A novel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition and multi-reference points strategy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14124v6
• Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:21:35 GMT
• Title: A novel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition and multi-reference points strategy
• Authors: Wang Chen, Jian Chen, Weitian Wu, Xinmin Yang, Hui Li
• Abstract summary: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) has been regarded as a significantly promising approach for solving multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) We propose an improved MOEA/D algorithm by virtue of the well-known Pascoletti-Serafini scalarization method and a new strategy of multi-reference points.
• Score: 14.102326122777475
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many real-world optimization problems such as engineering design can be eventually modeled as the corresponding multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) which must be solved to obtain approximate Pareto optimal fronts. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) has been regarded as a significantly promising approach for solving MOPs. Recent studies have shown that MOEA/D with uniform weight vectors is well-suited to MOPs with regular Pareto optimal fronts, but its performance in terms of diversity usually deteriorates when solving MOPs with irregular Pareto optimal fronts. In this way, the solution set obtained by the algorithm can not provide more reasonable choices for decision makers. In order to efficiently overcome this drawback, we propose an improved MOEA/D algorithm by virtue of the well-known Pascoletti-Serafini scalarization method and a new strategy of multi-reference points. Specifically, this strategy consists of the setting and adaptation of reference points generated by the techniques of equidistant partition and projection. For performance assessment, the proposed algorithm is compared with existing four state-of-the-art multiobjective evolutionary algorithms on benchmark test problems with various types of Pareto optimal fronts. According to the experimental results, the proposed algorithm exhibits better diversity performance than that of the other compared algorithms. Finally, our algorithm is applied to two real-world MOPs in engineering optimization successfully.

Related papers

• Analyzing and Enhancing the Backward-Pass Convergence of Unrolled Optimization [50.38518771642365]
  The integration of constrained optimization models as components in deep networks has led to promising advances on many specialized learning tasks. A central challenge in this setting is backpropagation through the solution of an optimization problem, which often lacks a closed form. This paper provides theoretical insights into the backward pass of unrolled optimization, showing that it is equivalent to the solution of a linear system by a particular iterative method. A system called Folded Optimization is proposed to construct more efficient backpropagation rules from unrolled solver implementations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T23:15:18Z)
• Linearization Algorithms for Fully Composite Optimization [61.20539085730636]
  This paper studies first-order algorithms for solving fully composite optimization problems convex compact sets. We leverage the structure of the objective by handling differentiable and non-differentiable separately, linearizing only the smooth parts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:41:48Z)
• Backpropagation of Unrolled Solvers with Folded Optimization [55.04219793298687]
  The integration of constrained optimization models as components in deep networks has led to promising advances on many specialized learning tasks. One typical strategy is algorithm unrolling, which relies on automatic differentiation through the operations of an iterative solver. This paper provides theoretical insights into the backward pass of unrolled optimization, leading to a system for generating efficiently solvable analytical models of backpropagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T01:50:42Z)
• An Empirical Evaluation of Zeroth-Order Optimization Methods on AI-driven Molecule Optimization [78.36413169647408]
  We study the effectiveness of various ZO optimization methods for optimizing molecular objectives. We show the advantages of ZO sign-based gradient descent (ZO-signGD) We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of ZO optimization methods on widely used benchmark tasks from the Guacamol suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T01:58:10Z)
• A Simple Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-modal Multi-objective Optimization [0.0]
  We introduce a steady-state evolutionary algorithm for solving multi-modal, multi-objective optimization problems (MMOPs) We report its performance on 21 MMOPs from various test suites that are widely used for benchmarking using a low computational budget of 1000 function evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T03:31:11Z)
• Surrogate-Assisted Reference Vector Adaptation to Various Pareto Front Shapes for Many-Objective Bayesian Optimization [0.0]
  We propose a surrogate-assisted reference vector adaptation (SRVA) method to solve expensive multi- and many-objective optimization problems. The proposed algorithm is compared with two other MBO algorithms by applying them to benchmark problems. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the other two in the problems whose objective functions are reasonably approximated by the Kriging models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T03:05:12Z)
• PAMELI: A Meta-Algorithm for Computationally Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization Problems [0.0]
  The proposed algorithm is based on solving a set of surrogate problems defined by models of the real one. Our algorithm also performs a meta-search for optimal surrogate models and navigation strategies for the optimization landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-19T11:18:03Z)
• Follow the bisector: a simple method for multi-objective optimization [65.83318707752385]
  We consider optimization problems, where multiple differentiable losses have to be minimized. The presented method computes descent direction in every iteration to guarantee equal relative decrease of objective functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T09:50:33Z)
• Decomposition in Decision and Objective Space for Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Optimization [15.681236469530397]
  Multi-modal multi-objective optimization problems (MMMOPs) have multiple subsets within the Pareto-optimal Set. Prevalent multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are not purely designed to search for multiple solution subsets, whereas, algorithms designed for MMMOPs demonstrate degraded performance in the objective space. This motivates the design of better algorithms for addressing MMMOPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T03:18:47Z)
• A Decomposition-based Large-scale Multi-modal Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm [9.584279193016522]
  We propose an efficient multi-modal multi-objective optimization algorithm based on the widely used MOEA/D algorithm. Experimental results show that our proposed algorithm can effectively preserve the diversity of solutions in the decision space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T09:18:54Z)
• Adaptivity of Stochastic Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization [71.03797261151605]
  Adaptivity is an important yet under-studied property in modern optimization theory. Our algorithm is proved to achieve the best-available convergence for non-PL objectives simultaneously while outperforming existing algorithms for PL objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T05:42:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.