Sharpness-aware Dynamic Anchor Selection for Generalized Category Discovery

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12925v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 02:24:06 GMT
• Title: Sharpness-aware Dynamic Anchor Selection for Generalized Category Discovery
• Authors: Zhimao Peng, Enguang Wang, Fei Yang, Xialei Liu, Ming-Ming Cheng,
• Abstract summary: Given some labeled data of known classes, GCD aims to cluster unlabeled data that contain both known and unknown classes.<n>Large pre-trained models have a preference for some specific visual patterns, resulting in encoding spurious correlation for unlabeled data.<n>We propose a novel method, which contains two modules: Loss Sharpness Penalty (LSP) and Dynamic Anchor Selection (DAS)
• Score: 61.694524826522205
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generalized category discovery (GCD) is an important and challenging task in open-world learning. Specifically, given some labeled data of known classes, GCD aims to cluster unlabeled data that contain both known and unknown classes. Current GCD methods based on parametric classification adopt the DINO-like pseudo-labeling strategy, where the sharpened probability output of one view is used as supervision information for the other view. However, large pre-trained models have a preference for some specific visual patterns, resulting in encoding spurious correlation for unlabeled data and generating noisy pseudo-labels. To address this issue, we propose a novel method, which contains two modules: Loss Sharpness Penalty (LSP) and Dynamic Anchor Selection (DAS). LSP enhances the robustness of model parameters to small perturbations by minimizing the worst-case loss sharpness of the model, which suppressing the encoding of trivial features, thereby reducing overfitting of noise samples and improving the quality of pseudo-labels. Meanwhile, DAS selects representative samples for the unknown classes based on KNN density and class probability during the model training and assigns hard pseudo-labels to them, which not only alleviates the confidence difference between known and unknown classes but also enables the model to quickly learn more accurate feature distribution for the unknown classes, thus further improving the clustering accuracy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively mitigate the noise of pseudo-labels, and achieve state-of-the-art results on multiple GCD benchmarks.

Related papers

• Mitigating Instance-Dependent Label Noise: Integrating Self-Supervised Pretraining with Pseudo-Label Refinement [3.272177633069322]
  Real-world datasets often contain noisy labels due to human error, ambiguity, or resource constraints during the annotation process.<n>We propose a novel framework that combines self-supervised learning using SimCLR with iterative pseudo-label refinement.<n>Our approach significantly outperforms several state-of-the-art methods, particularly under high noise conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T09:56:49Z)
• Dual-Decoupling Learning and Metric-Adaptive Thresholding for Semi-Supervised Multi-Label Learning [81.83013974171364]
  Semi-supervised multi-label learning (SSMLL) is a powerful framework for leveraging unlabeled data to reduce the expensive cost of collecting precise multi-label annotations.<n>Unlike semi-supervised learning, one cannot select the most probable label as the pseudo-label in SSMLL due to multiple semantics contained in an instance.<n>We propose a dual-perspective method to generate high-quality pseudo-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T09:33:53Z)
• Fusing Conditional Submodular GAN and Programmatic Weak Supervision [5.300742881753571]
  Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) and generative models serve as crucial tools to maximize the utility of existing datasets without resorting to data gathering and manual annotation processes. PWS uses various weak supervision techniques to estimate the underlying class labels of data, while generative models primarily concentrate on sampling from the underlying distribution of the given dataset. Recently, WSGAN proposed a mechanism to fuse these two models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T07:49:13Z)
• NorMatch: Matching Normalizing Flows with Discriminative Classifiers for Semi-Supervised Learning [8.749830466953584]
  Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) aims to learn a model using a tiny labeled set and massive amounts of unlabeled data. In this work we introduce a new framework for SSL named NorMatch. We demonstrate, through numerical and visual results, that NorMatch achieves state-of-the-art performance on several datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-17T15:39:18Z)
• Instance-Dependent Noisy Label Learning via Graphical Modelling [30.922188228545906]
  Noisy labels are troublesome in the ecosystem of deep learning because models can easily overfit them. We present a new graphical modelling approach called InstanceGM that combines discriminative and generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T09:27:37Z)
• In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning [53.1047775185362]
  Pseudo-labeling (PL) is a general SSL approach that does not have this constraint but performs relatively poorly in its original formulation. We argue that PL underperforms due to the erroneous high confidence predictions from poorly calibrated models. We propose an uncertainty-aware pseudo-label selection (UPS) framework which improves pseudo labeling accuracy by drastically reducing the amount of noise encountered in the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T23:29:57Z)
• Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noise via a Universal Probabilistic Model [80.91927573604438]
  This paper proposes a simple yet universal probabilistic model, which explicitly relates noisy labels to their instances. Experiments on datasets with both synthetic and real-world label noise verify that the proposed method yields significant improvements on robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-14T05:43:51Z)
• Minimax Active Learning [61.729667575374606]
  Active learning aims to develop label-efficient algorithms by querying the most representative samples to be labeled by a human annotator. Current active learning techniques either rely on model uncertainty to select the most uncertain samples or use clustering or reconstruction to choose the most diverse set of unlabeled examples. We develop a semi-supervised minimax entropy-based active learning algorithm that leverages both uncertainty and diversity in an adversarial manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-18T19:03:40Z)
• Delving Deep into Label Smoothing [112.24527926373084]
  Label smoothing is an effective regularization tool for deep neural networks (DNNs) We present an Online Label Smoothing (OLS) strategy, which generates soft labels based on the statistics of the model prediction for the target category.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-25T08:03:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.