Chain of Summaries: Summarization Through Iterative Questioning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15719v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:53:37 GMT
• Title: Chain of Summaries: Summarization Through Iterative Questioning
• Authors: William Brach, Lukas Galke Poech,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly using external web content.<n>Much of this content is not easily digestible by LLMs due to LLM-unfriendly formats and limitations of context length.<n>We propose a method for generating general-purpose, information-dense summaries that act as plain-text repositories of web content.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly using external web content. However, much of this content is not easily digestible by LLMs due to LLM-unfriendly formats and limitations of context length. To address this issue, we propose a method for generating general-purpose, information-dense summaries that act as plain-text repositories of web content. Inspired by Hegel's dialectical method, our approach, denoted as Chain of Summaries (CoS), iteratively refines an initial summary (thesis) by identifying its limitations through questioning (antithesis), leading to a general-purpose summary (synthesis) that can satisfy current and anticipate future information needs. Experiments on the TriviaQA, TruthfulQA, and SQUAD datasets demonstrate that CoS outperforms zero-shot LLM baselines by up to 66% and specialized summarization methods such as BRIO and PEGASUS by up to 27%. CoS-generated summaries yield higher Q&A performance compared to the source content, while requiring substantially fewer tokens and being agnostic to the specific downstream LLM. CoS thus resembles an appealing option for website maintainers to make their content more accessible for LLMs, while retaining possibilities for human oversight.

Related papers

• RAVEL: Reasoning Agents for Validating and Evaluating LLM Text Synthesis [78.32151470154422]
  We introduce RAVEL, an agentic framework that enables the testers to autonomously plan and execute typical synthesis operations.<n>We present C3EBench, a benchmark comprising 1,258 samples derived from professional human writings.<n>By augmenting RAVEL with SOTA LLMs as operators, we find that such agentic text synthesis is dominated by the LLM's reasoning capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T14:47:34Z)
• Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic Searchers [74.17516978246152]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into information retrieval to advance traditional techniques.<n>We propose EXSEARCH, an agentic search framework, where the LLM learns to retrieve useful information as the reasoning unfolds.<n>Experiments on four knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that EXSEARCH substantially outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:27:55Z)
• Unleashing the Power of LLMs in Dense Retrieval with Query Likelihood Modeling [69.84963245729826]
  We propose an auxiliary task of QL to enhance the backbone for subsequent contrastive learning of the retriever.<n>We introduce our model, which incorporates two key components: Attention Block (AB) and Document Corruption (DC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T16:03:59Z)
• LLM-Lasso: A Robust Framework for Domain-Informed Feature Selection and Regularization [59.75242204923353]
  We introduce LLM-Lasso, a framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to guide feature selection in Lasso regression.<n>LLMs generate penalty factors for each feature, which are converted into weights for the Lasso penalty using a simple, tunable model.<n>Features identified as more relevant by the LLM receive lower penalties, increasing their likelihood of being retained in the final model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T02:55:22Z)
• Scaling Up Summarization: Leveraging Large Language Models for Long Text Extractive Summarization [0.27624021966289597]
  This paper introduces EYEGLAXS, a framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for extractive summarization. EYEGLAXS focuses on extractive summarization to ensure factual and grammatical integrity. The system sets new performance benchmarks on well-known datasets like PubMed and ArXiv.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T13:52:19Z)
• LaMSUM: Amplifying Voices Against Harassment through LLM Guided Extractive Summarization of User Incident Reports [6.770555526416268]
  Citizen reporting platforms like Safe City in India help the public and authorities stay informed about sexual harassment incidents.<n>A summarization algorithm capable of processing and understanding various Indian code-mixed languages is essential.<n>We introduce LaMSUM, a novel multi-level framework designed to generate extractive summaries for large collections of Safe City posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T10:25:55Z)
• Refiner: Restructure Retrieval Content Efficiently to Advance Question-Answering Capabilities [30.1331670544648]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are limited by their parametric knowledge, leading to hallucinations in knowledge-extensive tasks. We propose $textitRefiner$, an end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm that operates in the post-retrieval process of RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T09:25:10Z)
• SuRe: Summarizing Retrievals using Answer Candidates for Open-domain QA of LLMs [85.54906813106683]
  We propose a simple yet effective framework to enhance open-domain question answering (ODQA) with large language models (LLMs) SuRe helps LLMs predict more accurate answers for a given question, which are well-supported by the summarized retrieval (SuRe) Experimental results on diverse ODQA benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of SuRe, with improvements of up to 4.6% in exact match (EM) and 4.0% in F1 score over standard prompting approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T01:15:54Z)
• An In-Context Schema Understanding Method for Knowledge Base Question Answering [70.87993081445127]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in language understanding and can be used to solve this task. Existing methods bypass this challenge by initially employing LLMs to generate drafts of logic forms without schema-specific details. We propose a simple In-Context Understanding (ICSU) method that enables LLMs to directly understand schemas by leveraging in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T04:19:17Z)
• On Context Utilization in Summarization with Large Language Models [83.84459732796302]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel in abstractive summarization tasks, delivering fluent and pertinent summaries. Recent advancements have extended their capabilities to handle long-input contexts, exceeding 100k tokens. We conduct the first comprehensive study on context utilization and position bias in summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T16:45:12Z)
• Investigating Answerability of LLMs for Long-Form Question Answering [35.41413072729483]
  We focus on long-form question answering (LFQA) because it has several practical and impactful applications. We propose a question-generation method from abstractive summaries and show that generating follow-up questions from summaries of long documents can create a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T07:22:56Z)
• Element-aware Summarization with Large Language Models: Expert-aligned Evaluation and Chain-of-Thought Method [35.181659789684545]
  Automatic summarization generates concise summaries that contain key ideas of source documents. References from CNN/DailyMail and BBC XSum are noisy, mainly in terms of factual hallucination and information redundancy. We propose a Summary Chain-of-Thought (SumCoT) technique to elicit LLMs to generate summaries step by step. Experimental results show our method outperforms state-of-the-art fine-tuned PLMs and zero-shot LLMs by +4.33/+4.77 in ROUGE-L.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T18:54:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.