Deep Gaussian Process Proximal Policy Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18214v1
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 23:13:04 GMT
- Title: Deep Gaussian Process Proximal Policy Optimization
- Abstract summary: Uncertainty estimation for Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a critical component in control tasks where agents must balance safe exploration and efficient learning.<n>We introduce Deep Gaussian Process Proximal Policy Optimization (GPPO), a scalable, model-free actor-critic algorithm that leverages Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) to approximate both the policy and value function.<n>GPPO maintains competitive performance with respect to Proximal Policy Optimization on standard high-dimensional continuous control benchmarks while providing well-calibrated uncertainty estimates that can inform safer and more effective exploration.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Uncertainty estimation for Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a critical component in control tasks where agents must balance safe exploration and efficient learning. While deep neural networks have enabled breakthroughs in RL, they often lack calibrated uncertainty estimates. We introduce Deep Gaussian Process Proximal Policy Optimization (GPPO), a scalable, model-free actor-critic algorithm that leverages Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) to approximate both the policy and value function. GPPO maintains competitive performance with respect to Proximal Policy Optimization on standard high-dimensional continuous control benchmarks while providing well-calibrated uncertainty estimates that can inform safer and more effective exploration.
Related papers
- Test-Time Gradient Guidance of Flow Policies in Reinforcement Learning [50.738952715864116]
Expressive continuous control policies form the backbone of advances in scaling imitation learning for simulated and real robot control.<n>We propose QGF (Q-Guided Flow), an RL algorithm that performs policy optimization entirely at test time.<n> Empirically, QGF outperforms prior test-time RL methods on single-task and goal-conditioned offline RL benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-09T16:45:57Z) - OGPO: Sample Efficient Full-Finetuning of Generative Control Policies [53.42266064673132]
Generative control policies (GCPs) have emerged as effective parameterizations for robot learning.<n>This work introduces Off-policy Generative Policy Optimization (OGPO), a sample-efficient for finetuning GCPs.<n>OGPO achieves state-of-the-art performance on manipulation tasks spanning multi-task settings, high-precision insertion, and dexterous control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T18:36:40Z) - Robust Regularized Policy Iteration under Transition Uncertainty [6.7431287237221085]
We formulate offline RL as robust policy optimization, treating the transition kernel as a decision variable within an uncertainty set.<n>We propose Robust Regularized Policy Iteration (RRPI), which replaces the intractable max-min bilevel objective with a tractable KL-regularized surrogate.<n>Experiments on D4RL benchmarks demonstrate that RRPI achieves strong average performance, outperforming recent baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T08:18:27Z) - Autonomous UAV Flight Navigation in Confined Spaces: A Reinforcement Learning Approach [0.6533458718563319]
Off-policy methods promise high sample efficiency, a vital trait for minimizing costly and unsafe real-world fine-tuning.<n>On-policy methods often exhibit greater training stability, which is essential for reliable convergence in hazard-dense environments.<n>This work provides evidence that for high-precision, safety-critical navigation tasks, the reliable convergence of a well-established on-policy method can be more decisive than the nominal sample efficiency of an off-policy algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-22T21:29:59Z) - StaQ it! Growing neural networks for Policy Mirror Descent [4.672862669694739]
In Reinforcement Learning (RL), regularization has emerged as a popular tool both in theory and practice.<n>We propose and analyze PMD-like algorithms that only keep the last $M$ Q-functions in memory.<n>We show that for finite and large enough $M$, a convergent algorithm can be derived, introducing no error in the policy update.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T18:00:01Z) - Learning Deterministic Policies with Policy Gradients in Constrained Markov Decision Processes [59.27926064817273]
We introduce an exploration-agnostic algorithm, called C-PG, which enjoys global last-iterate convergence guarantees under domination assumptions.<n>We empirically validate both the action-based (C-PGAE) and parameter-based (C-PGPE) variants of C-PG on constrained control tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T10:29:05Z) - Safe Reinforcement Learning using Finite-Horizon Gradient-based Estimation [25.552241659930445]
Key aspect of Safe Reinforcement Learning (Safe RL) involves estimating the constraint condition for the next policy.<n>Existing estimation methods rely on the infinite-horizon discounted advantage function.<n>We propose the first estimation method for finite-horizon non-discounted constraints in deep Safe RL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-15T10:05:23Z) - Efficient Action Robust Reinforcement Learning with Probabilistic Policy
Execution Uncertainty [43.55450683502937]
In this paper, we focus on action robust RL with the probabilistic policy execution uncertainty.
We establish the existence of an optimal policy on the action robust MDPs with probabilistic policy execution uncertainty.
We also develop Action Robust Reinforcement Learning with Certificates (ARRLC) algorithm that minimax optimal regret and sample complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-15T00:26:51Z) - Policy Mirror Descent for Regularized Reinforcement Learning: A
Generalized Framework with Linear Convergence [60.20076757208645]
This paper proposes a general policy mirror descent (GPMD) algorithm for solving regularized RL.
We demonstrate that our algorithm converges linearly over an entire range learning rates, in a dimension-free fashion, to the global solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-24T02:21:34Z) - Risk-Sensitive Deep RL: Variance-Constrained Actor-Critic Provably Finds
Globally Optimal Policy [95.98698822755227]
We make the first attempt to study risk-sensitive deep reinforcement learning under the average reward setting with the variance risk criteria.
We propose an actor-critic algorithm that iteratively and efficiently updates the policy, the Lagrange multiplier, and the Fenchel dual variable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-28T05:02:26Z) - Provably Good Batch Reinforcement Learning Without Great Exploration [51.51462608429621]
Batch reinforcement learning (RL) is important to apply RL algorithms to many high stakes tasks.
Recent algorithms have shown promise but can still be overly optimistic in their expected outcomes.
We show that a small modification to Bellman optimality and evaluation back-up to take a more conservative update can have much stronger guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T09:25:54Z) - Guided Constrained Policy Optimization for Dynamic Quadrupedal Robot
Locomotion [78.46388769788405]
We introduce guided constrained policy optimization (GCPO), an RL framework based upon our implementation of constrained policy optimization (CPPO)
We show that guided constrained RL offers faster convergence close to the desired optimum resulting in an optimal, yet physically feasible, robotic control behavior without the need for precise reward function tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-22T10:15:53Z) - Kalman meets Bellman: Improving Policy Evaluation through Value Tracking [59.691919635037216]
Policy evaluation is a key process in Reinforcement Learning (RL)
We devise an optimization method, called Kalman Optimization for Value Approximation (KOVA)
KOVA minimizes a regularized objective function that concerns both parameter and noisy return uncertainties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-17T13:30:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.