Bidirectional Bounded-Suboptimal Heuristic Search with Consistent Heuristics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10272v1
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 01:42:37 GMT
- Title: Bidirectional Bounded-Suboptimal Heuristic Search with Consistent Heuristics
- Authors: Shahaf S. Shperberg, Natalie Morad, Lior Siag, Ariel Felner, Dor Atzmon,
- Abstract summary: This paper focuses on bounded-suboptimal bidirectional search, where a bound on the suboptimality of the solution cost is specified.<n>We build upon the state-of-the-art optimal bidirectional search algorithm, BAE*, and introduce several variants of BAE* specifically tailored for the bounded-suboptimal context.
- Score: 7.049213272184215
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent advancements in bidirectional heuristic search have yielded significant theoretical insights and novel algorithms. While most previous work has concentrated on optimal search methods, this paper focuses on bounded-suboptimal bidirectional search, where a bound on the suboptimality of the solution cost is specified. We build upon the state-of-the-art optimal bidirectional search algorithm, BAE*, designed for consistent heuristics, and introduce several variants of BAE* specifically tailored for the bounded-suboptimal context. Through experimental evaluation, we compare the performance of these new variants against other bounded-suboptimal bidirectional algorithms as well as the standard weighted A* algorithm. Our results demonstrate that each algorithm excels under distinct conditions, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.
Related papers
- Multi-objective Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm based on a Grid System [3.893824727358049]
This paper presents a multi-objective version of the Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm called the Grid-based Multi-objective Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm (GMOCSO)<n> Convergence and diversity preservation are the two main goals pursued by modern multi-objective algorithms to yield robust results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-22T09:13:21Z) - Provably Faster Algorithms for Bilevel Optimization via Without-Replacement Sampling [96.47086913559289]
gradient-based algorithms are widely used in bilevel optimization.
We introduce a without-replacement sampling based algorithm which achieves a faster convergence rate.
We validate our algorithms over both synthetic and real-world applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T17:05:31Z) - Dynamic Incremental Optimization for Best Subset Selection [15.8362578568708]
Best subset selection is considered the gold standard for many learning problems.<n>An efficient subset-dual algorithm is developed based on the primal and dual problem structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T02:26:40Z) - Amortized Implicit Differentiation for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization [53.12363770169761]
We study a class of algorithms for solving bilevel optimization problems in both deterministic and deterministic settings.
We exploit a warm-start strategy to amortize the estimation of the exact gradient.
By using this framework, our analysis shows these algorithms to match the computational complexity of methods that have access to an unbiased estimate of the gradient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-29T15:10:09Z) - A novel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition and
multi-reference points strategy [14.102326122777475]
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) has been regarded as a significantly promising approach for solving multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs)
We propose an improved MOEA/D algorithm by virtue of the well-known Pascoletti-Serafini scalarization method and a new strategy of multi-reference points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T02:07:08Z) - Provably Faster Algorithms for Bilevel Optimization [54.83583213812667]
Bilevel optimization has been widely applied in many important machine learning applications.
We propose two new algorithms for bilevel optimization.
We show that both algorithms achieve the complexity of $mathcalO(epsilon-1.5)$, which outperforms all existing algorithms by the order of magnitude.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T21:05:30Z) - Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms for Smooth and Strongly Convex
Decentralized Optimization Over Time-Varying Networks [79.16773494166644]
We consider the task of minimizing the sum of smooth and strongly convex functions stored in a decentralized manner across the nodes of a communication network.
We design two optimal algorithms that attain these lower bounds.
We corroborate the theoretical efficiency of these algorithms by performing an experimental comparison with existing state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T15:54:44Z) - Bi-objective Search with Bi-directional A* [8.140473195463905]
Bi-objective A*-based search (BOA*) has shown state-of-the-art performance in large networks.
This paper develops a bi-directional variant of BOA*, enriched with several speed-ups.
Our experimental results on 1,000 benchmark cases show that our bi-directional A* algorithm for bi-objective search (BOBA*) can optimally solve all of the benchmark cases within the time limit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-25T12:46:25Z) - PAMELI: A Meta-Algorithm for Computationally Expensive Multi-Objective
Optimization Problems [0.0]
The proposed algorithm is based on solving a set of surrogate problems defined by models of the real one.
Our algorithm also performs a meta-search for optimal surrogate models and navigation strategies for the optimization landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-19T11:18:03Z) - Adaptivity of Stochastic Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization [71.03797261151605]
Adaptivity is an important yet under-studied property in modern optimization theory.
Our algorithm is proved to achieve the best-available convergence for non-PL objectives simultaneously while outperforming existing algorithms for PL objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-13T05:42:27Z) - Extreme Algorithm Selection With Dyadic Feature Representation [78.13985819417974]
We propose the setting of extreme algorithm selection (XAS) where we consider fixed sets of thousands of candidate algorithms.
We assess the applicability of state-of-the-art AS techniques to the XAS setting and propose approaches leveraging a dyadic feature representation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-29T09:40:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.