The relationship between offline partisan geographical segregation and online partisan segregation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07121v2
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 02:41:59 GMT
- Title: The relationship between offline partisan geographical segregation and online partisan segregation
- Authors: Megan A. Brown, Tiago Ventura, Joshua A. Tucker, Jonathan Nagler,
- Abstract summary: We link voters' offline partisan segregation extracted from publicly available voter files for 180 million US voters with their online network segregation on Twitter.<n>Our results show that while social media users tend to form politically homogeneous online networks, these levels of partisan sorting are significantly lower than those found in offline settings.<n>Democrats are more isolated than Republicans in both settings, and only older Republicans exhibit higher online than offline segregation.
- Score: 0.7116403133334644
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Social media is often blamed for the creation of echo chambers. However, these claims fail to consider the prevalence of offline echo chambers resulting from high levels of partisan segregation in the United States. Our article empirically assesses these online versus offline dynamics by linking a novel dataset of voters' offline partisan segregation extracted from publicly available voter files for 180 million US voters with their online network segregation on Twitter. We investigate offline and online partisan segregation using measures of geographical and network isolation of every matched voter-twitter user to their co-partisans online and offline. Our results show that while social media users tend to form politically homogeneous online networks, these levels of partisan sorting are significantly lower than those found in offline settings. Notably, Democrats are more isolated than Republicans in both settings, and only older Republicans exhibit higher online than offline segregation. Our results contribute to the emerging literature on political communication and the homophily of online networks, providing novel evidence on partisan sorting both online and offline.
Related papers
- The Role of Partisan Culture in Mental Health Language Online [32.60242402941811]
We present a large-scale observational study of 2,184,356 posts from 8,916 statistically matched Republican, Democrat, and unaffiliated online support community members.<n>We find that partisan culture does play into expressions of distress, underscoring the importance of considering partisan cultural differences in the design of online support community platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T12:44:10Z) - Physical partisan proximity outweighs online ties in predicting US voting outcomes [5.994629264812846]
Using individual survey data and aggregated and de-identified co-location and online network data, we investigate the relationship between partisan exposure and vote choice in the US.<n>We find that partisan exposure in the physical space, as captured by co-location patterns, more accurately predicts electoral outcomes in US counties.<n>We also estimate county-level experienced partisan segregation and examine its relationship with individuals' demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T20:02:18Z) - Unpacking polarization: Antagonism and Alignment in Signed Networks of
Online Interaction [0.3581083356941628]
In the 20th century, major fault lines were formed by structural conflicts, like owners vs workers, center vs periphery, etc.
We present the FAULTANA pipeline, a computational method to uncover major fault lines in data of signed online interactions.
Our method makes it possible to quantify the degree of antagonism prevalent in different online debates, as well as how aligned each debate is to the major fault line.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-13T05:57:48Z) - Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News
Discussion on Reddit [9.875731068651561]
We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic groups in a typical opinion formation context.
We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on Reddit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-15T11:37:12Z) - Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican
legislative election [55.41644538483948]
We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day.
We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z) - Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers
and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years.
We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to
misinformation [71.46564239895892]
We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter.
We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.