against cost when designing verification strategies.

Related papers

• Bayesian control for coding agents [63.64172141184361]
  We propose a cost-sensitive sequential hypothesis testing framework for coding agents.<n>A Bayesian controller maintains a belief over correctness and decides whether to gather more evidence, refine the candidate, verify it, or stop.<n>We show that the belief state yields an interpretable correctness score that outperforms token-probability and raw tool-success baselines for uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T11:41:32Z)
• Bayesian Sequential Verification for Budget-Aware Quantum Program Testing [5.589961715298686]
  This paper formulates Bayesian sequential verification as a reference-based hypothesis testing workflow.<n>It is evaluated in Qiskit on two complementary workloads: Bell-state and QAOA-MaxCut.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T04:21:08Z)
• Efficient and Practical Black-Box Verification of Quantum Metric Learning Algorithms [8.202137984876366]
  Quantum metric learning enhances machine learning by mapping classical data to a quantum Hilbert space with maximal separation between classes.<n>On current NISQ hardware, this mapping process itself is prone to errors and could be fundamentally incorrect.<n>We propose a practical black-box verification protocol to audit the performance of quantum metric learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T17:07:43Z)
• Scaling Agentic Verifier for Competitive Coding [66.11758166379092]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong coding capabilities but still struggle to solve competitive programming problems correctly in a single attempt.<n>Execution-based re-ranking offers a promising test-time scaling strategy, yet existing methods are constrained by either difficult test case generation or inefficient random input sampling.<n>We propose Agentic Verifier, an execution-based agent that actively reasons about program behaviors and searches for highly discriminative test inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T06:30:40Z)
• QSPE: Enumerating Skeletal Quantum Programs for Quantum Library Testing [11.99653900003681]
  We propose QSPE, a practical approach that follows the differential testing principle and extends the existing approach, SPE, for quantum libraries.<n> QSPE is fully automated, requiring no pre-set configurations or domain expertise, and can effectively generate a large set of diverse program variants.<n>In our experiments, the QSPE approach demonstrates remarkable effectiveness in generating 22,770 program variants across multiple quantum computing platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T08:10:40Z)
• A Posteriori Certification Framework for Generalized Quantum Arimoto-Blahut Algorithms [41.15017547767954]
  We introduce an a posteriori certification viewpoint for the generalized quantum Arimoto-Blahut (QAB) algorithm.<n>We prove a global convergence theorem showing that, under convexity and a substantially weaker numerically verifiable condition, the QAB iteration converges to the global minimizer.<n>As an application, we develop a certified iterative scheme for computing the quantum relative entropy of channels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T09:10:41Z)
• Is Measurement Enough? Rethinking Output Validation in Quantum Program Testing [4.83245022854922]
  Quantum program testing has emerged as a prominent research area within the scope of quantum software engineering.<n>Most existing methods rely on measurement-based validation in practice.<n>Due to the inherently probabilistic nature of quantum programs, measurement-based validation methods face significant limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T09:39:09Z)
• Quantum Sequential Universal Hypothesis Testing [62.751483592497806]
  Quantum hypothesis testing (QHT) concerns the statistical inference of unknown quantum states.<n>We introduce the quantum sequential universal test (QSUT), a novel framework for sequential QHT in the general case of composite hypotheses.<n> QSUT builds on universal inference, and it alternates between adaptive local measurements aimed at exploring the hypothesis space and joint measurements optimized for maximal discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T12:50:04Z)
• On the Feasibility of Quantum Unit Testing [7.96685560797073]
  This work presents a study on quantum-centric unit tests, comparing traditional statistical approaches with tests specifically designed for quantum circuits.<n>We investigate (a) each test's ability to detect subtle discrepancies between the expected and actual states of a quantum circuit, and (b) the number of measurements required to achieve high reliability.<n>The results demonstrate that quantum-centric tests provide clear advantages in terms of precision and efficiency, reducing both false positives and false negatives compared to statistical tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T06:05:24Z)
• Certifying classes of $d$-outcome measurements with quantum steering [49.1574468325115]
  We provide a construction of a family of steering inequalities tailored to large classes of $d$-outcomes projective measurements. We prove that the maximal quantum violation of those inequalities can be used for certification of those measurements and the maximally entangled state of two qudits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T15:32:53Z)
• Bug-locating Method based on Statistical Testing for Quantum Programs [0.0]
  The cost of testing each segment depends on its location. Since a quantum program is tested statistically on the basis of measurement results, there is a tradeoff between testing accuracy and cost. We propose an efficient bug-locating method consisting of four approaches, cost-based binary search, early determination, finalization, and looking back.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T07:14:08Z)
• Robust and efficient verification of graph states in blind measurement-based quantum computation [52.70359447203418]
  Blind quantum computation (BQC) is a secure quantum computation method that protects the privacy of clients. It is crucial to verify whether the resource graph states are accurately prepared in the adversarial scenario. Here, we propose a robust and efficient protocol for verifying arbitrary graph states with any prime local dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T06:24:45Z)
• Quantum Conformal Prediction for Reliable Uncertainty Quantification in Quantum Machine Learning [47.991114317813555]
  Quantum models implement implicit probabilistic predictors that produce multiple random decisions for each input through measurement shots. This paper proposes to leverage such randomness to define prediction sets for both classification and regression that provably capture the uncertainty of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T22:05:21Z)
• Hypothesis Testing for Error Mitigation: How to Evaluate Error Mitigation [0.9405458160620533]
  We introduce hypothesis testing within the framework of quantum error mitigation. We propose an inclusive figure of merit that accounts for both resource requirement and mitigation efficiency. We experimentally evaluate $16$ error mitigation pipelines composed of singular methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-06T19:16:08Z)
• Quantum Goemans-Williamson Algorithm with the Hadamard Test and Approximate Amplitude Constraints [62.72309460291971]
  We introduce a variational quantum algorithm for Goemans-Williamson algorithm that uses only $n+1$ qubits. Efficient optimization is achieved by encoding the objective matrix as a properly parameterized unitary conditioned on an auxilary qubit. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our protocol by devising an efficient quantum implementation of the Goemans-Williamson algorithm for various NP-hard problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T03:15:23Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Re-examining the quantum volume test: Ideal distributions, compiler optimizations, confidence intervals, and scalable resource estimations [0.20999222360659606]
  We explore the quantum volume test to better understand its design aspects, sensitivity to errors, passing criteria, and what passing implies about a quantum computer. We present an efficient algorithm for estimating the expected heavy output probability under different error models and compiler optimization options. We discuss what the quantum volume test implies about a quantum computer's practical or operational abilities especially in terms of quantum error correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T23:05:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.